Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1861
merging if no more comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
@Leemoonsoo @jongyoul Any comments for this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1898
[TBD] set cron job executor to current user by default
### What is this PR for?
currently when executing cron job, backend doesn't know who initiated cron
job (with subsequent save) u
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
[HOTFIX : ZEPPELIN-1932] paragraph blur error
### What is this PR for?
When one or more hidden editors are present, clicking on the editor will
cause a blur error.
This means that
GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1896
implementation test case for connect to exists interpreter process
### What is this PR for?
We need test case for remote interpreter process ( connect to exists
process)
### W
Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1896
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user soralee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1892
Thanks for review and considering the side effect @minahlee :+1:
You're right! I missed this option.
As your mention, I checked `ZEPPELIN_SERVER_CONTEXT_PATH` option.
**Test
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
@cloverhearts update looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1897
Can't remove interpreter repository.
### What is this PR for?
It can't be delete the `interpreter
repository`(http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.0-SNAPSHOT/manual/dependencymanagement.html
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1890
@jongyoul you are right, `-Pr` does nothing in `create_release.sh`, so I
removed it in a97b5fe. I kept `-Pr` in `publish_release.sh` though for the one
who uses zeppelin-zrinterpreter_2.1x.jar in
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1879
@minahlee Okay, I will take look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1896
implementation test case for connect to exists interpreter process
### What is this PR for?
We need test case for remote interpreter process ( connect to exists
process)
### Wha
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1884
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1858
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1873
@epahomov Thanks for the contribution.
I'm trying to understand what cause this problem, because
`zeppelin-zengine` shouldn't be a dependency of any interpreter and `/lib`
directory su
Cool, thanks!
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Mina Lee wrote:
> Hi Ashwin,
>
> we still have some issues that need to be handled before release,
> hopefully most of them are in review process which will take 2-3 more days.
> I am going to start release vote next week, so I expect we will be abl
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
Thanks @1ambda for the fix. Thanks @zjffdu for reviewing and verifying.
It looks good to me, while it provides more consistent behavior between
`PysparkInterpreter` and `SPARK_HOME/bin/
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1895
[HOTFIX] Improve stability of sync when get fails
### What is this PR for?
This is to improve the stability of sync mechanism when `get` from some
backend storage fails (e.g. corrupt f
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1842
@AhyoungRyu Thanks for the review. Great to see High chart working nicely.
A lot more improvements on Helium menu will be required, like search page,
grouping packages by type, package
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1868
LGTM and merge to master if no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1894
@robbinspg Great fix!
CI failure looks not related.
LGTM and merge to master, branch-0.7, branch-0.6 if no more comments!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1842
@Leemoonsoo Thanks! I just suggested to have some default message like
other pages (e.g. localhost:8080/#/interpreter -> there is "Manage interpreters
settings. You can create / edit / remove s
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
Flaky test may be another concurrency issue in scheduler execute jobs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
GitHub user robbinspg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1894
[ZEPPELIN-1560] avoid generating minus sign in package name
### What is this PR for?
using Object.hashCode() as part of the REPL wrapper class name can cause a
compilation error as hashCode
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
I'm not sure, this PR is intent to fix the dead lock issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1890
@minahlee I think `-Pr` doesn't mean anything because users cannot run R
interpreter since `-Psparkr` is enabled. How about removing `-Pr` in a script?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
Does this PR resolve flaky test that current master encounters?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Hello Everyone
This email is to tell you about ASF participation at FOSDEM. The event
will be held in Brussels on 4^th & 5^th February 2017 and we are hoping
that many people from our ASF projects will be there.
https://fosdem.org/2017/
Attending FOSDEM is completely free and the ASF will ag
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1892
This fix will bring same issue in production mode if user set
`ZEPPELIN_SERVER_CONTEXT_PATH`. Do you have any other idea to work around?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1889
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1889
Yup merge into both master and branch-0.7 if there are no more comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Hi Ashwin,
we still have some issues that need to be handled before release,
hopefully most of them are in review process which will take 2-3 more days.
I am going to start release vote next week, so I expect we will be able to
deliver Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 end of next week or a week later.
On Th
GitHub user soralee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1892
[MINOR] broken logo url in web dev mode
### What is this PR for?
zeppelin logo image (zepLogo.png) is broken in `web dev` mode like below
screenshot.
![screenshot from 2017-01-12
14-50-3
GitHub user sixmen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1893
[ZEPPELIN-451] Save codes and messages as multi-line
### What is this PR for?
Save Paragraph texts and result msgs as array of strings instead of one
long string.
One long strings are not
Github user sixmen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
It seems CI has a network issue
```
[ERROR] Error requesting archive.
[ERROR] Status: 503
[ERROR] Request options: {
[ERROR] "uri":
"https://github.com/Medium/phantomj
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1891
we already a test case for this
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/9e75f5b50ac1573d423fa937b801df77d6a36f3c/zeppelin-zengine/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppelin/notebook/NotebookTest.jav
40 matches
Mail list logo
