Re: [Dev] Proposed key management functionality

2013-07-02 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
Great...!!! Please go ahead.. lets us know if you need any help.. You can provide the patch through the JIRA... Thanks & regards, -Prabath On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:27 PM, chris snow wrote: > Thanks Prabath. > > JIRA created: https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-14173 > > I have noted on the JIR

Re: [Dev] App Factory UI automation

2013-07-02 Thread Randika Ratnayake
hi , i checked with the surefire report, during the execution the application has not created successfully. In that case rest of the tests are getting failed i will re execute the tests and give an update Best Regards On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > Hi Randika,

[Dev] Invitation: Code Review - Siddhi event tables @ Tue Jul 9, 2013 3pm - 4pm (raje...@wso2.com)

2013-07-02 Thread Rajeev Sampath
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20130709T093000Z DTEND:20130709T103000Z DTSTAMP:20130702T072421Z ORGANIZER;CN=Rajeev Sampath:mailto:raje...@wso2.com UID:g18v1kte8i1tn493uhnej11...@google.com ATTENDE

Re: [Dev] Mowing kernel registry core tests into a separate module

2013-07-02 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
Hi Pulasthi, Can you explain the cyclic dependency in brief? Thanks, Sameera. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Pulasthi Supun wrote: > Hi all, > > Due to a cyclic dependency issue that was encountered when running > registry core tests with the new caching implementation the registry core > t

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
I build from the top. i.e from the platform level. thanks, Amila. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi Amila, > > Have you build > https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/trunk/components/stratos/org.wso2.carbon.stratos.cloud.controller? > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013

Re: [Dev] Mowing kernel registry core tests into a separate module

2013-07-02 Thread Afkham Azeez
Plans have changed On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > Hi Pulasthi, > > Can you explain the cyclic dependency in brief? > > Thanks, > Sameera. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Pulasthi Supun wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Due to a cyclic dependency issue that was encoun

[Dev] Build Failure in carbon/platform/trunk/dependencies

2013-07-02 Thread Chanika Geeganage
I am getting the following build failure [INFO] Scanning for projects... [ERROR] The build could not read 3 projects -> [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] The project org.apache.httpcomponents.wso2:httpcore:${orbit.patch.version.httpcore} (/home/chanika/WSO2/carbon/platform/trunk/dependencies/orbit/httpco

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Nirmal Fernando
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > I build from the top. i.e from the platform level. > hmmm... AFAIS https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/trunk/components/stratos/org.wso2.carbon.stratos.cloud.controlleris added to the root POM and it has the version as 2.2.

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > >> I build from the top. i.e from the platform level. >> > > hmmm... AFAIS > https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/trunk/components/stratos/org.wso2.carbon.strato

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Nirmal Fernando
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: >> >>> I build from the top. i.e from the platform level. >>> >> >> hmmm... AFAIS >> https://svn.wso2.

[Dev] Platform Automated Test Suite - Build Requirements

2013-07-02 Thread Krishantha Samaraweera
Hi all, The platform automated test suite consists of product integration test jars and ant based test jar executor. This distribution builds after all products builds. Thus, in order to build WSO2 PATS, you need to build all products with integration tests. So in the future we must not release

[Dev] Identity Server 4.5.0 - M5 build

2013-07-02 Thread Darshana Gunawardana
Hi all, Please find the Milestone 5 of the WSO2 Identity Server 4.5.0 at https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/scratch/Identity-Server-4.5.0/M5/. The new User Store Manager Configuration UI feature and improved Identity component feature can be highlighted in this milestone. Thanks, -- Regards, Dars

[Dev] Hazelcast instance available as an OSGi service

2013-07-02 Thread Afkham Azeez
I have exposed the System Hazelcast instance as an OSGi service. This HazelcastInstance is the one which is created when clustering is enabled. Please make sure you use this instance if you want to use Hazelcast in your components. The service is of type com.hazelcast.core.HazelcastInstance. --

Re: [Dev] Mowing kernel registry core tests into a separate module

2013-07-02 Thread Afkham Azeez
No need to move the registry tests out. We have moved the caching implementation out of Carbon core & made it independent from Carbon core. Azeez On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Plans have changed > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > >> Hi Pula

Re: [Dev] Jmeter testsuite for SCIM CRUD API

2013-07-02 Thread Krishantha Samaraweera
Can you parameterized the script In future we can integrate the script with the test framework and get it executed. Thanks, Krishantha. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Shavantha Weerasinghe wrote: > Hi Charitha > > I have updated the script with, filter,view delete user and > add/edit/delete, f

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: >>> I build from the to

Re: [Dev] Hazelcast instance available as an OSGi service

2013-07-02 Thread Sriskandarajah Suhothayan
On Jul 2, 2013 4:12 PM, "Afkham Azeez" wrote: > > I have exposed the System Hazelcast instance as an OSGi service. This HazelcastInstance is the one which is created when clustering is enabled. > > Please make sure you use this instance if you want to use Hazelcast in your components. The service

[Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Sanjeewa Malalgoda
Hi All, Please find API manager pack for test from here[1]. Please note that we have known issue with thrift key validation service and we need to fix it. If you are using this pack change key validation client type to WSClient(add following parameter). This pack will include new caching related fi

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Do we have the auto tests report for this pack? On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > Hi All, > Please find API manager pack for test from here[1]. Please note that we > have known issue with thrift key validation service and we need to fix it. > If you are using this pack

Re: [Dev] Build error

2013-07-02 Thread Nirmal Fernando
Fixed in r176996. Sorry about these errors :( I'll grep all references tonight and check. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: [Dev] Build fail in org.wso2.carbon.cartridge.agent.feature

2013-07-02 Thread Nirmal Fernando
I've fixed this correctly in r177003. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > fixed in r176877, r176878 and r176879. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > >> Hi Pradeep, >> >> I'm looking in to this, will fix ASAP. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
Is it correct to name this as 1.4.1..? We have key changes at the core API and schema levels... Thanks & regards, -Prabath On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > Hi All, > Please find API manager pack for test from here[1]. Please note that we > have known issue with thrift

[Dev] Fwd: UES Nightly Build (02/07/2013)

2013-07-02 Thread Nuwan Bandara
UES Nightly cane be downloaded from [1], all issues must be reported against "fixed version : 1.0.0-Beta-2" at [2] [1] http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/UES-UES-48/artifact/JOB1/WSO2-User-Engagement-Server-Build/wso2ues-1.0.0.zip [2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/UES -- *Thanks & Regards, Nuwan Ban

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
But those are at CC level, not at product level. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Prabath Siriwardena wrote: > Is it correct to name this as 1.4.1..? We have key changes at the core API > and schema levels... > > Thanks & regards, > -Prabath > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
But Samisa... if it is a minor version change in the product, anyone would expect a smooth migration from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1. But its is not... 1. The way you configure your caching is different. 2. Need a DB migration script 3. The way you maintaine multiple user stores are different.. Thanks & rega

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
True, but we have not added anything at all on API side on the other hand. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Prabath Siriwardena wrote: > But Samisa... if it is a minor version change in the product, anyone would > expect a smooth migration from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1. But its is not... > > 1. The way you

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > True, but we have not added anything at all on API side on the other > hand. > > Though we don't have less/no changes at the APIM side I think packing CC with major feature improvement like multiple userstore which has a direct impact on

Re: [Dev] [APIM] API Manager 1.4.1 Trunk pack for test

2013-07-02 Thread Isuru Perera
I also think that next API Manager should not be a minor version, considering the fact that it will be based on a new Carbon kernel version (4.2.0), which has major changes in user's POV. And this is not only for API Manager, but also for all other products. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Sami

Re: [Dev] Mowing kernel registry core tests into a separate module

2013-07-02 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
+1. If the new caching implementation is independent of Carbon core then can we move it to dependencies as a separate project. I guess the old caching implementation was placed in the dependencies. WDYT? Thanks, Sameera. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > No need to move th

Re: [Dev] Mowing kernel registry core tests into a separate module

2013-07-02 Thread Afkham Azeez
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > +1. If the new caching implementation is independent of Carbon core then > can we move it to dependencies as a separate project. I guess the old > caching implementation was placed in the dependencies. > > WDYT? > Let's just leave it in

Re: [Dev] Red or Blue ?

2013-07-02 Thread Sanjeewa Malalgoda
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > Hi, > > Please give comments. Added screenshots. > Blue theme looks cool. +1 for use that. Thanks, Sanjeewa. > > thanks, > dimuthu > > -- > Dimuthu Leelarathne > Architect & Product Lead of App Factory > > WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)

Re: [Dev] Red or Blue ?

2013-07-02 Thread Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam
Hi, +1 for blue, since as a typical user when i see red it gives a intention that there is a error or failure.. Regards, Mohan On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > Hi, > > Please give comments. Added screenshots. > > thanks, > dimuthu > > -- > Dimuthu Leelarathne > Arch

Re: [Dev] Red or Blue ?

2013-07-02 Thread Gihan Anuruddha
+1 for Blue color theme. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please give comments. Added screenshots. >> > Blue theme looks cool. +1 for use that. > > Thanks, > Sanjeewa. > >> >> thanks, >> di

Re: [Dev] Red or Blue ?

2013-07-02 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Guys lets stick to the colors that were designed together .. its generally not a good idea to change color of one bit because it impact other color choices. Sanjiva. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne wrote: > Hi, > > Please give comments. Added screenshots. > > thanks, > dimu

Re: [Dev] Red or Blue ?

2013-07-02 Thread Ruwan Yatawara
Blue looks good. Red gives a "hazardous" feel to it. Ruwan Yatawara Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. lean . enterprise . middleware email : ruw...@wso2.com mobile : +94 77 9110413 www: :http://wso2.com On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam < mo...@wso2.com> wrote: >