Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/782#issuecomment-201719098
ResourcePool supposed to allow any resource. From not serializable object
such as SparkContext, to very large object. `Object r` field in `class
Resource`
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/789#issuecomment-201716379
Thanks @echarles for the review. Having separate ui for env variables can
be a future improvement, but i also think having env and java properties mixed
i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/792
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/791
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/788
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Hi,
Andreas, great to have you on board. I have added you to project wiki [1].
You proposal looks good, thank you for putting together links to a diverse
set of potential datasets
1.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Google+Summer+Of+Code+2016
--
Alex
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at
Hi Aurélien Hébert,
Currently, Each InterpreterGroup has a AngularObjectRegistry [1].
InterpreterGroup is list of interpreter instances in the same group.
For example instance of SparkInterpreter and SparkSqlInterpreter will be in
the same InterpreterGroup object, but ShellInterpreter will not.
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201649645
I ran tests on my machine my test stopped
```
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.267 sec -
in org.apache.zeppe
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201622291
I think 'isolated', 'dedicated' can be applied to both 'instance' and
'process'. isn't it?
Here is what i was intended
'shared' : single
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/742#issuecomment-201618592
@doanduyhai Great. LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/783
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user doanduyhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/742#issuecomment-201580195
@Leemoonsoo Done, I have added `ZeppelinIT.testAngularRunParagraph()`. The
PR can be merged if no more remark/question
---
If your project is set up for
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201539303
and what does "instance" mean?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user EronWright commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201532523
@Leemoonsoo leaving the default as-is sounds fine. I agree with @echarles
that the terminology of 'process' confusing. "Isolated" or "dedicated" maybe.
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201485432
Failed at:
Zeppelin: Server and Display system apis this time? Run it again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user rawkintrevo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
GitHub user rawkintrevo reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794
[ZEPPELIN-760] Companion object bug fix for Flink Interpretter
### What is this PR for?
This implements the solution presented for the Spark interpreter in PR-780
for the Flink
Hi Alexander,
I've already sumitted my final proposal to google. Thanks for all the good
advice and suggestions.
Hopefully looking forward to help with this project through GSoC.
Best regards,
Paul
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:22 AM Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> sounds great, please do
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201441447
That seems flaky test. Could you re-trigger CI once? close-open pullrequest
or adding a commit will trigger CI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201433744
3622.1 Failed on
assertTrue(result.message().contains(sizeVal + ": Int = " +
ignite.cluster().nodes().size()));
Which I didn't touch (?)
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/797#issuecomment-201420701
could you share a before/after screenshot
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Could it in cluster mode have access to breeze.linalg?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:34 AM -0700, "Trevor Grant"
wrote:
The following code works as expected in 'local' mode (Flink):
import breeze.linalg.{DenseVector => BreezeDenseVector}
import org.apache.flink.ml.common.LabeledVector
im
The following code works as expected in 'local' mode (Flink):
import breeze.linalg.{DenseVector => BreezeDenseVector}
import org.apache.flink.ml.common.LabeledVector
import org.apache.flink.ml.math.Vector
import org.apache.flink.ml.regression.MultipleLinearRegression
val features = 5
val N = 10
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/793
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201319759
Please take a look line number around 12036 of job 3610.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hi everyone!
I am Andreas and I am glad that I joined Zeppelin's Devs! I want to offer
as much as possible to the Zeppelin project, starting from the Google
Summer of Code.
Please find my draft proposal here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18m_QGg0tOsn0JyLFRV6fv0DXwovup9rWkCAdd0xZdW4/edit?usp
Hello,
I am currently building an interpreter Zeppelin to request our own
data-storage platform. I would like to store some variable and then use
them with Spark.
I implemented a way to store them in the angular registry. When I request
them on zeppelin inside my own interpreter the registry cont
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201269846
I was getting test errors earlier because I copy/pasted to fast and didn't
change the name of the interpreter context variable as I went (or changed it to
Aurelien Hebert created ZEPPELIN-762:
Summary: Add a methods to get Angular object from pySpark
Key: ZEPPELIN-762
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-762
Project: Zeppelin
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796#issuecomment-201212072
@johnnyws thank you for stepping up and bringing this back to life.
CI is failing on web application build, so may be you should check what
`./grunt jsh
Github user echarles commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/789#issuecomment-201174476
Thx, Makes sense.
The rolls would be to have separated ui for env variables, but having env
and java properties mixed in the interpreter settings is good
31 matches
Mail list logo
