[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1012: ZEPPELIN-999 Support alias for JDBC properties

2016-06-15 Thread jongyoul
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012 I also made a PR as a generalized version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1012 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on Git

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1012: ZEPPELIN-999 Support alias for JDBC properties

2016-06-15 Thread jongyoul
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012 @bzz I'll merge it into master and branch-0.6 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1012: ZEPPELIN-999 Support alias for JDBC properties

2016-06-14 Thread bzz
Github user bzz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012 Thank you @jongyoul, 👍 for having tests! Improving this further by generalizing to other interpreters after a release sounds like a very good plan. Looks great to me. --- If your pro

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1012: ZEPPELIN-999 Support alias for JDBC properties

2016-06-14 Thread jongyoul
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012 @felixcheung I also have a plan to generalize this feature after 0.6.0 releases. :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as wel

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1012: ZEPPELIN-999 Support alias for JDBC properties

2016-06-14 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012 Nice! Can this be generalized to not just jdbc? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th