jeff anderson created ZEPPELIN-1156:
---
Summary: Frontend display long integer incorrectly
Key: ZEPPELIN-1156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1156
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Mina Lee created ZEPPELIN-1155:
--
Summary: Table is not rendered on second run
Key: ZEPPELIN-1155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1155
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/993
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
@lresende Awesome!
Tested and Looks good to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
I found several slides about zeppelin, but all of them are about the usage
of zeppelin. I am reading the zeppelin code and would like to contribute on
that. Is there any material about the internal architecture of zeppelin.
especially how the interpreter and display system work together. how to
pingping shang created ZEPPELIN-1154:
Summary: %md error: connection refused
Key: ZEPPELIN-1154
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1154
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
@Leemoonsoo All green again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1161
Looks good to me.
Merging if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1162
Current CI failure:
```
org.apache.zeppelin.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchInterpreterTest
org.apache.zeppelin.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchInterpreterTest Time
elapsed: 8.15 sec <<<
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
If each interpreter has a separate settings for Kerberos, eg.
shell.keytab.location, would it be harder to manage?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Babu Prasad Elumalai created ZEPPELIN-1153:
--
Summary: Google BigQuery Interpreter for Apache Zeppelin
Key: ZEPPELIN-1153
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1153
Project:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1165
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1165
Merge it in master (and branch-0.6 while #1151 is merged in branch-0.6) as
a hotfix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1165
[HOTFIX] build fail after merge #1151
### What is this PR for?
#1151 has been created created before #1139 merge.
#1151 was passing CI but it's failing in master with #1139 merged.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1151
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rconline opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
[ZEPPELIN-1149] %sh interpreter kerberos support
### What is this PR for?
Zeppelin Shell interpreter should work in a Kerberos environment
### What type of PR is it?
Github user AhyoungRyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user AhyoungRyu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1161
[ZEPPELIN-906] Apply new mechanism to AlluxioInterpreter
### What is this PR for?
This PR applies the [new interpreter registration
Github user rconlinehwx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
LGTM.
@jongyoul Typically I use an ambari created 3 node cluster and then follow
these instructions to setup my kerberos -
Github user rconlinehwx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1155
LGTM. @jongyoul Typically I use an ambari created 3 cluster setup and then
follow these instructions to setup my kerberos -
Github user davidtzoor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1135
@corneadoug are the build errors due to my code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1159
I don't have a strong view on any, fine either way. Just that I thought
authcBasic should work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1162
[ZEPPELIN-909] Apply new mechanism to Elasticsearch interpreter
### What is this PR for?
This PR applies the [new interpreter registration
GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1161
[ZEPPELIN-906] Apply new mechanism to AlluxioInterpreter
### What is this PR for?
This PR applies the [new interpreter registration
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/993
@prabhjyotsingh Since #1100 was merged into master, I updated
`credential.controler.js`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1159
@prabhjyotsingh If we can remove it, then maybe it would be nice to do so
in the future.
Especially since it makes the code more complicated.
For now, let's go with #1140
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
Ci is green, merging if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1159
Agreed @corneadoug. Thought we don't have `authcBasic` in our doc, but
whoever knows or had used shiro in past can choose to use it, and IMO whatever
features shiro provides we should be
GitHub user corneadoug reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
Block all routes except Home when user isn't logged
### What is this PR for?
When user isn't logged while the auth is activated, we are hiding the
notebooks and most of the menus.
Github user corneadoug closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
CI doesn't seem related, but still gonna retrigger it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1159
@prabhjyotsingh Oh, that's tricky, my initial comment was about authc.
The fun thing is that authcBasic isn't even in the doc, nor as choice in
the shiro.ini anymore. Do we still need
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1160
WIP [Zeppelin - 1152] Listing note revision history
### What is this PR for?
This PR addresses ability to view the history of note revisions from the
`version control` menu
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1152:
-
Summary: Listing note revision history
Key: ZEPPELIN-1152
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1152
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
François Rosière created ZEPPELIN-1151:
--
Summary: No way to access interpreter properties from z context
Key: ZEPPELIN-1151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1151
Project:
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
Tried new changes works well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1153
LGTM! minor suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1147
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
41 matches
Mail list logo
