Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1637
All work is done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666
Indeed, if you could check #1659 - AFAIK it does all the same, only the
node version is different there.
How about we merge this guy as it does not bring major changes and then
rebase #1659 o
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666
I think we can merge this first and then rebase #1659 easily :)
This PR looks good to me and is what we want :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666
ð Looks good to me, merging if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1666
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
@asanjar node version is bumped to 6.x TLS one, please let us know if that
works for you you on Power arch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1339
ping ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1566
@zjffdu i updated description and pushed some changes. as you can see from
screenshot it makes usage of current `username` when writing to hdfs. So in the
example above, although `out_user1
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
rebased to resolve conflict with #1666
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1668
[WIP] chore/centralize maven pom versions
I am trying to centralising versions of libraries, plugins in pom.xml. (I
need powerful CI to test this PR continuously)
You can merge this pull req
Github user akhiluanandh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/228
@corneadoug
No plans to continue it in the near future. I'll close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user akhiluanandh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/228
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660
@jongyoul thanks for starting work on it! one more question. with current
implementation in case of refreshing the page, user will get last run note
right? so for example, if `user2` runs
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
[ZEPPELIN-1667] Fix maven options while updating node, npm packages
### What is this PR for?
Update maven plugin, node vesion, npm package and fix tests to make #1639
pass CI
#
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1659
retrigger CI due to failures of irrelevant tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Christian Luttazi created ZEPPELIN-1696:
---
Summary: Cassandra interpreter does not have pagination
Key: ZEPPELIN-1696
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1696
Project: Zeppelin
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
HOT FIX: Fix NPE while getting default interpreter setting
### What is this PR for?
NPE while starting Zeppelin for the first time without interpreter settings
### What type of PR is
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1667
5 times of CI test passed. Merging it as hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
I've seen it quite a few times. thanks for the fix, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Khalid Huseynov created ZEPPELIN-1697:
-
Summary: ZeppelinHub storage layer websocket connection is broken
Key: ZEPPELIN-1697
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1697
Project: Zeppel
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539
[ZEPPELIN-1567] Let JDBC interpreter use user credential information.
### What is this PR for?
This PR is for the multi-tenant of JDBC Interpreter.
User can create a user/pas
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
Test failed, but not irrelevant with this PR
```
// https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/jobs/177967999
// https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/177967999/log.txt?deansi=true
14:4
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1698:
--
Summary: Restrict of interpreter setting on GUI for each
interpreter.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1698
Project: Zeppel
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1699:
--
Summary: Unify AngularObjectRegistry and ResourcePool with
AccessControl
Key: ZEPPELIN-1699
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1699
Project: Zepp
Github user dennishuo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/923
@shijinkui was it intentional to specify jets3t.version=0.9.0 in the
hadoop-2.7 profile even though all the other profiles (including hadoop-2.6)
already specify jets3t.version=0.9.3?
---
If yo
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660
@jongyoul Could you describe more about the personalized mode? I don't
think current implementation is anywhere close to personalized mode discussed
in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZE
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654
CI Green now. please review this.
Once it's merged, i'd like to add some tutorials that leverage this feature.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
LGTM and merge to master as a hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539
Tested and LGTM.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1538
@mfelgamal
Hi :) ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user shijinkui closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/924
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user shijinkui reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1026
[ZEPPELIN-1021] delete reduplicate dependency and add scala version
properties
### What is this PR for?
1. reduplicate dependency
2. scala version properties
### What type of PR i
Github user shijinkui closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1026
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654
LGTM. Looking forward to see more interesting use cases for this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1665
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user karup1990 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663
Ready for review @Leemoonsoo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Shim HyungSung created ZEPPELIN-1700:
Summary: org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
java.net.ConnectException
Key: ZEPPELIN-1700
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1700
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670
[ZEPPELIN-1700] ConnectException between ZeppelinServer and
RemoteInterpreterProcess.
### What is this PR for?
The default value of interpreter connection timeout is 30s but sometimes 30
s
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670
@astroshim Thanks for the contribution.
Could you edit default value from
[here](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-zengine/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/conf/Z
Hi
I updated the wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap
Please feel free to give more suggestions about the roadmap any time.
I think roadmap doesn't mean the community will reject items not on the
roadmap, it's more like showing where the primary focus of t
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322
Sorry for late comment. I was in vacation in the last 2 weeks. I found
this didn't work for spark interpreter. @prabhjyotsingh Did you try it for
spark interpreter and other interpreters ?
---
I
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670
@Leemoonsoo Oh sorry, I didn't know that the value is configurable.
If modification is possible, It's better to close this PR because 30s is
okay in normal case.
Thank you!
---
If your
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
If I read it correctly, this PR assume each interpreter setting has one
spark ui url ? But I think this is wrong assumption, as we may have multiple
spark applications for single interpreter settin
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
```
05:33:43,422 INFO alluxio.logger.type:202 - Connecting to local worker @
testing-docker-d2b67f49-f525-4c23-a9ab-36aafddcf032/172.17.0.12:42241
05:33:43,422 ERROR alluxio.logger.type:212
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
@zjffdu Right. Isolated mode can create multiple spark applications.
@karup1990 @zjffdu how can we handle multiple spark applications?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654
Thanks @felixcheung for the review. Merge to mater if there is no more
comment!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
I think the right place to put spark ui link is in note page instead of
interpreter setting page.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322
@zjffdu Yes, you are right, with SPARK_HOME/SPARK_SUBMIT it doesn't work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1322
Then I think we should either revert this PR or fix it for spark
interpreter as well. Because spark interpreter is the most important
interpreter of zeppelin IMO.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
Make sense. @karup1990 what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663
Let me review this PR and then give you some feedbacks. Thanks @karup1990
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
@Mleekko
Thanks for contribution.
A. CI failure is not related to this PR
```
// https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/176444213/log.txt?deansi=true
17:44:25,594 ER
Prabhjyot Singh created ZEPPELIN-1701:
-
Summary: User impersonation of front end user does not work with
SPARK_HOME set.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1701
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1701
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1671
Clean unnecessary codes
### What is this PR for?
This PR is for cleaning unnecessary codes.
### What type of PR is it?
Refactoring
### Questions:
* Does the license
Github user karup1990 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
@zjffdu @Leemoonsoo Thanks for letting me know.
I will make the changes to handle isolated scope as well and create a PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
CI is green, please review otherwise merging it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user anthonycorbacho reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
[ZEPPELIN-1690] - ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo multy user handling
### What is this PR for?
This PR bring multi user handling to ZeppelinHubNotebookRepo.
### What type of PR is
Github user anthonycorbacho closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
ZEPPELIN-1701: User impersonation not work with SPARK_HOME set.
### What is this PR for?
User impersonation of front end user does not work with SPARK_HOME set.
### What type o
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
thanks for the fix, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1596
@Leemoonsoo I think putting `open()` in `jobRun` or `hook` is the same.
Because hooks are also executed in `jobRun()`. Actually my intention is to pass
`AuthenticationInfo` to `open()`, so that li
66 matches
Mail list logo
