Re: [Dev] Issue with new service metadata persistence in a cluster

A solution to this came to my mind just now. We can handle this by making the DeploymentInterceptor aware of the DeploymentSynchronizer. If the DeploymentInterceptor detects that a newly added artifact has been added through an update done by the DepSync, it should refrain from creating the metafi

Re: [Dev] Does DepSync commit happens even if AutoCommit is set to false?

This status flag is important because that is used for sending the cluster message which notifies other nodes to get an update. If there are local changes in the node, and those changes were committed, that particular node has to inform other nodes to get updates. To reduce the unnecessary overhead

[Dev] Issue with new service metadata persistence in a cluster

Hi, I've been looking at how the service metadata files propagate to other cluster nodes. I'm using SVN-based depsync. But I've faced to an issue. Here, what happens is that Deployment Synchronizer propagates the service archives to the other nodes. And then DeploymentInterceptor creates service me

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

Hi, There is an issue in GS server startup [1]. We are looking into it. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12955 Thanks, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Sanjaya Vithanagama wrote: > Hi > > Tested BPS: > > 1. No errors at startup. > 2. No issues when samples run > > Note: There was a mi

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

Hi Tested BPS: 1. No errors at startup. 2. No issues when samples run Note: There was a minor issue in process visualisation . Created https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12953 to track. Regards, SanjayaV. On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > Hi RMs, > > Please find c

Re: [Dev] Getting "401 Error: Unauthorized" error from admin services after a standalone AS kept idle for a while

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Supun Malinga wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Supun Malinga wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone know the cause for this? >>> Had to restart the server due to the error. >> >> >> In fact

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

Couple of minor mistakes found in the samples README files, will be fixed them soon... One exception while running some samples related to the carbon log file still exists. Other samples and startup are passed in GReg. Regards, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > CSG pa

Re: [Dev] Error message when starting samples/axis2Server

Is there a JIRA created for this? Issue still exists for Samples in GReg. Regards, On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Sanjaya Vithanagama wrote: > Hi Azeez, > > I tried to run the server by using -Dcarbon.home, but the server start-up > did not complete ( did not proceed after log message: *Using

Re: [Dev] Does DepSync commit happens even if AutoCommit is set to false?

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > It looks like this task impl does not take the autoCommit flag into > account. > Yes, it seems status should be false if autoCommit flag is set to false. So, do you think wrapping "status = depsync.commit(tenantId)" with a condition o

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

HI Kishanthan, Please note that ejb-services is still undergoing some major ui changes. Please omit it from smoke test. This will be ready in the next alpha pack. Also some changes I made last night are not included in this pack. thanks, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Lakmali Baminiwatta wro

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

Hi, Done a smoke test for DSS. No errors in startup and all samples are running. Thanks, Lakmali On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > CSG passed the smoke tests. > > Rajika > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > >> Hi RMs, >> >> Please find can

Re: [Dev] Invitation: [Integration TG] Code Review @ Wed Apr 18 10am - 11am (sur...@wso2.com)

Those who were present at the session, please add yourself to the Crucible review, regardless of whether you have any feedback or not. Thanks, Hiranya On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Hasini Gunasinghe wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Ap

Re: [Dev] Does DepSync commit happens even if AutoCommit is set to false?

It looks like this task impl does not take the autoCommit flag into account. This task is generally used in SLive where all the nodes are in autoCommit mode. So not a problem in that environment. Azeez should be able to explain more. Thanks, Hiranya On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Kasun Gajasin

Re: [Dev] Invitation: Code Review of ESB Smooks Mediator Improvements @ Wed Mar 28 11:30am - 12:30pm (WSO2 Strategy)

Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Anjana Fernando wrote: > Hi Lakmali, > > 6 TPS for a small message is very unlikely! .. did you by any chance put a > time interval between tests in SOAPUI, if so, make it 0 and try the tests > again. > Yes, the Test Delay value had been set to 1000. Thanks

Re: [Dev] HumanTask TestNG failures on BPS

Hi Denis, I'm checking this. Regards, SanjayaV. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Denis Weerasiri wrote: > Hi, > I'm getting few test case failures. > Failed tests: > claimService(org.wso2.bps.integration.tests.humantask.TaskCreationTestCase): > https://localhost:9443/services/ClaimService serv

Re: [Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

CSG passed the smoke tests. Rajika On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > Hi RMs, > > Please find candidates for Carbon 4.00 Alpha 4 packs here. > > > http://builder4.us1.wso2.org:/bamboo/browse/WSO2CARBON-PRODUCTS-JOB1-66/artifact > > Please do a smoke test. Smoke tes

[Dev] Carbon Alpha 4 packs for smoke testing

Hi RMs, Please find candidates for Carbon 4.00 Alpha 4 packs here. http://builder4.us1.wso2.org:/bamboo/browse/WSO2CARBON-PRODUCTS-JOB1-66/artifact Please do a smoke test. Smoke test means 1) No errors at startup 2) All samples are running thanks, dimuthu -- Dimuthu Leelarathne Technical

Re: [Dev] Deployment synchronizer totally broken in trunk?

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: >>> >>> On a related note, the way we handle service metadata is, we give precedence to the metadata s

Re: [Dev] INFO - PermissionTree Newly loaded permission tree .....

Hi Sumedha, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > Shall we move bellow log to DEBUG category. This happens every 15 mins > when the server is idle. > IMO it looks ugly to have a screen full of bellow line when your server is > idle for a while. > > +1. Will do thanks, dimu

Re: [Dev] New C4 pack for QA

Hi Charitha, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > Hi Dimuthu, > Can we have a new set of carbon packs today? We need to start setting up > production scenario in the lab however reg. mounting is broken in current > alpha3 packs. > > Will do. thanks, dimuthu > Thanks, >

[Dev] INFO - PermissionTree Newly loaded permission tree .....

Shall we move bellow log to DEBUG category. This happens every 15 mins when the server is idle. IMO it looks ugly to have a screen full of bellow line when your server is idle for a while. [2012-04-22 23:20:23,825] INFO - PermissionTree Newly loaded permission tree from database for tenant 0 [20

Re: [Dev] Deployment synchronizer totally broken in trunk?

+1 for the approach. There is a useful feature in depsync UI, that we can commit/check-out as we want (checkout now and commit-now options). Though this does not make sense in production, when troubleshooting depsync related issues in a cluster, we usually use it. If possible, please leave these op

[Dev] New C4 pack for QA

Hi Dimuthu, Can we have a new set of carbon packs today? We need to start setting up production scenario in the lab however reg. mounting is broken in current alpha3 packs. Thanks, Charitha -- Charitha Kankanamge cell: +94 718 359 265 blog: http://charithaka.blogspot.com _

[Dev] Does DepSync commit happens even if AutoCommit is set to false?

Hi folks, $subject. I've set AutoCommit to false in slave nodes, and AutoCheckout true in master node. While I was debugging the code, it turned out that even the slave node executes commit command. Yes, the sync task respects the AutoCommit tag, but I'm seeing following code segment in CarbonDepl

[Dev] Review all docs which mention conf files

We have dropped the mgt-transports.xml & changed the location of most major config files. All docs have to be thoroughly reviewed, QAd & *changed* -- Afkham Azeez Sent from my phone ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin

Re: [Dev] Is there a way to stop the execution of a synapse task programmatically?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Let's get rid of the autoscaler.xml file, then Synapse will not create and > start the task. One of the LB components should talke the responsibility of > creating the Synapse task and starting it. You will need to look at the > Synapse code

Re: [Dev] Is there a way to stop the execution of a synapse task programmatically?

Let's get rid of the autoscaler.xml file, then Synapse will not create and start the task. One of the LB components should talke the responsibility of creating the Synapse task and starting it. You will need to look at the Synapse code to figure out how to do it. On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 12:03 PM,

[Dev] Lots of WS Registry Client Exceptions

Hi Hiranya, On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > >> Hiranya, >> Looks like you experiencing "subject: Facing an Intermittent issue when >> getting the api list from the registry". >> >> There is a correspon