Hi Sagara,
I will do.
Thanks
Waruna
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Waruna Jayaweera
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sagara,
>> Yes. We can keep our own logging-bridge.properties for BPS. But we may
>> miss kernel level future changes to lo
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Waruna Jayaweera wrote:
> Hi Sagara,
> Yes. We can keep our own logging-bridge.properties for BPS. But we may
> miss kernel level future changes to logging-bridge.properties file. If
> there are any changes in kernel level then we need to update product
> specific
Hi Sagara,
Yes. We can keep our own logging-bridge.properties for BPS. But we may miss
kernel level future changes to logging-bridge.properties file. If there are
any changes in kernel level then we need to update product specific file
manually.
Currently we do not have any log filter for restlet
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Waruna Jayaweera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and merge [1]
>
> *About diff*
> BPMN activiti dependency Restlet (currently having INFO level) component
> logging relies on JDK's logging API (java.util.logging) and need use
> java.util.logging.config.file to fil
Hi,
Please review and merge [1]
*About diff*
BPMN activiti dependency Restlet (currently having INFO level) component
logging relies on JDK's logging API (java.util.logging) and need use
java.util.logging.config.file to filter log messages. In carbon products
java.util.logging.config.file proper
