Re: multijdkdirs

2016-02-11 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Stack wrote: > > That sounds great Allen. So --multijdktests="compile", if we had jdk7 and > jdk8 for our jdks, would compile using 7 and 8 but then the 'default' would > be used to do the general suite (javadoc, unittests, etc.) Yes, exactly.

Re: multijdkdirs

2016-02-11 Thread Stack
That sounds great Allen. So --multijdktests="compile", if we had jdk7 and jdk8 for our jdks, would compile using 7 and 8 but then the 'default' would be used to do the general suite (javadoc, unittests, etc.) Thanks sir, St.Ack On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] YETUS-291: Change the logo?

2016-02-11 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > are we doing approval voting[1] or something else? > > > [1] http://electology.org/approval-voting > Yes.

Re: multijdkdirs

2016-02-11 Thread Allen Wittenauer
Just to follow up on this, I’ve uploaded a patch for YETUS-297 that will allow users to select which individual subsystems/tests should use MultiJDK mode if those tests are aware of it. By default, Yetus enables it for compile, unit, and javadoc. Using —multijdktests=“javadoc” would m