Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1170
CI build failed due to networking issues
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.4:process (default) on
project zeppelin: Error
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1194
So what do you guys suggest we do @corneadoug @lresende ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1233
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user prasadwagle reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
[ZEPPELIN-1246] In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
getMaxConcurrentConnection instead of hardcoding maxConcurrency to 10
### What is this PR for?
In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
Github user prasadwagle closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1210
@mwpenny Sorry for the delay, I got a bit busy.
I will take a look this week-end. What you can do until then is to rebase
with master since there is some conflicts right now.
---
If your
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1218
@bzz @corneadoug
Okay, Thank you very much
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Mina Lee created ZEPPELIN-1249:
--
Summary: Set Scala 2.11 to default scala version
Key: ZEPPELIN-1249
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1249
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Task
jacquesqiao created ZEPPELIN-1248:
-
Summary: DAG paragraph of paragraphs
Key: ZEPPELIN-1248
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1248
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: New Feature
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1221
I removed URLs from all child pom. Merge if there is no further comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1220
Merge if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1247:
Summary: JdbcInterpreter is always chosen as the default
interpreter.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1247
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1247
Project: Zeppelin
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1225
@Leemoonsoo in 0.6 or 0.6.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1232
I also compare it with native python repl, the second case is consistent.
So I think this behvior is fine, although it is different from jyputer.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1232
@Leemoonsoo Thanks for the careful checking. I compare it with jupyter,
only the second case is different. Let me investigate how to fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user prasadwagle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1240
[ZEPPELIN-1246] In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
getMaxConcurrentConnection instead of hardcoding maxConcurrency to 10
### What is this PR for?
In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
Prasad Wagle created ZEPPELIN-1246:
--
Summary: In JDBCInterpreter.getScheduler, use
getMaxConcurrentConnection instead of hardcoding maxConcurrency to 10
Key: ZEPPELIN-1246
URL:
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@bzz only difference between this and last was squash of commit. all fails
are related to downloading dependencies still.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user babupe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1170
Awesome! Merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1201
LGTM.
CI failure is flaky one. i've seen it couple of times.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1236
@r-kamath have implement your feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1201
Thanks. I'll merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1233
Merging this if no more discussion. CI fails for unrelated issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1234
@SachinJanani Could you please add test case for this bug? It would help
understand the situation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1226
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1201
I've seen it for the first time. Do you have any hint to deal with?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1233
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
I'll trigger the CI one more, and merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1232
Thanks @zjffdu for great improvement.
I have tested bit and i could see some inconsistent behavior.
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
Thanks for the fix. Tested and LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
@bzz and @jongyoul
OK, so two things I think have happened. (In case some thing like this
happens again).
When I rebased, some version of ZeppelinClusterTest.java that had the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1239
@Leemoonsoo I fixed it. Review it, please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
@bzz Sure, I agree. it's kind of separate issue. I think enforcing code
format at first supporting formatter later would be a good plan. How about you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1245:
--
Summary: Focus first paragraph after notebook creation
Key: ZEPPELIN-1245
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1245
Project: Zeppelin
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1233
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1215
Thanks @zjffdu for the contribution.
LGTM. Tested, CI failure irrelevant.
Merge it into master and branch-0.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1225
LGTM. Can we merge it into branch-0.6 as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1228
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1238
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1238
Thanks for the prompt review, merging if there is no further discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1238
Merging it ASAP as a hotfix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/5a4aacef25b0b54d151cfc7a3ea81cc312f6f655#commitcomment-18428447
In jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/jdbc/JDBCInterpreter.java:
In
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
Do you think we should merge it as is and address eclipse formatter in the
separate issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1218
@cloverhearts Don't hesitate to ping me when you start making the small PRs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1235
Looks great to me, modulo CI failure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1237
Build fails due to network issue.
```
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1206
Close it and merge it to #1237
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1237
@prabhjyotsingh I close #1206, and merge it here. Please help review,
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
50 matches
Mail list logo
