Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

+1 on quality and stabilization. I'm not sure if releasing as preview or calling it unstable fits with the ASF release process though. Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. - do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 I tested two scenarios that you described and both(turn on & off Shiro) are working well. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2163: [ZEPPELIN-2287] Add more test to ensure 'RunOnSelectio...

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2163 I rebased but failed again in Selenium test. All test cases that I added passed in my local but it's failed in here. Seem I need to do something more to avoid this.. --- If your project is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2112: [ZEPPELIN-2228] precode for SparkRInterpreter

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2112 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2112: [ZEPPELIN-2228] precode for SparkRInterpreter

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2112 [ZEPPELIN-2228] precode for SparkRInterpreter ### What is this PR for? Added parameter zeppelin.pyspark.precode to SparkRInterpreter. This is snippet of code which executes when

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompletene...

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with replaced context parameters ### What is this PR for? Adds posibility to use context parameters (types: String.class, Double.class,

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompletene...

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompleteness of data ### What is this PR for? Added notification about exceeding the limit in the result. ### What type of PR is it?

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @Leemoonsoo it works, thx! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL ### What is this PR for? Exclusion comments (single-, multiline) from queries before execution. Comments don't need to execute query and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @felixcheung example in jira --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 @anthonycorbacho thanks for the feedback, addressed them above. Let me know if there's something else and if it works fine for you. Also would be nice if other members could

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2166: [ZEPPELIN-2288] Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2166 Thank you for the contribution. LGTM! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 could you elaborate on what errors would come from comment in SQL? generally we should avoid trying to pre-parse the paragraph text since we don't necessarily know the SQL dialect the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1934: [ZEPPELIN-2001] Publish Apache Zeppelin artifac...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1934 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2139: ZEPPELIN-2261. Support to connect with livy through ht...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2139 I am afraid not, ssh need keystore file which is host dependent. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Strongly +1 for adding system test for different interpreter modes and focus on bug fixing than new features. I do heard from some users complain about the bugs of zeppelin major release. A stabilized release is very necessary for community. Best Regard, Jeff Zhang From: moon soo Lee

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 I fixed Jenkins build command the problem taking wrong commit hash when it's got merge commit. Now Jenkins will take correct commits. @tinkoff-dwh Could you try close / re-open this PR and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test Jenkins build script test with organization repository. Won't be merged. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test Jenkins build script test with organization repository. Won't be merged. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 I made a mistake. And updated the jenkins command again. @andreaTP Could you close/reopen once more? :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test Jenkins build script test with organization repository. Won't be merged. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user andreaTP commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 Done, let see the result! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm r...

Github user andreaTP closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm r...

GitHub user andreaTP reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry ### What is this PR for? When deploying Zeppelin in private Cloud or within closed networks, it happens that Npm Registry isn't

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 I updated Jenkins build command. @andreaTP can you close / reopen this PR? Jenkins now will check https://travis-ci.org/nokia/zeppelin/builds/213131116 correctly. --- If your project is set

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompletene...

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompletene...

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompleteness of data ### What is this PR for? Added notification about exceeding the limit in the result. ### What type of PR is it?

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with replaced context parameters ### What is this PR for? Adds posibility to use context parameters (types: String.class, Double.class,

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2169: [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2169 [CI-TEST] Jenkins build script test Jenkins build script test with organization repository. Won't be merged. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 Looks like Jenkins build script still does not handle contribution from organization repository very well. Let me try fix this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Great to see discussion for 0.8.0. List of features for 0.8.0 looks really good. *Interpreter factory refactoring* Interpreter layer supports various behavior depends on combination of PerNote,PerUser / Shared,Scoped,Isolated. We'll need strong test cases for each combination as a first step.

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with replaced context parameters ### What is this PR for? Adds posibility to use context parameters (types: String.class, Double.class,

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2085: [ZEPPELIN-1999] get interpreter property with r...

Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user andreaTP commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 no luck again :-( --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm r...

Github user andreaTP closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user andreaTP commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 @Leemoonsoo rebased. Unfortunately again failures on CI, this is on Jenkins side I guess https://builds.apache.org/job/zeppelin-pull-request/580/console this is spurious since travis

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm r...

GitHub user andreaTP reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry ### What is this PR for? When deploying Zeppelin in private Cloud or within closed networks, it happens that Npm Registry isn't

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @Leemoonsoo fix it. CI green, https://travis-ci.org/tinkoff-dwh/zeppelin/builds/213118918 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2167: [ZEPPELIN-2230] .travis.yml protecting against ambiguo...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2167 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @Leemoonsoo i rebase from master. because if merge then CI red (jenking ignore merge commits). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 Looks like somehow this branch includes commits not part of this contribution.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 /cc @anthonycorbacho @Leemoonsoo @AhyoungRyu plz help to review and test this one --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @Leemoonsoo done --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompleteness of d...

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 CI green https://travis-ci.org/tinkoff-dwh/zeppelin/builds/213063178 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2168: [ZEPPELIN-1889] [FIX] Multiple groups in chart ...

GitHub user sravan-s opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2168 [ZEPPELIN-1889] [FIX] Multiple groups in chart doesn't work ### What is this PR for? Fix for multiple group in multi-bar chart If any value is missing under any domain key in

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped ...

Github user sravan-s closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2130: ZEPPELIN-2251. Support getProgress for livy interprete...

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2130 merging if no more comment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped ...

Github user sravan-s closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped ...

GitHub user sravan-s reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped data ### What is this PR for? Fix for multiple group in multi-bar chart If any value is missing under any domain key in stacked

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2139: ZEPPELIN-2261. Support to connect with livy through ht...

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2139 is it possible to add tests for https? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped ...

GitHub user sravan-s reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped data ### What is this PR for? Fix for multiple group in multi-bar chart If any value is missing under any domain key in stacked

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped ...

Github user sravan-s closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped data

Github user sravan-s commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 Sorry, it's my mistake, I did a pull instead of rebase --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2099: [ZEPPELIN-2106] providing paragraph config in create n...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2099 @Remilito Thanks for great work! LGTM and merge to master if no further discussions. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 yes, i think my fork was integrated with travis since i have the build here https://travis-ci.org/khalidhuseynov/incubator-zeppelin/builds/212981024 . also the branch was rebased today and

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2160: [ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped data

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160 I checked Jenkins log for last commit 368a50e. And looks like Jenkins build script somehow confused with 'merge' and handling it not very well. :-( --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 Current jenkins script check only https://travis-ci.org/khalidhuseynov/zeppelin/ not https://travis-ci.org/khalidhuseynov/incubator-zeppelin/. Could you setup travis with 'zeppelin'

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2166: [ZEPPELIN-2288] Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check

Github user elek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2166 Branch is rebased to apache/master and travis is enabled. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2158: [ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 @tinkoff-dwh Thanks for contribution. CI failure on exceeding timelimit has fixed on master branch. Can you try rebase this branch and see if CI becomes green? --- If your project is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2133: [ZEPPELIN-1357][Umbrella] Text overlap in the MultiBar...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2133 @soralee can you rebase or merge master and see if ci becomes green? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 @andreaTP Problem on CI just has fixed on master branch. Could you try rebase or merge master branch and see if CI passes? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for second...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 Can you setup [CI](http://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration) for you fork? And then you'll need rebase this branch to include some fixes for

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2163: [ZEPPELIN-2287] Add more test to ensure 'RunOnSelectio...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2163 CI problem has fixed on master branch. Can you rebase and see if this PR passes the tests? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2166: [ZEPPELIN-2288] Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2166 Tested and it works well. Could you setup travis-ci for your fork and see if it passes the test? Please take a look

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2162: [HOTFIX] [ZEPPELIN-2286] Fix CI and split some ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2162: [HOTFIX] [ZEPPELIN-2286] Fix CI and split some test ma...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162 I rebased to current master and CI becomes green! Merge this PR to master and branch-0.7 as a hotfix while it significantly reduce chance of failing 2nd and 3rd test matrix by timeout.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2162: [HOTFIX] [ZEPPELIN-2286] Fix CI and split some test ma...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162 @sravan-s Test failure `NotebookTest.testAngularObjectRemovalOnInterpreterRestart:699` is already addressed in the commit

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for...

Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

There are several pending visualization improvements/PRs that would be very good to get them in as well. From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM To: dev; us...@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Roadmap for 0.8.0 Hi dev &

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2164: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when option is...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2164 Tested and LGTM. It fixes test failure on SELENIUM test matrix. Merge to master as an hotfix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2164: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when op...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2164 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2161: [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for...

GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161 [ZEPPELIN-1697] Fix multiuser ws connection for secondary ZeppelinHubRepo storage ### What is this PR for? This is to fix problem with ws connection that was introduced in 0.7.0

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2111: [ZEPPELIN-2230] clear bower_contents if bower.json cha...

Github user Remilito commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2111 @jongyoul : https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2167 should help --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2099: [ZEPPELIN-2106] providing paragraph config in create n...

Github user Remilito commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2099 @Leemoonsoo : updated! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2166: [ZEPPELIN-2288] Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check

GitHub user elek opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2166 [ZEPPELIN-2288] Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check Change-Id: Iad87ebe0b5dd6bd67a12e47fe83fbd0e1e71bda9 ### What is this PR for? ZEPPELIN-173 implemented an optional check for the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2167: [ZEPPELIN-2230] .travis.yml protecting against ...

GitHub user Remilito opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2167 [ZEPPELIN-2230] .travis.yml protecting against ambiguous commit range ### What is this PR for? Following the revert of [](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2111 ) I added some

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2288) Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check

Elek, Marton created ZEPPELIN-2288: -- Summary: Fix Cross-Site WebSocket check Key: ZEPPELIN-2288 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2288 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2145: [ZEPPELIN-2271] encoding password of credentials

Github user dwhsys commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2145 @felixcheung @jongyoul , I want to discuss the problem of "false sense of security". I hope that anyone who want to use "credentials feature" in enterprise solution will be aware of low

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2141: [ZEPPELIN-1720] Adding tests to verify behaviour of dy...

Github user guicaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141 Selenium tests are red in Travis but due to: `SparkParagraphIT.testSqlSpark:185 » NoSuchElement Unable to locate element: {"... `

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2162: [HOTFIX] [ZEPPELIN-2286] Fix CI and split some test ma...

Github user sravan-s commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162 Hi, Recently, I have been facing two issues in the CI First one is CI getting timed out, which is getting addressed here The other one is: `

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2141: [ZEPPELIN-1720] Adding tests to verify behaviour of dy...

Github user guicaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141 @AhyoungRyu Fixed the issue with my commits, big shoutout to @DrIgor for helping resolve my issue! I also updated the tests (ex. `testSingleDynamicFormSelectForm`,

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2134: [ZEPPELIN-2257] notification about incompleteness of d...

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2134 

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Yeah, make sense. Jongyoul Lee 于2017年3月20日周一 下午7:21写道： > Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop. > Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but > we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2098: [ZEPPELIN-2217][WIP] AdvancedTransformation for Visual...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2098 Few things are left. Thus i'v just changed to WIP again. Sorry for confusing. - adding more `transformation.method` for columnar and drill-down charts: `array:key`, `array:group`,

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop. Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all issues and make some groups and handle it. How do you think? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2165: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when op...

Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2165 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2165: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when option is...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2165 Will merge it --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2165: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when op...

GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2165 [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when option is shared globally ### What is this PR for? Avoid closing interpreter in shared mode ### What type of PR is it? [Hot

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2164: [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when op...

GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2164 [HOTFIX] Disabled to close interpreters when option is shared globally ### What is this PR for? Avoid closing interpreter in shared mode ### What type of PR is it? [Hot

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2104: ZEPPELIN-2224. Throw more meaningful exception when ke...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2104 ping @felixcheung --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry

Github user andreaTP commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 probably you have a problem on Jenkins, Travis is currently building without errors: https://travis-ci.org/nokia/zeppelin still this PR is marked as Failed... --- If your project

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2150: [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm r...

GitHub user andreaTP reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150 [ZEPPELIN-2278] Env variable to configure Npm registry ### What is this PR for? When deploying Zeppelin in private Cloud or within closed networks, it happens that Npm Registry isn't

  1   2   >