On Sunday, June 10, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
> Having said that, have we,
>
> 1. Cleaned up the unused wrapper logic.
> 2. Fixed docs etc on how to use the new approach?
>
You don't need to fix the docs about startup. Still it is going to be
wso2server.sh --start and internally it is going to
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
> Having said that, have we,
>
> 1. Cleaned up the unused wrapper logic.
>
yes
> 2. Fixed docs etc on how to use the new approach?
>
No not yet. AFAIK
> 3. And, have we tested this?
>
initial developer testing, done.
>
> If not, I'd ex
Having said that, have we,
1. Cleaned up the unused wrapper logic.
2. Fixed docs etc on how to use the new approach?
3. And, have we tested this?
If not, I'd expect these to be recorded as L1 issues for the Carbon Kernel.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
Thank you. Added to the OSQA content.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban wrote:
> We are going with nohup from 4.0.0, removing the wrapper. There are a few
> mail threads on this. Pls refer to the thread, "Removing Java Service
> Wrapper from Carbon" and "Replacing JSW with noh
We are going with nohup from 4.0.0, removing the wrapper. There are a few
mail threads on this. Pls refer to the thread, "Removing Java Service
Wrapper from Carbon" and "Replacing JSW with nohup"
Regards,
Pradeeban.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> $subj
Hi all,
$subject.
or is it recommended to use 'nohup ./wso2server.sh &' ?
Please explain what is appropriate.
Thank you.
--
--
Lahiru Sandaruwan
Software Engineer,
Cloud Team,
WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954
blog: http://la
