Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread moon soo Lee
Hi Jongyoul, Try build again after this, rm -rf zeppelin-web/bower_components/ Best, moon On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jongyoul Lee wrote: > Hi, Moon, > > I've tried to compile code on that branch. It, However, occurs error like: > > [INFO] bower angular#~1.x ca

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Jongyoul Lee
Hi, Moon, I've tried to compile code on that branch. It, However, occurs error like: [INFO] bower angular#~1.x cached git:// github.com/angular/bower-angular.git#1.3.10 [INFO] bower angular#~1.x validate 1.3.10 against git://github.com/angular/bow

Re: ApacheCon 2014 Zeppelin talk proposal submission

2015-01-20 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Btw, any of you guys plan to be at FOSDEM in two weeks? Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Good idea! > > Be aware that CFP is closing in about two weeks. > > Cos > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:03PM, Alex B. wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> what do you think if

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread moon soo Lee
Hi Jongyoul, I just pushed an branch for Spark 1.2 https://github.com/NFLabs/zeppelin/pull/294 This is still in development and not fully tested, but as you can see the screenshots, the default functions are working. If you're interested, please test this branch and give some feedback. Hope this

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Alex B
There are couple of problems with Spark 1.2 support, some of them will be solved by recent Spark 1.2.1 release soon (unpublished artifacts) and others (classloading issues) hopefully with remote process interpreter I'm working on right now. Mesos might be an option, although I do not have much exp

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Kevin (Sangwoo) Kim
I guess supporting Spark 1.2 is one of the most important issue today and probably will be resolved soon, Until then, you might try Zeppelin in local mode with local data for try and learn! Maybe @moon will comment more for Spark 1.2 support. And I'm running standalone spark cluster and have no

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Jongyoul Lee
Hi Kevin, Thanks for quick reply. I've checked maven central and figured it out as a spark issue. Unfortunately, I have 1.2.0 cluster only. And have you tested zeppelin on a mesos cluster? Thanks, Jongyoul On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Kevin (Sangwoo) Kim wrote: > Hi Jongyoul, > Great to s

Re: Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Kevin (Sangwoo) Kim
Hi Jongyoul, Great to see you in mailing list! Sadly, for now Zeppelin not work with Spark 1.2. https://github.com/NFLabs/zeppelin/issues/260 Please try with Spark 1.1.1 version. Regards, Kevin (Sangwoo) On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 10:46:35 AM Jongyoul Lee wrote: > Hi dev, > > I'm new to use Zeppel

Maven build fails

2015-01-20 Thread Jongyoul Lee
Hi dev, I'm new to use Zeppelin. I've failed while building from source. The following is error messages. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project zeppelin-spark: Could not resolve dependencies for project com.nflabs.zeppelin:zeppelin-spark:jar:0.4.0: Failure to find org.apache.spark:spark-repl_

Re: Project GH issue-tracker transition to ASF JIRA

2015-01-20 Thread Alex B.
Current plan on Subj is to do it as a last step of whole migration process: right after source code is moved to ASF Git and Github mirror is created. FYI: sign-up is disabled now on old project JIRA https://zeppelin-project.atlassian.net and as soon as issues are migrated I think we will add a not

Re: Codebase transition from GH to ASF git repo

2015-01-20 Thread Henry Saputra
If all contributions to Zeppelin legally belongs to NFLabs I think we could just attach the full history donation. - Henry On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Alex wrote: > I have a question to contributors: do we want full Git history to be donated > to ASF and migrated to ASF git or only the lat

Re: Codebase transition from GH to ASF git repo

2015-01-20 Thread Alex
I have a question to contributors: do we want full Git history to be donated to ASF and migrated to ASF git or only the latest state would be enough I.e HEAD of the master? Therefor another question is to mentors: in case of full history donation, would it be enough to just mention full history