Re: devopsing the gitpack

2019-03-30 Thread Adrian Cole
While no one said this.. I want to express disinterest in intentionally not doing releases, or routinely deferring end users to alternate repositories. I think whatever solution to the "daily build into docker" problem we have should be targeted towards Q/A testers (often the submitters of a pull

Re: devopsing the gitpack

2019-03-30 Thread Sergei Egorov
Hi all, Although Jitpack is great and provides an on-demand Maven repo, it does not build the Docker images. However, one can configure PR builds using Docker Hub's automatic build: https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/builds/ On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 3:39 PM Zoltán Nagy wrote: > Huh. That's sma

Re: devopsing the gitpack

2019-03-30 Thread Zoltán Nagy
Huh. That's smart! A Maven repo that builds artifacts on demand from the version you specify? Cool stuff! I'm unclear on how this would get us closer to Docker images though. Sure we can use JitPack to build the artifacts for us, but we still need to build the Docker image around it somewhere, and

Re: devopsing the gitpack

2019-03-30 Thread Adrian Cole
ps sorry jitpack not gitpack https://jitpack.io/ On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 8:08 PM Adrian Cole wrote: > Hi, folks. > > It might be that I accidentally evoked a way for us to do pull request > docker images or nightlies. Sergei (bsideup) mentioned to me that gitpack > can be an option for these thin

devopsing the gitpack

2019-03-30 Thread Adrian Cole
Hi, folks. It might be that I accidentally evoked a way for us to do pull request docker images or nightlies. Sergei (bsideup) mentioned to me that gitpack can be an option for these things. I dont know if it conflicts or doesnt conflict with the concept of nightlies in ASF, but worth exploring?