Hi Moon
Here is what I get with zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all:
res0: String =
/Users/tog/Downloads/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all/interpreter/spark/pyspark/pyspark.zip:/Users/tog/Downloads/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all/interpreter/spark/pyspark/py4j-0.8.2.1-src.zip
this looks fine
Che
yes, PYTHONPATH looks fine. If your filesystem has
/Users/tog/Downloads/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all/interpreter/spark/pyspark/pyspark.zip
/Users/tog/Downloads/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all/interpreter/spark/pyspark/py4j-0.8.2.1-src.zip
then, it supposed to work without py4j installed in
+1 for restarting vote with rc3
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:04 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> following issues are found during rc2 verification.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-404
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-405
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/376#issuecomment-154801136
Too bad it doesn't work on Firefox and Safari
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/399#issuecomment-154801166
Works Great, let's merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/405#issuecomment-154802680
Thanks for the document update. CI failing is irrelevant.
Looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user minahlee commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/405#issuecomment-154803651
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Yes I am puzzled - I removed py4j and it worked.
My OS is 10.11.1 (El Capitan)
Will try on a fresh Ubuntu VM and let you know.
Cheers
Guillaume
On 8 November 2015 at 10:10, moon soo Lee wrote:
> yes, PYTHONPATH looks fine. If your filesystem has
>
>
> /Users/tog/Downloads/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubat
Mina Lee created ZEPPELIN-407:
-
Summary: Improv
Key: ZEPPELIN-407
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-407
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Mina Lee
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/400#issuecomment-154806312
Awesome, makes everything smoother.
One bug I found though, Is that the cursor cannot move to a paragraph where
the output is hidden.
---
If you
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/408
ZEPPELIN-372 : fix for not working on Firefox and Safari
With reference to bug in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/376#issuecomment-154801136
have made a fix,
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/376#issuecomment-154810277
@corneadoug thank you for finding this issue, have made another pr
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/408 with the fix.
---
If your pr
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/400#issuecomment-154814370
@corneadoug Thanks for testing. pushed a commit to address the bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
OK - tried again on abrand new Ubuntu VM ... and it worked like a charm
Sorry must have been confused between my dev repo and the rc2 deployment
Cheers
Guillaume
On 8 November 2015 at 10:55, tog wrote:
> Yes I am puzzled - I removed py4j and it worked.
> My OS is 10.11.1 (El Capitan)
> Will tr
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/395#issuecomment-154818576
Looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
No problem. Really appreciate for verifying RC.
Thanks,
moon
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 9:09 PM tog wrote:
> OK - tried again on abrand new Ubuntu VM ... and it worked like a charm
> Sorry must have been confused between my dev repo and the rc2 deployment
>
> Cheers
> Guillaume
>
> On 8 November 2
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/407#issuecomment-154826136
Ready to merge. This PR addresses license of files in /docs (website src)
directory.
Please review and comment here if there're any other license relat
I'm going to cancel this vote and restart with rc3, after ZEPPELIN-404,
ZEPPELIN-405, ZEPPELIN-406 resolved.
Thanks for everyone who verified this release candidate.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 7:23 PM Mina Lee wrote:
> +1 for restarting vote with rc3
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:04 PM, moon soo Lee
Canceling this vote while,
1. 3rd party repos are included - ZEPPELIN-404
2. Build instruction does not specify set -Ppyspark to make pyspark work
out of box - ZEPPELIN-405
3. License are unhandled files under /docs - ZEPPELIN-406
Vote will be restarted with rc3 after ZEPPELIN-404, ZEPPELIN-405,
GitHub user craigching opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/409
Allow the spark app name to be configurable
Allows spark.app.name to be configurable. This is useful when you have
multiple zeppelin instances connected to the same spark cluster. I
Getting ready to convert my blog tutorial to mark down to incorporate on
site.
Options for placement are:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/tree/master/docs/docs/install/
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/tree/master/docs/docs/tutorial/
If anyone has a preference please let
Chiwan Park created ZEPPELIN-408:
Summary: Configuration of directories cannot be set by XML
Key: ZEPPELIN-408
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-408
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/404#issuecomment-154866069
looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/407#issuecomment-154868436
looks good. it's a bit odd to have a html license header on the json
content - should we just put the json sample on the API doc page instead of
separate
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/407#issuecomment-154893887
Tested and looks good to me.
The only thing though (not sure if that is relevant) is that somehow a
downloads page for me is missing the content of the #
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/404#issuecomment-154894521
looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/404
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Hi,
All pom.xml under Branch-0.5.5 were changed version to 0.5.6, which is weird.
branch name is 0.5.5, but the actually version is 0.5.6.
A common proper way is create a new branch for 0.5.6 based on the 0.5.5, then
changed the version to 0.5.6 on the new branch.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:12AM, Fengdong Yu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> All pom.xml under Branch-0.5.5 were changed version to 0.5.6, which is
> weird. branch name is 0.5.5, but the actually version is 0.5.6.
>
> A common proper way is create a new branch for 0.5.6 based on the 0.5.5,
> then changed th
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/400#issuecomment-154904028
Good For Merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user tejasapatil closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/371
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user tejasapatil closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/370
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Hi, all developers:
I’m confused with kinds of Interpreters.
Can you explain the relationship between
RemoteInterpreter、LazyOpenInterpreter and other specified interpreters like
SparkInterpreter or SparkSqlInterpreter ?
Is RemoteInterpreter the wrapper of specified interpreters?
It was intended to branch-0.5 take care all 0.5.x release with tag.
Only reason branch-0.5.5 is created for 0.5.5 instead of using branch-0.5
since we decided to release 0.5.5 from master after it diverged a lot.
So, I expect from 0.6.x we use single branch, branch-0.6 for all 0.6.x
release with t
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/407#issuecomment-154919540
@felixcheung
Thanks for review. I think that make sense.
@bzz
#387 is merged into master branch only. And it was for 0.5.0 release, not
Yes, that make sense. we should keep the branch pom version never changed
after released.
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:31 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
>
> It was intended to branch-0.5 take care all 0.5.x release with tag.
> Only reason branch-0.5.5 is created for 0.5.5 instead of using branch-0.5
> s
One branch take care only one release. then create a new branch for next
release.
Don’t make branch-0.5 to take care 0.5.x release. that’s not make sense.
because if I want to get 0.5.3 source code after 0.5.5 released. It’s very
trouble to get it.
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:31 PM, moon soo
That's what the tag is for
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Fengdong Yu
wrote:
> One branch take care only one release. then create a new branch for next
> release.
>
> Don’t make branch-0.5 to take care 0.5.x release. that’s not make sense.
>
> because if I want to get 0.5.3 source code after
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/408#issuecomment-154930641
Tested.
* Firefox good
* Safari download a file with name _Unknow_ but seems we can't do anything
about it.
Any chance to also have a IE v
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/357#issuecomment-154942793
Dose this looks ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/357#issuecomment-154953321
@prabhjyotsingh I will take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
+1
On 05/11/15 8:32 pm, Mina Lee wrote:
+1
2015. 11. 6. 오전 12:01에 "moon soo Lee" 님이 작성:
Hi folks,
I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin
(incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
The commit id is 72e38d0b3c3ba8b08ba1176c2eb2c38661a54d31 :
https://git-wip-us.apache.o
Hi,
I added :
export JAVA_OPTS=“-Xmx 2g -Xmn1g” in zeppelin-env.sh, then Zeppelin daemon
cannot start, why is this?
Thanks
43 matches
Mail list logo
