Re: [Dev] CEP Clearing Event tracer logs completely disable event tracing

Ha then it looks like a bug, ! @CEP folks can you please verify Suho On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Suho, > > hmm... my expectation was it'll just clear the existing logs, and will > start to add the new logs, since I've enabled the even tracer. > > > On Sat, Sep 2

Re: [Dev] CEP Clearing Event tracer logs completely disable event tracing

Suho, hmm... my expectation was it'll just clear the existing logs, and will start to add the new logs, since I've enabled the even tracer. On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan wrote: > I think I that's the correct behavior. Can you give more insight. > > Suho > On Sep 2

Re: [Dev] CEP Clearing Event tracer logs completely disable event tracing

I think I that's the correct behavior. Can you give more insight. Suho On Sep 27, 2013 9:30 PM, "Nirmal Fernando" wrote: > Hi All, > > $Subject. > > Re-enabling tracing in InputEventAdaptor enables the logs again. > > -- > > Thanks & regards, > Nirmal > > Senior Software Engineer- Platform Tech

[Dev] CEP Clearing Event tracer logs completely disable event tracing

Hi All, $Subject. Re-enabling tracing in InputEventAdaptor enables the logs again. -- Thanks & regards, Nirmal Senior Software Engineer- Platform Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94715779733 Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ ___ Dev mailing

Re: [Dev] Where should I use BURL with MB topics

Hi, In newer qpid clients we use addressing format. But MB uses AMQP 0-91 which is older. Thus we need to specifically use BURL format as following BURL:topic://amq.topic?routingkey='test You should also be able to use a system property to change the default syntax so you don't need the prefix

Re: [Dev] [Commits] [Carbon-platform] svn commit r186207 - carbon/platform/branches/4.2.0/components/mediators

Hi Ruwan, This is completely wrong way of removing not releasing components/features. There are many places you have followed this approach :( I am reverting all those commits. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:47 AM, wrote: > Author: ruw...@wso2.com > Date: Tue Sep 24 10:47:30 2013 > New Revision: 1

Re: [Dev] Build failure in chunk02

Hi, Yes, the build failure regarding stubs is occurring to me as well in a clean repo. Will investigate further. On 27 September 2013 22:07, Isuru Udana wrote: > Yes it's up to date. > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Lasantha Fernando wrote: > >> Hi Isuru, >> >> Can you verify if you have

Re: [Dev] [Commits] [Carbon-platform] svn commit r186321 - in carbon/platform/branches/4.2.0/components/sequence-editor/org.wso2.carbon.sequences.ui/4.2.0: . src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/sequences/ui

Hi Vanji, I am reverting this commit as this leads to a compilation error. And I also noted you have committed to a released service stub in r186320. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:28 PM, wrote: > Author: va...@wso2.com > Date: Tue Sep 24 19:28:15 2013 > New Revision: 186321 > URL: http://wso2.org/

Re: [Dev] Where should I use BURL with MB topics

Hi, On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > Shammi, I thought we fixed this. Mohan can you check with Shammi. > OK sure.. will check with Shammi.. Regards, Mohan > > --Srinath > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam < > mo...@wso2.com> wrote: >

Re: [Dev] Build failure in chunk02

Yes it's up to date. On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Lasantha Fernando wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > Can you verify if you have taken an up on the service stubs? I found a > possible cause and did a fix on Sep 20, and after that this issue didn't > occur for me (on a clean repo). Also when building pa

[Dev] Developer Studio 3.3.0 Milestone 7 Released!

Hi All, We have WSO2 Developer Studio 3.3.0 Milestone 7 ready to be downloaded at [1]. Installed eclipse distributions available at [2]. This release includes following improvements, bug fixes and new features. New Features - [TOOLS-1922 ] - New Medi

Re: [Dev] CEP sample

Srinath can you send the query and the input please I'll go through Suho On Sep 27, 2013 3:45 AM, "Srinath Perera" wrote: > Thanks Rajeev, pls note this is bit urgent. > > --Srinath > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote: > >> Hi Suho, >> >> Re attaching Srinath's test cas

Re: [Dev] Build failure in chunk02

Hi Isuru, Can you verify if you have taken an up on the service stubs? I found a possible cause and did a fix on Sep 20, and after that this issue didn't occur for me (on a clean repo). Also when building packs for chunk-02 as well, this was not reported after that. Thanks, Lasantha On 27 Septe

Re: [Dev] Where should I use BURL with MB topics

Shammi, I thought we fixed this. Mohan can you check with Shammi. --Srinath On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam < mo...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Will check again and update the docs with necessary info.. > > Thanks, > Mohan > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:53 PM, N

Re: [Dev] CEP sample

Thanks Rajeev, pls note this is bit urgent. --Srinath On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote: > Hi Suho, > > Re attaching Srinath's test case for your reference. > > > Thanks > Rajeev > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan > wrote: > >> please write

Re: [Dev] Chunk 02 Build Failure

API changes can be classified as *adding API methods*,* removing API methods * and *updating the API method signatures*. If you remove a method or change the signature of method, then your changes are not backward compatible. i.e. you cannot run a released product like AS 5.2.0 with kernel patch000

Re: [Dev] Build failure in chunk02

Hi Lasantha, Did we manage to find the cause of this issue ? I am still getting this in a clean repo. Thanks. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Ayashkantha Ramasinghe < ayashkan...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I just built chunk2 with a clean repo and I happened to build the > following location

Re: [Dev] Branch 4.2.0 build fail in clean repo [org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing]

Hi Lasantha, Now it's fixed. Thanks. Regards, Gihan On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Lasantha Fernando wrote: > Hi Gihan, > > Can you try taking an up on the kernel patch and build patch0001 as well? > > Thanks, > Lasantha > > > On 27 September 2013 13:02, Gihan Anuruddha wrote: > >> >> [ERRO

Re: [Dev] Branch 4.2.0 build fail in clean repo [org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing]

Hi Gihan, Can you try taking an up on the kernel patch and build patch0001 as well? Thanks, Lasantha On 27 September 2013 13:02, Gihan Anuruddha wrote: > > [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : > [INFO] - > [ERROR] /home/gihan/wso2/carbon/plat

[Dev] Branch 4.2.0 build fail in clean repo [org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing]

[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] - [ERROR] /home/gihan/wso2/carbon/platform/branches/4.2.0 /components/registry/org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing/4.2.1/src/main/java /org/wso2/carbon/registry/indexing/service/ContentBasedSearchService.ja

Re: [Dev] IS 4.5.1 30th Sept Milestone status

We need to get the M1 out.. we need to build the 4.5.1 with the latest features and kernel patches... Branch is not frozen - we have given commit rights to some team members from each team - if not please create patches and attach to the JIRA - so I can commit.. Lets plan to get M1 out as planne

Re: [Dev] IS 4.5.1 30th Sept Milestone status

Hi Prabath, In terms of integration test coverage we can achieve 25% by M1. We also have significant progress in the 'User View' jaggery application . But I suggest lets have it for M2, once all the dashboards under 'My Identity' is covered and we remove them from management console UI. JIRAs co