Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2852
> Git tag regularly is not something feels right [ Usually in practice Git
Tag are to be done only once ].
That is my understanding of the snapshot scenario. Snapshot is only
readable,
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
Took a look changes and it looks good to me
---
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2803
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
@Leemoonsoo @jongyoul @prabhjyotsingh @felixcheung Could you help review it
? Thanks, it is for 0.9.
---
Github user rockiee281 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2870
Sorry, I'm not familiar with git rebase ,create PR #2884 instead
---
GitHub user rockiee281 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2884
trim property name of interpreter settings
### What is this PR for?
trim property name of interpreter settings
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
### Todos
*
Github user Tagar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2834
@zjffdu, @felixcheung would be exciting to have this feature be part of the
0.8.0 release.
Since there is a way to maintain backward compatibility, it seems to be a
low hanging fruit
as
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2880
I think we should try to fix the build profile as in this PR.
But we must fix the download source - otherwise given what Iâve seen
recently, we cannot release (its not up to me)
Github user SleepyThread commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2852
@zjffdu Implementation using Git Tag is also another approach but
updating/delete Git tag regularly is not something feels right [ Usually in
practice Git Tag are to be done only once ].
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2883
ZEPPELIN-3355. Support inline configuration for user session
### What is this PR for?
Generic ConfInterpreter only support process level configuration, this PR
is trying to introduce
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2870
@rockiee281 seems you didn't do rebase correctly , or you can create
another PR
---
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-3355:
Summary: Support inline configuration for user session
Key: ZEPPELIN-3355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3355
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2881
@zjffdu currently data update and refresh timing in ui grid is not
guaranteed. This issue persists only when the interval is below 1sec. I
modified your example with 2sec delay and the rendering
GitHub user mebelousov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2876
ZEPPELIN-3344. Revert comments in queries in JDBC interpreter
### What is this PR for?
The original purpose of https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158 was
correct processing of
Github user mebelousov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2876
---
Github user mebelousov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2716
@woowahan-jaehoon thank you!
Perhaps #2780 will delete all unused pid files and you can add the port to
the pid filename.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2882
---
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2882
ZEPPELIN-3290. Unnecessary message 'IPython is available, use IPython for
PySparkInterpreter'
### What is this PR for?
Trivial PR for removing the unnecessary message
###
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-3354:
Summary: Change pull mode to push mode for the communication
between ZeppelinServer to Interpreter Process
Key: ZEPPELIN-3354
URL:
19 matches
Mail list logo