Ahyoung created ZEPPELIN-490:
Summary: Tidying up dynamicform.md to distinguish each category
easily
Key: ZEPPELIN-490
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-490
Project: Zeppelin
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/463#issuecomment-162438675
@elbamos Nowadays most of people use Zeppelin with their own or external
spark but basically, Zeppelin doesn't need to them. This is for those who use
Zeppe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/496
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/515#issuecomment-162435590
@corneadoug Thanks for the quick reply. :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/515#issuecomment-162435492
@jongyoul Yeah, I'm already reviewing most of the front PR right now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/515#issuecomment-162434330
It looks good to me but I'm not a expert of this area. @corneadoug could
you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/510#issuecomment-162431074
Yes, it does, closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/512#issuecomment-162431020
I just checked that PR, a few comments:
* When we have a new paragraph title **untitled**, the value is not inside
the input on edit.
* When the in
Github user prabhjyotsingh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/510
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/510#issuecomment-162424232
If I'm right, #512 is solving the same issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/506#issuecomment-162422764
Merging if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloverhearts commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/496#issuecomment-162422545
Thank you for all your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Madhav A created ZEPPELIN-489:
-
Summary: Getting a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space in
maven build
Key: ZEPPELIN-489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-489
Project: Zeppelin
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/497#issuecomment-162422001
Thank all participants for kind reviews!
@Leemoonsoo could you check 468a858 and let me know if you think that is
enough?
---
If your project is set up
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:03AM, Corneau Damien wrote:
> Thanks Cos for those answers,
>
> If I'm right you are advising to have a default build that doesn't include
> libraries with conflicting licenses, but have an option to include them for
> users who wants to build the project themselves.
Ye
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/510#issuecomment-162420980
Ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/517
ZEPPELIN-487 Change supporting multiple statements to multiple connections
Changed multiple statements to multiple connection. Some JDBC don't support
parallel executions with one con
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/515#issuecomment-162420846
Ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/504#issuecomment-162420471
Can we merge this, if there is discussion around this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
getting this error when I run the maven build. Any ideas where I can set
the JVM settings?
apache-maven-3.3.9/conf/logging/
---
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
at
java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList.itera
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/470#issuecomment-162415154
I tried using this option:
```
client: {
captureConsole: false
},
```
But it doesn't change anything
---
If your project is set
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/302
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/302#issuecomment-162395713
Close this PR because of not using anymore
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/484#issuecomment-162395405
Merging if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/497#issuecomment-162388927
@Leemoonsoo thank you for kind reminder! Will do it and ping back
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Sure, that's perfect place we can test drive.
Thanks,
moon
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:46 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:56 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> > Apologies about being upset in this thread with non-technical issue.
> >
> >
> > How about we start from adding such thi
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/507#issuecomment-162386616
Merging if there's no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/517#issuecomment-162368296
It's soft of defensive code for avoiding error. Do you think it's
redundant? I'll fix this code more general :-). Thanks for the review quickly.
---
If yo
Github user prasadwagle commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/517#issuecomment-162349965
I tested the pull request and it allowed Vertica queries to execute in
parallel with one modification. Thanks!
I had to comment:
//if (st
Github user elbamos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/463#issuecomment-162334278
Wasn't the whole purpose of the spark-dependencies module, so the
dependencies could be managed for new Spark releases without these kinds of
issues?
---
I
Github user elbamos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/463#issuecomment-162332053
Guys - I don't want to be the downer here, but:
* This PR changes what looks like hundreds of lines of the dependency
structure in the build files.
*
Sebastian YEPES FERNANDEZ created ZEPPELIN-488:
--
Summary: ZeppelinServer Only showing the war directory structure
Key: ZEPPELIN-488
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-488
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/484#issuecomment-162319870
Nice description. LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/60#issuecomment-162319547
@1teed Hi, do you still have an interest to contribute this feature? I've
found that your PR is the first one for supporting JDBC thus I think it's
important
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/496#issuecomment-162318725
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/517
ZEPPELIN-487 Change supporting multiple statements to multiple connections
Changed multiple statements to multiple connection. Some JDBC don't support
parallel executions with one conne
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/463#issuecomment-162302720
@felixcheung How's it going? Feel free to talk, I'm willing to help you to
resolve this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-487:
-
Summary: Change supporting multiple statements to multiple
connections
Key: ZEPPELIN-487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-487
Project: Zeppelin
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/499
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
40 matches
Mail list logo
