Build failed in Jenkins: PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build-maven #1423

See Changes: [randgalt] ZOOKEEPER-1416 [randgalt] ZOOKEEPER-1416 [randgalt] ZOOKEEPER-1416 [randgalt] ZOOKEEPER-1416 -- [...truncated 711.48 K

Build failed in Jenkins: PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build-maven #1424

See Changes: -- [...truncated 711.80 KB...] Generating

Jenkins build is back to normal : PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build-maven #1425

See

Build failed in Jenkins: zookeeper-master-maven-owasp #179

See Changes: -- [...truncated 252.46 KB...] Generating

Build failed in Jenkins: zookeeper-master-maven-owasp #180

See Changes: [andor] ZOOKEEPER-3531: Synchronization on ACLCache cause cluster to hang whe… [andor] ZOOKEEPER-3471: Fix potential lock unavailable due to dangling ephemeral -

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

Checking. Why do we generated SHA512 sums for the gpg signatures? Is that intentional? Andor > On 2019. Oct 8., at 22:36, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.6. > > It fixes 29 issues, including upgrade of third party libraries, > TTL Node APIs for C API, su

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

It's required by the Apache Release process: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution For every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels, the PMC • MUST supply a valid OpenPGP-compatible ASCII-armored detached sig

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

Yeah, we supply SHA512 sum and GPG signature for the tarballs. But I don’t think we need to supply checksum for the GPG signatures too. Here: https://archive.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.5/ Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 17:54, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > > It's required by the Apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

Il mer 9 ott 2019, 17:55 Jordan Zimmerman ha scritto: > It's required by the Apache Release process: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution < > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution> > > For every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels, the > PMC > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

I hope we don’t have to create another RC because of this… Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 18:08, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 17:55 Jordan Zimmerman ha > scritto: > >> It's required by the Apache Release process: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution < >> http:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

Il mer 9 ott 2019, 18:09 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > I hope we don’t have to create another RC because of this… > I can simply delete those files if needed Enrico > > Andor > > > > > On 2019. Oct 9., at 18:08, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 17:55 Jordan Zimmerman > ha > > s

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

+1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and exercise the code just fine with java 8. Note dep check is failing again however: jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind@2.9.10, cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and > exercise the code just fine with java 8. > > Note dep check is failing again however: > > jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar > (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databin

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

+1 Verified… - checksums, signature, - unit tests - 3-node cluster smoke tests. Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 22:40, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > >> +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and >> exercise the code ju

Jenkins build became unstable: zookeeper-master-maven #473

See