Hi
O]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 25:33.107s
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Oct 17 12:06:55 IST 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 1357M/1789M
[INFO]
Hi,
I infact revert this above commit. Because the dependencies picks from the
orbit and it has correct signature. So the only possible issue is, chunk 02
not building latest orbit bundle.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Lasantha Fernando wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hit upon this same issue when doin
Yes. This is because when you remove the role from the user, those changes
are not immediately reflected on the Store. You should no longer be seeing
this issue after about 15 minutes.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Suneth Ranasinghe wrote:
>
> When create an API by restricting API visibilit
When create an API by restricting API visibility, restricting by roles and
let permitted user to access the API. Once after removing the relevant role
from the particular user and login in to the store again. But still the
restricted API is visible to the user. I have restarted the server and did
t
Hi all,
Hit upon this same issue when doing a clean repo build last night. When you
resume the build after failure, the build proceeds fine. This issue seems
to be consistently reproducible in a clean repo build. Any idea what is
happening?
Thanks,
Lasantha
On 9 October 2013 13:24, Subash Chatu
Hi IsuruH,
Can we also verify the fix at https://wso2.org/jira/browse/LB-82 ? It is
for tenant partitioning by sending tenantDomain as URL param with other
query params in place.
Thanks,
Kishanthan.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:
> Hi AmilaM,
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 201
Please grant commit rights to myself (IsuruH) as well. Earlier IsuruP had
the commit rights, but currently he is in support.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote:
> Please grant commit rights to :
>
> Dushan, Miyuru, Kasun
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Prabath Abeyseke
When JWT token and claims are enabled in api, following exception will be
printed in key manager.
ERROR {org.apache.axis2.rpc.receivers.RPCMessageReceiver} - There is no
suitable serializer for class
org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.impl.utils.ClaimCacheKey
{org.apache.axis2.rpc.receivers.RPCMessageReceive
Yes it is a security violation but with the details (apiName, apiVersion,
apiProvider, description, subscribedTier, status) that he can get the
security threat is minimal.
Also we have added a logic to check if the request is from same tenant
domain.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Nuwan Dias
BTW sending a content type header when there is no content is wrong. Yes
it's comes from axis2.
To get things working, only solution is consider 202 as no body messages as
there is no way to check that 202 has a content when content-type header is
present.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Anjana
Hi,
$subject is in chunk-01 feature list(/features/ws-discovery)[1], but it's
not available in the nexus repo[2]. This cause build breaks when building
on a clean repo. AFAIK whatever the features listed in the chunk-01 should
be available in the nexus repo. Please check this.
1.
https://svn.wso2
This means that anyone having a valid user account can login and retrieve
subscription information of another user right? If so, isn't it a security
violation?
Thanks,
NuwanD.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Punnadi Gunarathna wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In API-M 1.5.0 there is a api[1] in [2] which
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Isuru Perera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Prabath for the explanation. I agree with your points.
>
No prob.
>
> I just felt that this is very complicated. i.e. work in one chunk and move
> to next when one chunk release is over.
>
I guess, it would be great i
Hi All,
In API-M 1.5.0 there is a api[1] in [2] which takes application name as the
input parameter and returns api information[3]. Moreover it usees the
logged in users' username to get the results along with the application
name.
[1] getSubscriptionByApplication
[2]
store/site/blocks/subscripti
Hi,
Thanks Prabath for the explanation. I agree with your points.
I just felt that this is very complicated. i.e. work in one chunk and move
to next when one chunk release is over.
But I cannot really tell, since I'm not working on release work for now and
I do not understand the real complexiti
Please grant commit rights to :
Dushan, Miyuru, Kasun
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
> Hi Sumedha,
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can we get the
Hi,
I am still getting the same error while building Kernal-4.2.0.
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.wso2.carbon:SecVerifier:4.2.0
(/home/malintha/projects/carbon-branch-4.2.0/kernel/4.2.0/distribution/integration/security-verifier/pom.xml)
AFAIR there're not much (if not none) changes in this area. But we should
always test this aspect of ELB.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:
> Hi AmilaM,
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi wrote:
>
>> Hi IsuruH,
>>
>> $Subject? If not can you please
Hi Isuru,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Isuru Perera wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please ignore my previous mail. Just got to know that there shouldn't
>> ideally be a chunk-3 SVN locaiton created till its preceding version is
>>
Hi AmilaM,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi wrote:
> Hi IsuruH,
>
> $Subject? If not can you please test it before the release. We (Cloud
> team) are going to need it for our deployment and we will also try it from
> our end. Wanted to bring it to your attention so that you ca
Hi IsuruH,
$Subject? If not can you please test it before the release. We (Cloud team)
are going to need it for our deployment and we will also try it from our
end. Wanted to bring it to your attention so that you can fix if there are
any issues before the release.
Regards,
AmilaM.
--
*Amila Ma
Hi Miyuru,
If it is not illegal to do so, then we cannot fix something like that. This
behavior anyway, we are getting from Axis2, not from data services specific
code. Also, I saw in a ESB sample [1], the ESB itself is behaving this way
in responding with HTTP 202.
[1]
http://docs.wso2.org/displ
> It works perfectly!! THANK YOU :) When I test it a little more if you're
> interested in the broker I will give it to you!!
>
Oh that's great... : )
If you really like to contribute for this open source project.. Then you
can add your broker in the CEP public jira (https://wso2.org/jira/browse/
It works perfectly!! THANK YOU :) When I test it a little more if you're
interested in the broker I will give it to you!!
--
View this message in context:
http://wso2-oxygen-tank.10903.n7.nabble.com/Dev-Custom-broker-kafka-all-implemented-Error-when-testing-tp87435p87442.html
Sent from the WSO2
Hi Andres,
> First, Thank you for your help!!
>
> To verify that my custom broker kafka get events properly! I have thrown an
> exception on the line marked "/ / HERE!!" and I could see that the map is
> created successfully! I map I can print objects without problems! :) That
> map is the same T
$Subject can be found at [1]
[1] http://builder1.us1.wso2.org/~gs2/store/10-17-13/wso2store-1.0.0.zip
--
*Thanks & Regards,
Nuwan Bandara
Technical Lead; **WSO2 Inc. *
*lean . enterprise . middleware | http://wso2.com *
*blog : http://nuwanbando.com; email: nu...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 214 53
Hi Mohan,
First, Thank you for your help!!
To verify that my custom broker kafka get events properly! I have thrown an
exception on the line marked "/ / HERE!!" and I could see that the map is
created successfully! I map I can print objects without problems! :) That
map is the same That I send to
Hi,
Fixed in 188496. This is due to wrong dependency version and artifact id
inline with new cassandra v10 dependency.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> INFO]
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
*WSO2 Business Process Server 3.1.0 Alpha Released!*
Date: 16th October 2013
WSO2 Business Process Server team is pleased to announce the release of
3.1.0 Alpha version of WSO2 Business Process Server.
It could be downloaded from h
ttps://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/people/thilini/releases/Business-
Hi all,
When I tried to call DSS boxcaring and faced a issue when processing reply
message flow.
for begin boxcar, DSS returns 202 message with content type header.
HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted
Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=E6D09FBA4BEF0AE451844DE3726E28A5; Path=/; HttpOnly
*Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF
Hi Andres,
I couldn't make much decision based on the given information.. But I can
give some comments based on your info. See the comments in line..
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:54 PM, andresgomez92 wrote:
> Hi all, I have already implemented all the code needed to kafka broker. I
> made the conne
Hi all, I have already implemented all the code needed to kafka broker. I
made the connection between WSO2 and kafka queue.
I send the events to WSO2 as follows:
**
public class ConsumerTest imp
IIRC, Miyuru fixed this at synapse level recently.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Dimuthu De Lanerolle wrote:
> I am getting this error while trying to deploy a Capp in esb 4.8.0
> distribution. I have created Message store and a Message processor and a
> faulty Endpoint. AFAIU according to th
Hi folks,
Please fix,
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 4:11.309s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Oct 16 15:34:30 IST 2013
[INFO] Final Mem
Hi all products teams whose features releasing with chunk 02. $subject
please with the latest versions of your features.
--
Thanks
/subash
*Subash Chaturanga*
Senior Software Engineer :Integration TG; WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com
email: sub...@wso2.com
blog: http://subashsdm.blogspot.com/
twitter
Still I'm getting this with clean repo. Please have a look.
Regards,
Gihan
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
> I have fixed this.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subash Chaturanga wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> Apparently this is due to some uncommited local change
I am getting this error while trying to deploy a Capp in esb 4.8.0
distribution. I have created Message store and a Message processor and a
faulty Endpoint. AFAIU according to the synchronized Capp deployment
concept "ApplicationManager Successfully Deployed Carbon Application :
CApp_1.0.0" should
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please ignore my previous mail. Just got to know that there shouldn't
> ideally be a chunk-3 SVN locaiton created till its preceding version is
> released.
>
This means we cannot work on releases in parallel, right?
As I un
Hi,
INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 27:17.805s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Oct 16 15:26:14 IST 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 1359M/1835M
[I
Hi,
I created and CBR proxy (with a switch mediator) in our QA setup and When I
invoke it directly from the worker nodes response comes properly back to
the client. But when it is invoked through ELB the response body gets
dropped, only gets a 200OK response.
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ESB
On 16 October 2013 14:42, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is fixed. Please take an up of cassandra feature.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Prabath
>
Thanks for looking into this..
Thanks,
Lasantha
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
>
>> Hi Lasantha,
>>
>> Let me have a
Hi,
This is fixed. Please take an up of cassandra feature.
Cheers,
Prabath
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Prabath Abeysekera wrote:
> Hi Lasantha,
>
> Let me have a look.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Prabath
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Lasantha Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi Prabath, Bhathiya,
>>
>>
Hi,
Please ignore my previous mail. Just got to know that there shouldn't
ideally be a chunk-3 SVN locaiton created till its preceding version is
released. So we'll be moving all Cassandra related dependencies from
chunk-3 to chunk-2 poms.
Cheers,
Prabath
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Inosh
Hi Prabath,
Currently BAM and CEP are in chunk-02 and we depend on the cassandra
dependencies. Once Chunk02 is released, the migration of unreleased
components is supposed to be carried out, so till then it will be better if
the Cassandra dependencies are kept.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:19 PM
44 matches
Mail list logo
