> > this style of code also has a single return point:
> >
> > V v=cache.get(k);
> > if (v==null) {
> > v=new V();
> > cache.put(k,v);
> > }
> > return v;
> >
> > its just coding preference, we seem to like the example above more.
> >
> > -igor
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Ideas-on-cache-tp15452545p15469853.html
>
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
re.
>
> -igor
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ideas-on-cache-tp15452545p15469853.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ng to think about.. perhaps. (or i miss something). I
> don't profess to know what I'm talking about.
>
> Thanks for making such a great framework.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Ideas-on-cache-tp15452545p15452545.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
bject.
Anyway, just something to think about.. perhaps. (or i miss something). I
don't profess to know what I'm talking about.
Thanks for making such a great framework.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ideas-on-cache-tp15452545p15452545.html
Sent from the Wicket
