Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1104
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1117
[ZEPPELIN-1086] Auto Completion for Interpreter.
### What is this PR for?
This PR is to support auto-completion for interpreter.
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1105
@r-kamath that's good point, but that differs according to use cases (also
as a workaround, possible to set those before switching to `offline link`).
from point of view having `offline vie
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1104
re-trigger CI
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1104
[ZEPPELIN-1078] Does not show the text result in the paragraph sometimes.
### What is this PR for?
This PR fixes the problem that does not show the text result in the
paragraph sometimes.
The vote passes with 6 binding +1 votes, 12 non-binding +1 votes,
and 1 binding +0, 1 non-binding +0 votes,
no -1 votes. Thanks for everyone who verified rc and voted.
+1:
Alexander Bezzubov
*
Federico Valeri
DuyHai Doan
Hyung Sung Shim
Victor Manuel Garcia
Prabhjyot Singh*
Bruno Bonnin
An
Yes, now works fine, but additional reviews are welcome.
Il 02 lug 2016 8:24 PM, "Leemoonsoo" ha scritto:
> Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
>
> https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
>
> LGTM. If someone behind proxy can provide additional review, that
> would be help
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1116
minor doc fix
### What is this PR for?
java doc fix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/incubator-zeppel
We could follow up separately, I think we should at least include md and sh -
they are small and if spark is there I think they should too. Just a thought.
_
From: mina lee mailto:mina...@apache.org>>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Zeppe
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
LGTM. If someone behind proxy can provide additional review, that would be
helpful.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/836
Addressed comment from @bzz. @anish18sun Thanks for taking a look.
Now CI is green and i'll keep this PR open in this weekend for further
reviews. if there're no further discussions, the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1115
Ready to review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
@Leemoonsoo Please review this PR. You were the reviewer of previous PRs.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1115
[ZEPPELIN-1099] Build and run Spark without spark-dependencies
### What is this PR for?
When users use SPARK_HOME, they won't want to include spark-dependencies.
This PR makes it possible an
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-1099:
--
Summary: Build and run Spark without spark-dependencies
Key: ZEPPELIN-1099
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1099
Project: Zeppelin
Iss
Github user fvaleri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
Sure, reported in PR description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
The failure is irrelevant. @fvaleri Could you please link the previous work
to refer it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1104
@corneadoug Thank you for making clear. I fixed the code as you advised.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user fvaleri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
@jongyoul ok, thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/987
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/987
I'll make a new PR after I finish some preceding tasks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1025
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
It's very helpful to edit your title with [DOC] prefix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user fvaleri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1114
Proxy build - removed Bower note
### What is this PR for?
Final version of the proxy setup paragraph on main README.
Removed Bower note beacuse it works with the last checkout from master.
Hello,
Thanks for taking care of it.
JL
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Prabhjyot Singh
wrote:
> Hi Jongyoul,
>
> It happened while merging https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1109. I
> re-checked the commit, content that got merged is right but message is
> wrong.
>
> Have reverted old c
Hello Prabhjyot,
I've saw your last commit into branch-0.6. BTW, it looks like something
wrong because the message of this commit is "merge master into branch-0.6".
Could you please fix it? simply, you revert that commit and cherry-pick the
same commit from master.
Regards,
JL
--
이종열, Jongyoul
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1113
@jongyoul Sure, I will do that.
I have a question. Is it okay that wrong interpreter is ignored in
[here](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1113/files#diff-0f40daff726ba29c9a004b342d422df
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1113
I just refactor NoteInterpreter to merge into InterpreterFactory. Could you
please rebase it to resolve conflict?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/930
No. I just wonder if this is not merged even if it passes CI for a long
time ago.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1110
On Mac OSx the shortcut is CMD+,
Tested LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user mwkang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1113
[ZEPPELIN-1069]Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong
interpreter name
### What is this PR for?
Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name
linked to http
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/930
pong :) I don't see any solution for this. Does this issue bother anyone
else?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
35 matches
Mail list logo
