Re: [DISCUSS] Inclusive language: change git default branch name

2023-01-27 Thread Weiwei Yang
Let's decide this with Apache way and vote to a consensus. I am -1 on this. If this is an effortless change, I will be +0, but this needs a ton of effort. Also lots of implications we couldn't even realize today. I don't think we need to debate if the "master" word is offensive or not, this is

Re: [DISCUSS] Inclusive language: change git default branch name

2023-01-27 Thread Craig Condit
This will probably be an unpopular opinion, but I’m -1 on this. I agree with being inclusive where it makes sense, however this whole “master vs. main” controversy is rooted in an idea that is ill-informed, ill-conceived, and provides no technical benefit. I’ll make my case as follows: 1.

[DISCUSS] Inclusive language: change git default branch name

2023-01-26 Thread Wilfred Spiegelenburg
The naming of our default branch master, while very common, can be seen as offensive. I would like to propose that after the release of YuniKorn 1.2 we rename our default branch from master to "trunk". There are other options like: "main" or "development". We cannot execute the rename ourselves