Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1430
@vensant I don't really get why the error is being triggered this way.
We are talking about the file size, but we show the error when the
Websocket connection is cut.
One example
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1433
@Leemoonsoo Thank you for pointing out the problem. Let me check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
@mwkang If you rebase again, the Error 2. Should be fixed.
Error 1. should just be a random one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Greg Senia created ZEPPELIN-1472:
Summary: Create new LdapRealm based on Apache Knox LdapRealm Class
Key: ZEPPELIN-1472
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1472
Project: Zeppelin
Sorry I forgot to add the stack trace:
ERROR [2016-09-22 03:57:45,567] ({Thread-482}
NotebookServer.java[broadcast]:320) - socket error
java.io.IOException: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Idle timeout
expired: 30/30 ms
at
Hi All,
I was working on zeppelin and my zeppelin server was running for more than
24 hours.I am getting "Blocking message pending 1 for blocking " error
intermittently when running the paragraph,but after waiting for some time
these error disappears is this a known issue?
Regards,
Sachin
Github user corneadoug closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/544
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1443
Changes done.
Merging if there is no other discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1434
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1384
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1433
@astroshim Currently only the last display system directive (%text, %html,
...) in the output is effective. Which is behavior of both InterpreterResult
(static output) and InterpreterOutput
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1440
Tested and it works well!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user minahlee closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
nirav patel created ZEPPELIN-1471:
-
Summary: Expose default SparkSession as a variable for spark 2.0
build
Key: ZEPPELIN-1471
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1471
Project:
GitHub user spektom opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1447
[ZEPPELIN-1293] Re-create Livy session if it's lost
### What is this PR for?
This patch restarts Livy session when it's lost.
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement/Bug Fix
This sounds very interesting indeed.
Could you please explain a bit more what do you meen?
I think some work in similar direction has been done by Jeremy and few
other members of IBM group.
--
Alex
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, 09:20 shivani firodiya
wrote:
> Yes, I
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1438
Merge if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1470:
Summary: Freezing (Hang) 현상에 대한 확인이 필요합니다.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1470
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1470
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Yes, I would be happy to be a part of it
Shivani
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Satish Abburi
wrote:
>
> All, we are exploring the options to develop UI for feedback loop to model
> output. Would like to know the feasibility of doing this by extending
> Zeppelin.
>
>
All, we are exploring the options to develop UI for feedback loop to model
output. Would like to know the feasibility of doing this by extending Zeppelin.
Appreciate any input.
Thanks,
Satish
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1438
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1399
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1404
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1469:
Summary: notebook isolate 옵션이 추가되면 좋겠습니다.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1469
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1469
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: New
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1468:
Summary: For each of the para graphs I hope you can be independent
permissions.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1468
Project:
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1433
@corneadoug Thank you for your review. I just re-based.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Hi Mina,
Thanks for the reply.
I finally found the source of the error, it was due to an error in the
build configuration (the interpreter was not linked to the right class
name) when using the new method to register the interpreter.
Thanks for trying to reproduce it.
I will consider sharing our
Vitaliy Zinchenko created ZEPPELIN-1466:
---
Summary: Load jar doesn't work in %dep interpreter in 0.6.1 version
Key: ZEPPELIN-1466
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1466
Project:
Hi Aurélien,
If you have used interpeter-setting.json for 0.6.0, I believe there is not
much of changes you need to make for 0.6.1.
interpreterGroup information is read either from interpreter-setting.json
under interpreter/{customInterpreterGroupName}
or interpreter-setting.json included in
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1446
ZEPPELIN-1263. Should specify zeppelin's spark configuration through --conf
arguments of spark-submit
### What is this PR for?
For now we spark configuration at runtime rather than pass
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
@corneadoug Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1302
@astroshim Can you rebase so that we can check the CI?
I will merge after it's green
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1433
@astroshim Tested, nice fix. LGTM
Can you rebase to have a green CI?
@Leemoonsoo @jongyoul @felixcheung Can one of you guys take a quick look at
the code?
---
If your project is set
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1408
Tested with the new instructions.
But, while I do get the error message, it is still running the query
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1434
@AhyoungRyu Test, Nice Improvements
Can you just rebase to have a green CI?
After that, Merging if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1431
Tested LGTM
@astroshim Can you just rebase? That should make the CI green
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
36 matches
Mail list logo