With 3 binding +1 votes, and one non-binding +1 vote, this vote passes.
Colm.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Marc Giger wrote:
> +1
>
> Marc
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:26:51 +0100
> Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Unfortunately I screwed up the WSS4J 1.6.17 distribution + so
+1
Marc
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:26:51 +0100
Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately I screwed up the WSS4J 1.6.17 distribution + so I am
> calling another vote on it. I forgot to update the version from
> "wss4j-1.6.16" to "wss4j-1.6.17", and so all of the filenames have
> the wr
+1
Dan
On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:26 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately I screwed up the WSS4J 1.6.17 distribution + so I am calling
> another vote on it. I forgot to update the version from "wss4j-1.6.16" to
> "wss4j-1.6.17", and so all of the filenames have the wrong ver
+1
On 06/10/14 10:26, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
Unfortunately I screwed up the WSS4J 1.6.17 distribution + so I am
calling another vote on it. I forgot to update the version from
"wss4j-1.6.16" to "wss4j-1.6.17", and so all of the filenames have the
wrong version + internal director
Hi all,
Unfortunately I screwed up the WSS4J 1.6.17 distribution + so I am calling
another vote on it. I forgot to update the version from "wss4j-1.6.16" to
"wss4j-1.6.17", and so all of the filenames have the wrong version +
internal directory name. This is the only change from the previous
distr
