Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

//www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair >> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc >> [3] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newchair >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> >> > This looks good to me.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

tp://incubator.apache.org/projects/zeppelin.html#Project+info > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:23 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >> > Hi Moon, >> > >> > Actually we should

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Moon, > > Actually we should add proposed board resolution [1] in the Vote thread > which include choosing the chair. > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel That's a really good advice! Part of the graduation p

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Amos Elberg wrote: > The one that is a graduation issue, concerns the diversity of the PMC, and > whether graduation is being rushed. The project still is largely centered > around one individual and company. FWIW: the diversity requirements around company affili

Re: Concerns about PR208 was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

Amos, Moon, Felix, I would like to call a time out on this and the other thread. All of you had a chance to state your position and I don't think we're going to approach the resolution any quicker if you keep sending heated emails to the public mailing list. Now, this is NOT an attempt to sweep t

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

In general I agree. That said, if one of you guys were to fill out the Apache Maturity Model checklist that would help frame the IPMC discussion. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Mina Lee wrote: > I think Zeppelin meets the requirements for graduation. > > Zeppelin community is gr

Fwd: Hadoop Summit in San Jose – Call for Abstracts is Now Open!

Time to get those submissions in! Also, may be a good idea to keep track of the submissions on the wiki so that the community members can follow up with voting for the ones they like without digging through tons of submissions. Thanks, Roman. -- Forwarded message -- From: Hadoop

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

ons. > > So, if you guys have any other concerns and expectations about R > Interpreter or contribution in general, please share them so they can be > addressed, too. > > Thanks, > moon > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:51 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

Like I said -- I would strongly recommend sorting out the issue with Amos ahead of committing to graduation vote. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:07 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > If everything is okay, shall we start community vote? > > fyi, graduation process, > http://incubator.apache.org/

Re: contributions impasse. Was: [GitHub] incubator-zeppelin pull request: R Interpreter for Zeppelin

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:56 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Apologies about being upset in this thread with non-technical issue. > > > How about we start from adding such things like > > - Ping the other committer when no response from committer > - Keep codebase change small if possible (or break cont

Re: contributions impasse. Was: [GitHub] incubator-zeppelin pull request: R Interpreter for Zeppelin

Hi! On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi Cos, > > Thanks for opening a discussion. > My answer about 'Why this PR is open for three months' is > > 1. This PR does not passes CI > 2. Not 100% sure this PR has no license issue. (about KniteR) > 3. Need more time to review. Af

Re: contributions impasse. Was: [GitHub] incubator-zeppelin pull request: R Interpreter for Zeppelin

Hi! reading through the thread made me realize that what Amos is saying makes perfect sense to me. That said, I don't like to take Moon's concerns lightly either. Hence, would it be possible to get the *bundle* of a binary package built with the patch applied and ready to go? I'd like to provide

FOSDEM 2016 - take action by 4th of December 2015

As most of you probably know FOSDEM 2016 (the biggest, 100% free open source developer conference) is right around the corner: https://fosdem.org/2016/ We hope to have an ASF booth and we would love to see as many ASF projects as possible present at various tracks (AKA Developer rooms): htt

Fwd: Time to propose a CS Capstone Project!

FYI. If anybody would want to drive this (personally I'm way out of cycles to commit to that) I think it could be a good way to spur some potential community growth. Thanks, Roman. -- Forwarded message -- From: Steven Hathaway Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:17 PM Subject: Fwd: Tim

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap and first release

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Hey Moon, mentors and fellow PPMCs, > > as soon as we all agree that the roadmap on the wiki looks awesome, shall > we 'itemize' it now in the JIRA issues? (and assign to planned versions) > Later sub-task can be added as needed. I don'

Re: [DISCUSS] incubator repot draft Jun2015

t;> >> Integration to Apache Flink, Apache Ignite, Apache Lens, Apache Hbase, >> Prestodb are started and work in progress. Community had discussions about >> managing branch and managing interpreter submodules. >> >> Date of last release: >> >> None >> >> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >> >> 2015-03-27 >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:58 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> > The deadline is tonight. >> >

Can someone please provide a June report?

The deadline is tonight.

Re: Ignite on Zeppelin (ZEPPELIN-63)

Hi Moon! as mentor on both projects but more as as just somebody who's really curious to see this happen I'd be really excited to help with prototyping wrt. testing/etc. Please share your work ASAP. I'm so anxious to get my hands on it! Thanks, Roman. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:56 AM, moon soo Le

Re: Discussion about Zeppelin Interpreters maintenance

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >> > I am hearing feedback that Zeppelin is suffering from dependency creep. >&

Re: Discussion about Zeppelin Interpreters maintenance

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I am hearing feedback that Zeppelin is suffering from dependency creep. > The problem is that all of the dependencies for all of the interpreters get > brought in, no matter which interpreters you actually want. > > Leads to problems. Having a

Re: Discussion about Zeppelin Interpreters maintenance

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Roman, James, Jim, Jongyoul, > > thank you guys for a feedback. > > James's point on community growing though the interpreter > contributors\maintainers sounds great indeed and difficulties supporting > external "plugins" with all the ve

Re: Discussion about Zeppelin Interpreters maintenance

With my mentor hat on -- huge +1 to what James said. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:09 AM, James Carman wrote: > Consider the Apache Camel project. There are a *ton* of components > available within Camel and most everything (with compatible license) is > within the Camel project itse

Re: Mentors sign-off on May2015 incubator report

Well, the night is still young ;-) Thanks, Roman. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > sorry for such late reminder, but it looks like Zeppelin does not have > enough signatures on May2015 report > > Need a hand here https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May

Version ID

Hi! it seems that the version ID in your pom.xml is missing -incubating label. Am I missing something? Thanks, Roman.

Re: [DISCUSS] April 2015 Incubator report DRAFT

t; SGA was submitted and acknowledged >> Source code have been migrated to ASF infrastructure (with GH mirror) >> Issues were migrated to ASF JIRA *(in progress now, ETA: before posting >> the report)* >> >> Work on running interpreters in a separate processe

Re: MODERATE for dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org

t; we may need to file INFRA ticket >> > >> > - Henry >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> > > Guys, you need to "subscribe" g...@git.

Fwd: MODERATE for dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org

Guys, you need to "subscribe" g...@git.apache.org to the list in order for these types of messages to go through. I believe Alex is a moderator as well as mentors are. Thanks, Roman. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:03 AM Subject: MODERATE for dev@ze

Re: Project GH issue-tracker transition to ASF JIRA

+Andrew and David (who may know how this is being done recently) On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Updates on Zeppelin GH->ASF JIRA issue tracker migration: > > we are ready to do it now! > > Current plan is to use Robert's > https://github.com/rmetzger/scratch/tree/github2jira >

Re: Docker Images for Zeppelin (as release artifacts)

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:32 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Thanks Roman for information about ASF-wide docker index. > > And, about binary release, >> AFAIK by apache release policy nothing, except the source code, is >> considered to be an 'official release'. > > I think Apache's release policy has s

Re: Docker Images for Zeppelin (as release artifacts)

FYI: ASF is considering what it would take to have ASF-wide docker index presence (and analogy is what we do with github.com). If any of you guys plan to be at ApacheCON -- look up Ross Gardlers's talk and make sure to drop by. Thanks, Roman. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Sub

Any updates on the SGA?

Hi! would be awesome if we can get this sorted out this month. Any chance of that happening? Anything I can help with? Thanks, Roman.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator March 2015 report DRAFT

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Guys > > I realized i missed something on March report. > > One is integration with PredictionIO (published at > http://docs.prediction.io/datacollection/analytics-zeppelin/). > And the other is participating GSoC 2015 ( > https://issues.apach

Re: What's the latest with SGA?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:01 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi Roman, > > I'm working with internal process at NFLabs for signing SGA. > Slowly, but everything goes fine and i expect it can be done in early March. > Thanks for taking care of. Got it! Well, please put as much details into the report on

What's the latest with SGA?

Hi! just wanted to check when do you guys anticipate closing a loop with SGA? Thanks, Roman.

Re: Project website transition to ASF infra (svnpubsub)

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > "How to contribute" [1] does not mention how to change the site code in > SVN [2]. > > Are you expecting some JIRA to welcome contributions? > > The svnpubsub mechanism requires SNV, OK, but the zeppelin incubator > project page [3] mentions

Re: Ideas for GSoC 2015 on Zeppelin project

Great work guys! Quick question though (just for my own edification): is GSoC requires these to be COMDEV JIRAs? Just curious. Thanks, Roman. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Alex B. wrote: > Those are the GSoC 2015 proposals logged in ASF Jira, related to Zeppelin > project: > > - Leverage Zep

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator February 2015 report DRAFT

Looking good! Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Here is a draft of the subj for Zeppelin project. > > Feedback\updates are very welcome. > > > On top, in "Summary of podling reports", sub-section "Still getting started > at the Incubator" I suggest we put notice >

Re: Write access to Zeppelin wiki for initial commiters

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Dear Roman, > > can you please grant subj for > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN ? > > wiki id: bzz Done. In fact, I've just volunteered you to be a second ADMIN for that space. Feel free to help the rest of the team, but use y

Re: Run interpreter in separate process.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Thanks for advice and can not agree more with you guys - as soon as I start > developing a feature of the Zeppelin, simple branching model as you > describe would be my first preference! > > The code that I refer below though does not depend on or

Re: Run interpreter in separate process.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Alex B. wrote: > Quick update: I'v started to hack around a PoC for this feature here > https://github.com/bzz/zeppelin-multiprocess-interpreter-poc , it's very > early stage but please feel free to check it out and provide any feedback. > > On enabling\disabling

Re: ApacheCon 2014 Zeppelin talk proposal submission

Btw, any of you guys plan to be at FOSDEM in two weeks? Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Good idea! > > Be aware that CFP is closing in about two weeks. > > Cos > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:03PM, Alex B. wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> what do you think if

Re: Installing Zeppelin + User List

Btw, this is exactly why Zeppelin packaging via Bigtop would make so much sense -- then installing it would be a simple option of apt-get/yum install. Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Su She wrote: > Hello All, > > Very excited about using Zeppelin! Couple questions: > > 1) Is the

Re: Project GH issue-tracker transition to ASF JIRA

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Alex B. wrote: > Can somebody who have access please help me to add a new JIRA user i.e > "github-import"? > Or advice on the other ways to make it happen. There's a hadoopqa account that virtually every single project in Hadoop ecosystem used to do that sort of

Re: Adding Gradle to Zeppelin

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Same here, enthusiastic +1 for gradle > > After years of mvn I would rather prefer gradle now, although better to > exercise caution here as having a full featured programming language in > build file may make things unnecessary complicated too.

Re: Adding Gradle to Zeppelin

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Anthony Corbacho wrote: > Hi, > > Few month back, I started to work on integrating Gradle to zeppelin (pull > request: pull/171 ) But I > didnt had the time to finish and complete it :( > So the question here is more li

Re: Project website transition to ASF infra (svnpubsub)

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Alex B wrote: >> Great progress! That said, there's a couple of things that >> need to be take care of ASAP (as in -- they go against what >> ASF mandates): >>1. the name of the project should be "Apache Zeppelin (incubating)" > > I'm not sure if this means "re

Re: Project website transition to ASF infra (svnpubsub)

Great progress! That said, there's a couple of things that need to be take care of ASAP (as in -- they go against what ASF mandates): 1. the name of the project should be "Apache Zeppelin (incubating)" 2. "© 2015 The Apache Software Foundation" needs to be removed 3. JIRA link needs to poi

Re: [zeppelin] Spark dependency in maven build file should be set to 'provided' to reduce jar size (#272)

Yup. All *primary* infrastructure MUST be migrated to ASF. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Alex wrote: > Good question! > It was "what is 'official' issue tracker?" > > The "official one" will be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN >

Re: Codebase transition from GH to ASF git repo

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Alex wrote: > Yes, NFLabs is a legal entity incorporated in South Korea, here is CTO on > the list. > And so far we assumed the same - that NFLabs retained copyright on the > entire codebase until now. If NFLabs is within its legal right to control the entire code

Re: Zeppelin Incubator PMC report for January 2015

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex B. wrote: > Guys, > > as today as a due date for Incubator PMC report and Zeppelin has started an > incubation on 2014-12-23 I wanted to rise a question - if Zeppelin is > expected to prepare subj. > But it strikes me that it has been taken care of :) Yes and

Re: Codebase transition from GH to ASF git repo

This could be a complicated (and very important!) subject, but let me try to simplify this conversation a bit: on your project website I see this: "© 2014 NFLabs Inc" Presumably, NFLabs Inc is the legal entity that holds the rights to the entire codebase. If that's the case, is there any chance we

Re: Mailing list transition from Google Groups to Apache

This looks like a great plan to me! Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:20 AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi, All > > We have two mailing list on google groups > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/zeppelin-developers > > and some pages who have reference to it > > https://github.com/NFLabs

Re: How to list all project's committers

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Alex, > > while TLPs have this facility > https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html > > incubation projects do not, AFAIK. At this point all the committers would be > the same as in the initial proposal. Unless someone h