first)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > johan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
gt; >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Juergen Donnerstag <
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > &
ED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have a fix for that and our junit tests are still ok with
> it. But as
> > > > > > always, some existing apps might behave differently because
> the order
> >
e existing apps might behave differently because the
> order
> > > > > of the css links will change (base first, derived last). Should
> that
> > > > > go in before 1.3.3?
> > > > >
> > &g
first, derived last). Should that
> > > > go in before 1.3.3?
> > > >
> > > > Juergen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > > > > From:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > > > From: "Matej Knopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: March 25, 2008 11:51:20 AM PDT
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &
l change (base first, derived last). Should that
> > go in before 1.3.3?
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > > From: "Matej Knopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: March 25, 2008 11:51:20 AM PDT
&g
> of the css links will change (base first, derived last). Should that
> go in before 1.3.3?
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> > > From: "Matej Knopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: March 25, 2008 11:51:20 AM PDT
>
"Matej Knopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: March 25, 2008 11:51:20 AM PDT
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Bug in order of rendered links within ?
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I agree that we should. But I'
