Its because your class contain only 11 lines :)
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Gihan Anuruddha wrote:
> Hi Krishantha,
>
> I covered the areas that I need to test in that class. But due to that
> private constructor, code coverage percentage affects drastically :(
>
> Rega
Hi Krishantha,
I covered the areas that I need to test in that class. But due to that
private constructor, code coverage percentage affects drastically :(
Regards,
Gihan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote:
> Hi Gihan,
>
> I think you are writing integration test to c
Hi Gihan,
I think you are writing integration test to cover the case. If it is the
case, generating coverage for empty private method is not possible. There
is a bug reported in Emma to skip the empty private constructors [1].
If it is a unit test, you can use java reflection to call private meth
Hi Saneth,
No. We are only using static methods in that class. So there is no need to
call that private method. That was only added as suggest by sonar.
Regards,
Gihan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Saneth Dharmakeerthi
wrote:
> Hi Gihan,
>
> Isn't that private constructor is get called by a
Hi Gihan,
Isn't that private constructor is get called by anywhere inside that class?.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Saneth Dharmakeerthi
Senior Software Engineer
WSO2, Inc.
Mobile: +94772325511
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Gihan Anuruddha wrote:
> Hi Automation team,
>
> What we are actually
Hi Automation team,
What we are actually looking as a code coverage stat? In my
ServiceHolder class,
I added private constructor based on sonar suggestion. Now, due to that I
can't make my class, 100% code coverage in term of line, block and method.
How do I overcome this problem and increase my
