Re: org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringEscapeUtils vs apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils

2016-06-08 Thread Francois Meillet
Agree to keep things lights Thanks Martin, François > Le 8 juin 2016 à 11:58, Martin Grigorov a écrit : > > Hi Francois, > > This has been done long time ago (Wicket 1.0/1.1). > The idea is to keep Wicket light, without dependencies. > Only the classes Wicket internals needed were copied

Re: org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringEscapeUtils vs apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Francois, This has been done long time ago (Wicket 1.0/1.1). The idea is to keep Wicket light, without dependencies. Only the classes Wicket internals needed were copied. In Wicket 7.0.0 we introduced dependency to commons-fileupload to be able to update it. This also included commons-io as tra

org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringEscapeUtils vs apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils

2016-06-08 Thread Francois Meillet
Hi, Why use a copy of the org.apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils and not directly the lib ? Thanks François