Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi all, Thank you everyone for the guidance and support you gave through out the period. Special thanks goes to Isuru Udana for the continuous support provided. :) On Aug 24, 2016 11:27 AM, "Dinanjana Gunaratne" < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Kasun, > > Currently the OOM scenario

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hello Kasun, Currently the OOM scenario is mapped to "OOM" event in the ESB flight recorder. And CPU Spinning is mapped to "High CPU Usage" event in the tool. The requested resources for those events can be configured by the user of ESB Flight Recorder. Thanks, Dinanjana. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 a

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Thanks, Dinanjana. I think it's good to have how different scenarios can be handled from ESB flight recorder information. - OOM - CPU spinning - Deadlock etc. Thanks, Kasun. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Currently the too

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi all, Currently the tool supports generating jfr along with thread dumps and heap dumps. And the report template has been changed so that it reflects a lot more details on environmental details during an event. All collectibles along with thread dumps and jfrs will be bundled in to a zip archive

[Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Dear all, This[1] is the blog post I made for final work product submission. Please have a look. :) [1]http://dinanjanagunaratne.blogspot.com/2016/08/during- past-3-months-i-was-engaged-in.html _

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Increase of CPU usage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Server goes to an unresponsive state >>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to extract useful information to debug the issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the server goes to >&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

rver goes OOM, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will automatically generate the heap dump. >>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>>>>>>> (requests) or may be due to a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug. So we need to extract information like

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

t;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Nadeeshaan >>>>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>> First let's try to build WSO2 ESB from source and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then dig in deep to the source. In order to do so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

7768434574235180537_m_-7235778947164465931_m_7232211748715967048_m_-3757373977837873170_m_-8283982100572052979_m_1362338246273110367_m_-1442751731575898940_m_6485817575745999246_m_265559619745955743_3779151517627746345_-555366748_-88362740_816856320_1348862296_-537557168_478758164_1912754997_-722133546_-1073985791_> >>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

<http://nadeeshaan.blogspot.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get a signature like this: Click here! >>>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

t;>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>> Sorry for bothering you again. I created a sample >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module with some of the requirements you mentioned in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gs

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

on of ESB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 20, 2016 9:33 AM, "Dinanjana Gunaratne" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Isuru, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we looking at an implementation like this ? >>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>> of software deployed remotely. This monitoring system is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly scalable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and does not depend on any component which is b

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was developed by us for connects to Dashboard and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share information. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an implementation within esb for debugging and monitoring. am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i correct ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

.! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> btw, don't call me "Sir" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Isuru, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Found the solution :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:49

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

-02-20 08:41:21,491] FATAL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {samples.util.SampleAxis2ServerManager} - [SimpleAxisServer] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shutti >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ng d

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

t;>>> org.apache.axis2.deployment.FileSystemConfigurator.getAxisConfiguration(FileSystemConfigu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rator.java:118) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

figurationContextFromFileSy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stem(ConfigurationContextFactory.java:210) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samples.util.SampleAxis2ServerManager.st

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

is2Server.startServer(SampleAxis2Server.java:61) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>>>>>>>>>>>> Method) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

va:43) >>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) >>>>>>>>>>>> at samples.util.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:132) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

com/questions/32866263/axis2server-packed-with-esb-4-9-0-doesnt-start-while-it-works-fine-4-8-0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < >>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

rver.bat came bundled with wso2esb i >>>>>>>>>>> am getting this >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Usage: java [-options] class [args...] >>>>>>>>>>>(to ex

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

e >>>>>>>>>> -d64 use a 64-bit data model if available >>>>>>>>>> -server to select the "server" VM >>>>>>>>>> The d

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

require the specified version to run >>>>>>>> -showversion print product version and continue >>>>>>>> -jre-restrict-search | -no-jre-restrict-search >>>>>>>> include/exclude user private JREs in the versi

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

include/exclude user private JREs in the version >>>>>>> search >>>>>>> -? -help print this help message >>>>>>> -Xprint help on non-standard options >>>>>>> -ea[:...|:] >>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

able assertions with specified granularity >>>>>> -da[:...|:] >>>>>> -disableassertions[:...|:] >>>>>> disable assertions with specified granularity >>>>>> -esa | -enablesystemassertions >

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

disable system assertions >>>>> -agentlib:[=] >>>>> load native agent library , e.g. >>>>> -agentlib:hprof >>>>> see also, -agentlib:jdwp=help and >>>>> -agentlib:hprof=help >

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

/ESB490/Samples Thanks. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Dinanjana Gunaratne > Date: Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:27 PM > Subject: [Dev]GSOC 2016: Proposal 7 > > > Dear Sir, > > I m a 3rd year Comp