Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1461
@AhyoungRyu Rebasing from master should fix the CI issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
cool. will merge this if there are no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
Hi @cloverhearts. Thanks for the improvement!
I just tested and got some small feedbacks :)
1. Is there any particular reason to have dropdown menu next to the filter
bar? If so, s
Github user minahlee closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1486
Tested, it fixes the bug. Btw do we need this patch only in branch-0.6 not
to master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
@corneadoug
sorry, could you please review for this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1461
@corneadoug Thanks! I retriggered CI just for sure. After checking CI then
will merge this :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1461
@AhyoungRyu Tested, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1488
Thanks. LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1490
@corneadoug i commented translation on the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1490
[ZEPPELIN-1480] Blocking message pending 1 for BLOCKING
### What is this PR for?
This patch try to address problem described in ZEPPELIN-1480
### What type of PR is it?
Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1490
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user corneadoug reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
Fix version of cachebust
### What is this PR for?
A dependency update of grunt-cache-bust is breaking the build.
https://github.com/hollandben/grunt-cache-bust/issues/204
So fixin
Github user corneadoug closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1490
@Leemoonsoo That Jira issue is in Korean, could you update the PR
description so that there is more details on what the problem is and what is
the expected result of that test before and after
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
Merging this directly as a hotfix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1491
Fix version of cachebust
### What is this PR for?
A dependency update of grunt-cache-bust is breaking the build.
So fixing the dependency version
### What type of PR is it
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1363
@Peilin-Yang Yes, you will need to rebase first though
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
[ ZEPPELIN-967 ] Implement search bar in job manager
### What is this PR for?
A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
First time? Check out the c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1484
Merging it into branch-0.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1483
@jongyoul, what about merging this as it is, and create another jira issue
for removing Spark 1.1, 1.2 test and see how community think about removing it?
---
If your project is set up for it, y
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1490
[ZEPPELIN-1480] Blocking message pending 1 for BLOCKING
### What is this PR for?
This patch try to address problem described in ZEPPELIN-1480
### What type of PR is it?
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/133
@doanduyhai I see. Thanks for the explanation.
Current master branch works with both scala-2.10 and scala-2.11 without
rebuild, depending on which version of spark SPARK_HOME points. is
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
@AhyoungRyu sorry I missed it. Will go ahead and add all the licenses.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user hayssams commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1479
@Leemoonsoo Just pushed the changes to make hadoop lib provided.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user Peilin-Yang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1363
@corneadoug merged your PR.
Do you think now it is the good time to merge this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487
Ready to review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
@Leemoonsoo 8f9006a
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/133
@Leemoonsoo
Yes we do need this patch because `DisplayUtils` has been disabled
temporarily because of the issue it causes. This patch fixes the issue and
re-enable `DisplayUtils`
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/133
master branch runs
```
val wbIPR=Array(8.40, 8.09, 7.56, 6.83, 5.88,
4.72, 3.36, 1.78, 0.0)
val
pressureIPR=Array(0.00,1000.00,2000.0
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1479
Thanks for the contribution.
How about let user set not only `HADOOP_CONF_DIR` but also `HADOOP_HOME` in
conf/zeppelin-env.sh to use HDFS notebook storage?
Then hadoop dependen
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
Tested on local, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1483
nice ! LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1483
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1484
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1486
Thanks @mvitaly for the contribution!
Looks good to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1483
@minahlee Thank you for your effort!! :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
@Leemoonsoo sure. will update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
Shell we have an entry for this change in [upgrading
section](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/docs/install/upgrade.md#upgrading-from-zeppelin-06-to-07)?
---
If your project is s
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
Travis failure is unrelated and only on one of the build profile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Ivan Savin created ZEPPELIN-1522:
Summary: Not correct (change) display of the height of diagram in
IE
Key: ZEPPELIN-1522
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1522
Project: Zeppelin
Ivan Savin created ZEPPELIN-1521:
Summary: Not correct display of the lower axe in Chrome
Key: ZEPPELIN-1521
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1521
Project: Zeppelin
Issue T
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1489
ZEPPELIN-1321 Zeppelin HTTP and HTTPS port should be managed seperately
### What is this PR for?
Use a different variable for ssl port number
- add new property for ssl port
###
GitHub user sixmen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1488
[ZEPPELIN-1519] Fix notebook importer AM/PM omission problem
### What is this PR for?
When loading note from storage (or importing note), AM/PM informations are
gone. So dates are always in AM
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
code rebase
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Hi Jongyoul,
I strongly agree that changing requirement of JDK version is definitely
breaking change. May be better to treat it to separate issue.
I just think it's good food for thought, not meant to do it now. If
Zeppelin project plans to have major version (1.0.0 finally), that would be
a chanc
Hello Jungtaek,
I agree that it's relatively easy to run Zeppelin with JDK 8 because
Zeppelin is not linked with another project directly. But as you told, it
bothers admin or system engineer, sometimes it's impossible for some
reasons. Thus personally, we should keep backward compatibility.
On W
I also think there's also many places to use old version of JDK in
production. But unlike library projects, Zeppelin doesn't become dependency
of other projects, so no need to consider other projects and also users'
own projects, which greatly lowers the barrier.
Installing JDK/JRE 8 and using it f
53 matches
Mail list logo
