Re: GitHub "god" mode

Wow thanks Andor! On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 6:45 AM Enrico Olivelli Awesome > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019, 12:15 Andor Molnar > ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > Because we're running on GitBox now, committers are able to link their > > Apache and GitHub accounts in order to gain write

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.4-beta candidate 0

+1 downloaded, built, ran tests, did some simple manual testing, verified the keys. C On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > With heartfelt thanks to many contributors, the RC0 for 3.5.4-beta is > ready. > > 3.5.4-beta is the second beta in the planned 3.5

Re: Contributor status request

Contributor status is automatically granted to anyone who gets a change committed so go ahead and start submitting patches. Thanks for contributing! C On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 7:36 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to ask for contributor status on ZooKeeper. > I

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade 3.5 and trunk to Java8

+1 On Sun, Mar 25, 2018, 9:16 PM Michael Han wrote: > +1. > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Edward Ribeiro > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Brian Nixon > > wrote: > > > > > +1

Re: Bug in Zookeeper 3.4.11 release

Yeah, this is bad. I reviewed and merged the PR to get this process started. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Abraham Fine wrote: > I left a comment on the JIRA and I'm not sure what the conventional way to > proceed would be either. > > I think we should work to get a release

Re: Squash/fixup commits

You can find details here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Committing+changes C On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi, > > @afine raised this on my latest PR: > "going forward it would be great if you didn't squash your commits when

Re: Proposal for reworked ZK web site generation: CMS -> jekyll

+1 good idea to get this modernized thanks pat On Nov 30, 2017 2:17 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: Hi folks. After the issues a few weeks ago during the 3.4.11 release trying to get the site published and INFRA no longer supporting CMS I've gone through the effort to look at what

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

nitializeNextSession() > only some of the server ID bits are used. We could easily just mask the 2 > high bits as well. But, what are the implications of this? Where is this > serverId byte used? What must be double checked? > > -Jordan > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Cam

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

Would you rather roll back the feature or put in a fix? On Sep 20, 2017 3:44 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" wrote: > Hey Folks, > > This is very serious. Please - let's discuss immediately. I'm not certain > how to fix this. > > -JZ > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Jordan

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2792) [QP MutualAuth]: Port ZOOKEEPER-1045 implementation from branch-3.4 to branch-3.5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16137729#comment-16137729 ] Camille Fournier edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2792 at 8/23/17 1:21 AM

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2792) [QP MutualAuth]: Port ZOOKEEPER-1045 implementation from branch-3.4 to branch-3.5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16137729#comment-16137729 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2792: - I'm confused, why isn't this in HEAD

Re: Process for reviewing submitted patches?

A few thoughts: 1) It is impossible for us to set SLAs for ZK patches to be reviewed. If we were a company making money on ZK and guaranteeing support for customers who paid us, perhaps we could do that (and for all I know, it's possible that customers with contracts at various companies that rely

why is reviewbot no longer -1 on patches with no tests?

It seems like every patch without tests is being marked as a "documentation" patch but they clearly are not. Who should we ping to look at this? C

Re: ZOOKEEPER-1416

I really appreciate it > > > On Aug 10, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > I plan on looking at this soon (within a week) if no one else gets to it. > > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > > j

Re: ZOOKEEPER-1416

I plan on looking at this soon (within a week) if no one else gets to it. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < jordan.zimmer...@elastic.co> wrote: > Friendly request for more movement on ZOOKEEPER-1416 - it's now been > reviewed by multiple people and even has a backport to 3.5.x

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1442) Uncaught exception handler should exit on a java.lang.Error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16104966#comment-16104966 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1442: - Oh 2012, how we missed you. Apparently

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2770) ZooKeeper slow operation log

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100640#comment-16100640 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2770: - Are there really 10s long slow requests

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2770) ZooKeeper slow operation log

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100551#comment-16100551 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2770: - I completely agree with [~tdunning] I don't

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2733) Cleanup findbug warnings in branch-3.4: Dodgy code Warnings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058409#comment-16058409 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2733: - Did this cause a javadoc regression

Re: Ever considered using buck to build?

Did you... Just list as a con that actually it currently won't work? Does it work on Jenkins? On May 5, 2017 4:51 PM, "Patrick White" wrote: > Howdy! I'm Patrick from the core systems team at Facebook, and I work on > ZooKeeper and ZooKeeper accessories all day long. > >

Re: Introduce ZooKeeper flaky test dashboard

Awesome On Apr 11, 2017 10:33 PM, "Michael Han" wrote: > tl;dr > https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-Find-Flaky-Tests/ > lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/report.html > > > We all know quality is important to this project. One of major advantage of > ZooKeeper comparing to

Re: Contributing to Zookeeper

Hi Atri, We're always happy to have folks contribute. I would recommend starting by reading the various documentation on how to contribute, and hanging out on the mailing lists for a while to get a feel for the project. Once you see something that makes sense for your skill set, volunteer an

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2719) Port ZOOKEEPER-2169 to 3.5 branch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier resolved ZOOKEEPER-2719. - Resolution: Fixed Issue resolved by pull request 192 [https://github.com

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2724) Skip cert files for releaseaudit target.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier resolved ZOOKEEPER-2724. - Resolution: Fixed > Skip cert files for releaseaudit tar

Re: github merging?

via homebrew for > reference. Also make sure pip is installed (sudo easy_install pip). > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Also, can we get this in the 3.5 branch as well? > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:03

Re: github merging?

Also, can we get this in the 3.5 branch as well? On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm trying to follow the instructions on the wiki to approve changes: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ > Merging+Githu

github merging?

I'm trying to follow the instructions on the wiki to approve changes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Merging+Github+Pull+Requests but it does not appear to work. Specifically, this merge script: python zk-merge-pr.py is erroring out with: File

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2608) Create CLI option for TTL ephemerals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15924837#comment-15924837 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2608: - Is there a PR or just the patches here

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2608) Create CLI option for TTL ephemerals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15924824#comment-15924824 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2608: - looking > Create CLI option for

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2615) Zookeeper server holds onto dead/expired session ids in the watch data structures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15615399#comment-15615399 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2615: - Because watches are one-time triggers, you

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2615) Zookeeper server holds onto dead/expired session ids in the watch data structures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15580096#comment-15580096 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2615: - I noticed that as well. Does anyone

data race in watch removal

All, After looking into this bug report: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615 I believe we have a system-wide race with watches on the server. AFAICT, a request with a watch can be in flight at the same time a connection is being closed. If the in-flight request is executed after

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2615) Zookeeper server holds onto dead/expired session ids in the watch data structures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15576271#comment-15576271 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2615: - So it looks like all of the watches

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2615) Zookeeper server holds onto dead/expired session ids in the watch data structures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15575936#comment-15575936 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2615: - OK yup. This is a different race than what

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2615) Zookeeper server holds onto dead/expired session ids in the watch data structures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15575840#comment-15575840 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2615: - Looking > Zookeeper server holds onto d

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15560125#comment-15560125 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - [~randgalt] I wanted to leave it until we

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15558442#comment-15558442 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - This error passes locally and has nothing

Re: [VOTE] move Apache Zookeeper to git

Hey folks, So I'm trying to get in a patch but this has not been updated to tell committers how to actually get the git keys set up: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Committing+changes Can someone float me a link that says how to do this? Also a bunch of our documentation

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2608) Create CLI option for TTL ephemerals

Camille Fournier created ZOOKEEPER-2608: --- Summary: Create CLI option for TTL ephemerals Key: ZOOKEEPER-2608 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2608 Project: ZooKeeper

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-2169: Comment: was deleted (was: One thing we're missing is a zkCli option

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556059#comment-15556059 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - OK so with the exception of removing

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556039#comment-15556039 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - One thing we're missing is a zkCli option

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1502#comment-1502 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - Looks like we need you to generate a patch

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1485#comment-1485 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - I just did it, let's see if it works

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-2169: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2169-6.patch > Enable creation of nodes with T

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15552865#comment-15552865 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - Sorry [~randgalt], the asynchronicity

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461319#comment-15461319 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - My instinct is that we get this one out

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461301#comment-15461301 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - Yeah I think we probably will want

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2169) Enable creation of nodes with TTLs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461288#comment-15461288 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2169: - OK Finally looking at this in detail

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

hemeral node? My recollection is that it > currently uses the container manager instead. > > -Flavio > > > On 29 Aug 2016, at 19:19, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I'm happy to take back up the conversation of why have this at all. > > I proposed

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

has been > >> providing feedback and has some concerns. Also there is a pending issue > >> (testing) identified by Ben most recently and afaict not yet resolved. > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Camille Fournier <cami.

Re: switching to git?

I'm confused what is the actual work that needs to happen to finalize this and who is going to do that work? Ben are you volunteering or is there nothing left to do? On Aug 28, 2016 10:54 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: > :-) > > In order to make it "official" my recommendation

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

OK I'm the slacker that proposed us doing this in the first place and I'm THRILLED that you have done it Jordan, thank you so much. Pat, I can review and merge, unless you are concerned with interference on other issues. LMK. C On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Patrick Hunt

Re: Procedure for adding a new feature

We are generally open to new features if they seem useful to the wider community. The process would be to open a jira with as much information as possible including the drivers behind your use case, so that we understand the motivation and the applicability to the wider community. Best, Camille

Re: ZooKeeper release validation cluster access

but fwiw this was the 2015 flavor of my (personal) validation > process: > > http://itevenworks.net/zk-releases > > -rgs > On Jul 8, 2016 11:18 AM, "Michael Han" <h...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Sure, I will post an early version next week. > > > > On Fr

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1256) ClientPortBindTest is failing on Mac OS X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-1256: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1256v3.patch all JDK 1.4 and respects loopback check

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2104) Sudden crash of all nodes in the cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396234#comment-15396234 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2104: - Yeah, your init limit needs to be longer

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2104) Sudden crash of all nodes in the cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396172#comment-15396172 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2104: - It's hard to tell if this is just

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2104) Sudden crash of all nodes in the cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396130#comment-15396130 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2104: - Is it possible this is a clock drift

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1256) ClientPortBindTest is failing on Mac OS X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396115#comment-15396115 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1256: - So, the test says in comments that "

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1256) ClientPortBindTest is failing on Mac OS X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-1256: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1256v2.patch patch that specifies that we want

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1256) ClientPortBindTest is failing on Mac OS X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396106#comment-15396106 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1256: - I don't absolutely love the patch fix

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2368) Client watches are not disconnected on close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15373389#comment-15373389 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2368: - Yeah, I am interested in the perspective

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2368) Client watches are not disconnected on close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15373118#comment-15373118 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2368: - Hey [~randgalt] (or others) can you talk

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2368) Client watches are not disconnected on close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-2368: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Client watches are not disconnec

Re: ZooKeeper release validation cluster access

a lot of resources as the monthly credit is small, > > but should be good enough for some distributed tests: > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-community/201402.mbox/%3ccab56zcwvv5wmh99xaruldi2fvxmuj6r1axe66ul-afpo3cv...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > <

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1256) ClientPortBindTest is failing on Mac OS X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15367962#comment-15367962 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1256: - Hey [~fpj], so we're looking

Re: ZooKeeper release validation cluster access

> > > Perhaps start from phunt's smoke test? > > > > > > https://github.com/phunt/zk-smoketest > > > > > > -Flavio > > > On 7 Jul 2016 7:04 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <cami...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > >

ZooKeeper release validation cluster access

So I'm working with the CNCF to see about getting cluster access to spin up ZK clusters for release validation. I was wondering if anyone has scripts for deploying and configuring ZK clusters quickly for stress testing that we could use if we get this access? I'm sure some of you in the community

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

't > mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload logs so > that we can have a look. > > -Flavio > On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <cami...@apache.org> wrote: > > > NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this releas

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone confirm if this is an env issue? On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> wrote: > The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and does > not fail in 3.5.1. Is

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and does not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote: > I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a staging > cluster at

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

I'm working on it, but I've got test failures here because we have so many flaky tests, and I can't tell if this is just our standard level of fucked up tests or something new, or something in my setup, or what. But beyond the bind test which always fails when I run it on my macbook, the netty

Re: RC1 issues (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1)

Is this RC still under vote or is it pulled? It's hard to tell with these threads what I should be looking for when evaluating it. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > I filed ZOOKEEPER-2465 to track updating the copyright notice on all >

Re: ZK-2458 and ZK-2459

Sounds great thanks for pushing this through Chris. C On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > Thank you for the diligence on the licensing issues. I can create a new > release candidate later today. > > I'm going to be on vacation 7/7 - 7/16 and

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15222172#comment-15222172 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - OK I'm looking at this patch more carefully

[jira] [Reopened] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier reopened ZOOKEEPER-2141: - > ACL cache in DataTree never removes entr

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15217052#comment-15217052 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - Nice catch Eddie. Issue #1 is worth

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15216359#comment-15216359 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - This is great, +1 on all of it, I've

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15207534#comment-15207534 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - Into 3.5 as well. Just waiting on 3.4

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15207522#comment-15207522 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - Reviewed the patch against trunk, +1

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15204821#comment-15204821 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - Yes please just make a patch that applies

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2342) ZooKeeper cannot write logs, because there is no SLF4J binding available on the runtime classpath.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15197330#comment-15197330 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2342: - I'm +1 for reverting the breaking patch. I

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15197318#comment-15197318 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - It's failing in AsyncHammerTest. Not sure

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2141) ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15200102#comment-15200102 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2141: - This one failed on a cpp test

Re: We need to prioritize getting logging fixed in trunk/3.5

I'm a strong +1 to get this fixed even if it requires reverting the original patch. Broken logging is huge. Let's do whatever is expedient and sensible to fix it. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > Yes, that's basically my assessment too.

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I'll start responding to some of these with a link to the HTC page to help get it done. C On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull > request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.8 candidate 0

+1 Built, ran automated tests Ran manual tests Verified checksums On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan < rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Raul, +1(non-binding). > > - Built and ran tests successfully in CentOS Linux 7.0.1406 > - Ran few zkcli commands, four letter

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2159) Pluggable SASL Authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14941213#comment-14941213 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2159: - Do we have any updates on this? [~ekoontz

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2101) Transaction larger than max buffer of jute makes zookeeper unavailable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14715508#comment-14715508 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2101: - Awesome thanks [~hdeng

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2005) Failure to setCurrentEpoch on lead

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14715484#comment-14715484 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2005: - Do we believe this issue

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2145) Node can be seen but not deleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14715496#comment-14715496 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2145: - Would love to look

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2101) Transaction larger than max buffer of jute makes zookeeper unavailable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14715491#comment-14715491 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2101: - Can we get this finished up

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (ZOOKEEPER-2084) Document local session parameters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-2084: Comment: was deleted (was: very good, see here : http://wfshare.com

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2059) Use command like this ./zkCli.sh -server host:port cmd args but it doesn't work, 3.4.5 version is work fine

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier resolved ZOOKEEPER-2059. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Looks like this was fixed in later releases

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2155) network is not good, the watcher in observer env will clear

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier resolved ZOOKEEPER-2155. - Resolution: Invalid Please reopen if there is more information here network

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2238) Support limiting the maximum number of connections/clients to a zookeeper server.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14653808#comment-14653808 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2238: - Sounds like a fine feature

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha candidate 4

+1 Built the jar, ran some simple command line tests including verifying that containers worked as expected. C On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote: +1 lgtm I checked the checksums and sig. Built and tested with ant jar Checked the licenses Ran it against

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha candidate 3

I'm checking out the tag to do a check. Do we need to do anything with Ivan's -1? I don't want to spend time checking a release that can't move forward due to a -1. Thanks, C On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Flavio Junqueira flavio.junque...@gmail.com wrote: That's a good observation. The

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2217) event might lost before re-watch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14603922#comment-14603922 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2217: - [~caspian] I am closing

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >