Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-05 Thread Krishantha Samaraweera
Hi, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, I merged and moved the kernel code to github in [1]. Now it is building and passing tests 24/1/0 where verifyAdminServiceSecurityTest class: org.wso2.carbon.integration.tests test is failing and I am

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-03 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara, I've committed the merged code to the wso2-axis2 repository. Shall we move those artifact to nexus as well? It seems Axis2 orbit modules are not there I will add them and create a job in Jenkins so that it

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-03 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote: Are we gonna release the forked code from now on?. Or should we wait until we get bit more closer to the major release..? Until we do the official releases we will do SNAPSHOT releases into Nexus snapshot repository in daily

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-03 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Maheshika Goonetilleke mahesh...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara I'm trying to create a plan for wso2-wss4j. However, I'm unable to create as the GITHub repo is not visible while trying to configure the plan. I also faced to same issue but AFAIK there is no

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-03 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Sagara, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sagara Gunathunga sag...@wso2.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara, I've committed the merged code to the wso2-axis2 repository. Shall we move those artifact to nexus as well? It

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-02 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Sagara, I've committed the merged code to the wso2-axis2 repository. Shall we move those artifact to nexus as well? thanks Eranda On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Sagara Gunathunga sag...@wso2.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-02 Thread Supun Malinga
Are we gonna release the forked code from now on?. Or should we wait until we get bit more closer to the major release..? thanks, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara, I've committed the merged code to the wso2-axis2 repository. Shall we move

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-02 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Supun, These are SNAPSHOTs and promoting to nexus will help the other developers when building. All, I have remove the dependencies out of the kernel and its building now. Maheshika, Can we trigger a carbon4-kernel build. Please add the following dependencies to be build before building the

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-02 Thread Supun Malinga
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Supun, These are SNAPSHOTs and promoting to nexus will help the other developers when building. All, I have remove the dependencies out of the kernel and its building now. Maheshika, Can we trigger a

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-02 Thread Maheshika Goonetilleke
Hi Sagara I'm trying to create a plan for wso2-wss4j. However, I'm unable to create as the GITHub repo is not visible while trying to configure the plan. Please advice on this. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Supun, These are SNAPSHOTs and

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-01 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Sagara, Came up with a blocking situation where axis2 orbit using the transports dependencies and transports using axis2 dependency, where it makes a cyclic dependency. That means the axis2 orbit have to build after building the transports. So can we move the transports into the axis2 module?

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-01 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara, Came up with a blocking situation where axis2 orbit using the transports dependencies and transports using axis2 dependency, where it makes a cyclic dependency. That means the axis2 orbit have to build

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-01 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Sagara, Shall I move the transports to the modules/transport in axis2 code, where actual code should be? thanks Eranda On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Sagara Gunathunga sag...@wso2.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara,

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-02-01 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Sagara, Shall I move the transports to the modules/transport in axis2 code, where actual code should be? +1 Please take a look here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/axis/axis2/java/core/trunk/modules/transport/

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-31 Thread Krishantha Samaraweera
Hi Eranda, AdminServiceVerification test fails due to a NPE while accessing to message context. Need to check this further with Kernel team. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Krishantha, Here is the location for the carbon

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-31 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Azeez, Sagara, I had a problem with wss4j [1] where it didn't had a modular structure to fit the orbit in (packaging of root pom was bundle). So I have introduced a parent pom and add the current wss4j as a module of it. Is this the correct way of doing that or what should I need to correct?

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-31 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Azeez, Sagara, I had a problem with wss4j [1] where it didn't had a modular structure to fit the orbit in (packaging of root pom was bundle). So I have introduced a parent pom and add the current wss4j as a module

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-29 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Krishantha, Here is the location for the carbon kernel and the orbit. For now I have configured to ignore the test failures. Please remove it after fixing the issue. Orbit https://github.com/wso2/orbit Kernel https://github.com/wso2/carbon4-kernel thanks Eranda On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-26 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi all, I merged and moved the kernel code to github in [1]. Now it is building and passing tests 24/1/0 where verifyAdminServiceSecurityTest class: org.wso2.carbon.integration.tests test is failing and I am currently looking in to it. Another concern is that we need to have an orbit location for

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-26 Thread Kishanthan Thangarajah
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, I merged and moved the kernel code to github in [1]. Now it is building and passing tests 24/1/0 where verifyAdminServiceSecurityTest class: org.wso2.carbon.integration.tests test is failing and I am

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-26 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Kicha, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kishanthan Thangarajah kishant...@wso2.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, I merged and moved the kernel code to github in [1]. Now it is building and passing tests 24/1/0 where

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-21 Thread Kishanthan Thangarajah
We already have a repo with the name carbon-kernel, where the C5 work is being carried. So this 4.x kernel repo should be of a different name. Lets name it as carbon4-kernel After that, we can move the components found under core to the components category. And all the features to features

[Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-20 Thread Afkham Azeez
$subject -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * http://www.apache.org/* *email: **az...@wso2.com* az...@wso2.com * cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org*http://blog.afkham.org *twitter:

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-20 Thread Eranda Sooriyabandara
Hi Azeez, +1. We will add it to our porting plan. thanks Eranda On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: $subject -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ *

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-20 Thread Afkham Azeez
I think the AppServer team needs to do a kernel 4.3.0 release because they need to upgrade Tomcat for WebSockets support. One option is to move the kernel to GitHub and do the release from there. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Azeez, +1. We

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-20 Thread Supun Malinga
Hi, So this will be starting from kernel 4.2.0 or we have to wait till kernel trunk is ready?. thanks, On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: I think the AppServer team needs to do a kernel 4.3.0 release because they need to upgrade Tomcat for WebSockets

Re: [Dev] We will also need to move Carbon 4.x kernel to GitHub

2014-01-20 Thread Kishanthan Thangarajah
We will have to move the current kernel branch (4.2.0) with components updated with latest kernel patches. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote: Hi, So this will be starting from kernel 4.2.0 or we have to wait till kernel trunk is ready?. thanks, On