Hi,
Did you check with Accumulo community?
Do you see errors or informational messages in ZK server logs?
Enrico
Il Mar 31 Mar 2020, 01:12 karthick rn ha
scritto:
> Hello dev team,
>
> We are using Hadoop, Accumulo & Zookeeper in our environment, after
> enabling TLS for ZK we noticed that star
Hello dev team,
We are using Hadoop, Accumulo & Zookeeper in our environment, after
enabling TLS for ZK we noticed that starting Accumulo master service hangs
in an intermediate process as shown below and require to kill the process
in-order for Accumulo master to start.
[user1@host1 ~]$ jps -m
I agree with the consensus, maintaining a single version is preferable to
maintaining two.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:28 PM tison wrote:
> Never mind. Updated pr based on the consensus.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Enrico Olivelli 于2020年3月31日周二 上午2:10写道：
>
> > Tison,
> > can you please update your P
Never mind. Updated pr based on the consensus.
Best,
tison.
Enrico Olivelli 于2020年3月31日周二 上午2:10写道：
> Tison,
> can you please update your PR and drop the PY2 script ?
>
> I apologize, I asked you to keep it, we could have done it simpler :-)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 18
You may be interested in Port unification, contributed by Facebook:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3388
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3371
Enrico
Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 13:33 karthick rn
ha scritto:
>
> Hi Mate,
>
> Thanks for suggesting these opti
Lasaro Camargos created ZOOKEEPER-3775:
--
Summary: Wrong message in IOException
Key: ZOOKEEPER-3775
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3775
Project: ZooKeeper
Issue Type
Tison,
can you please update your PR and drop the PY2 script ?
I apologize, I asked you to keep it, we could have done it simpler :-)
Enrico
Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 18:43 Patrick Hunt
ha scritto:
>
> p3 is fine with me. Trying to maintain multiple can be a hassle and p2 is
> EOL alre
p3 is fine with me. Trying to maintain multiple can be a hassle and p2 is
EOL already.
Patrick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:19 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> +1 for v3 only (I have both v2/v3 interpreters, but as you mentioned, we
> should only need to maintain 1 script).
>
> - Norbert
>
> On Mon, Mar
+1 for v3 only (I have both v2/v3 interpreters, but as you mentioned, we
should only need to maintain 1 script).
- Norbert
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:35 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 13:33 Andor Molnar
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have a nice PR ab
Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 13:33 Andor Molnar
ha scritto:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We have a nice PR about upgrading the commit script to Python3:
>
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1295
>
> I think we could just drop the previous v2 version with no problem, but folks
> on the PR would
Hi folks,
We have a nice PR about upgrading the commit script to Python3:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1295
I think we could just drop the previous v2 version with no problem, but folks
on the PR would like to keep it.
Source control keeps the old version anyway and we wouldn’t need
Hi Mate,
Thanks for suggesting these options in detail
1) We are already using AdminServer as an alternate to the 4LW, hopefully
we'll look at modifying the downstream systems to use REST instead of the
4LW commands.
2) Added "clientPort=2181" back to the configs and tested "srvr" & other
whitel
Hi Karthick,
I am not sure if "echo srvr | nc localhost 2281" is expected to work
against the secure client port. I don't think so, but maybe others know
better. I think you have the following options:
1) use the admin server which is a HTTP interface where the 4LW commands
are available on a RES
13 matches
Mail list logo
