Hi Pirin,
Isn't this issue apply to database names? Can you create 2 databases with
same name under two application?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Pirinthapan Mahendran
wrote:
> Hi Amalka,
>
> The issue is not only during the database creation time. I am considering
> the following scenario
Hi Amalka,
The issue is not only during the database creation time. I am considering
the following scenario :
After a user created the databases with different names under different
apps, he cant create the user (by clicking the button "Add New User") with
the same name under these databases.
Tha
Without creating user with database name, can't we generate 7 character
user name randomly?
There's another scenario: if we try create a new database with a name which
was deleted earlier, that does not allow to create the user again with the
same name. (user is exist although we remove the databa
Hi Pirinthapan
I guess what we need to do is create the final user name as following
_
So this won't support by OOTB in SS.
@Dimuthu : Is it OK if we add another service to RSSAdmin service to create
a application specific database user? WDYT?
Thanks & Regards
Danushka Fernando
Software Engine
Hi Rajeevan,
The application key is not globally unique. Its unique only within each
tenant. So we can't use application key to uniquely identify a user name.
Thanks.
Mahendran Pirinthapan
Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
Mobile +94772378732.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Rajeevan Vimalanatha
Hi Pirinthapan,
Since the user name is not unique at the tenant domain (but it should be
unique at application domain), can't we simply use the following pattern to
the verification of user name?
_
I hope this should resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Rajeevan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Pirinth
Hi all,
In App Factory, the database users are application local. That means if we
create a database user under one application its not visible to another
application even within the same tenant. So if we try to create a user with
the same name in different applications within same tenant, we are
