[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1559) Learner should not snapshot uncommitted state

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14232487#comment-14232487 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1559: - this has been done in ZOOKEEPER-1549 in

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1977) Calibrate initLimit dynamically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14092638#comment-14092638 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1977: - I don't like complicated mechanism.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1977) Calibrate initLimit dynamically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14084303#comment-14084303 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1977: - In ZAB v1.0: FOLLOWERINFO -- Leader

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1519) Zookeeper Async calls can reference free()'d memory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13822117#comment-13822117 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1519: - I don't think this is a problem. The caller

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13800396#comment-13800396 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667: - LGTM, thanks [~fpj] Watch event isn't

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13796504#comment-13796504 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667: - Hi, Flavio, could you generate a patch for

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1485) client xid overflow is not handled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790263#comment-13790263 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1485: - We fixed this by use 31-bit only. client

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1485) client xid overflow is not handled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790264#comment-13790264 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1485: - As I said，it may core or hang after about

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13676717#comment-13676717 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667: - I get the definition in zookeeper.h {quote}

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1667-r34.patch Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13662994#comment-13662994 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667: - Add a patch against 3.4-branch. [~fpj]

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1693) process may core or hang when xid is overflow

Jacky007 created ZOOKEEPER-1693: --- Summary: process may core or hang when xid is overflow Key: ZOOKEEPER-1693 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1693 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1693) process may core or hang when xid is overflowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1693: Summary: process may core or hang when xid is overflowed (was: process may core or hang when

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1693) process may core or hang when xid is overflowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1693: Description: The xid will be confused with AUTHXID(-4) when it is overflowed. (was: The xid

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1693) process may core or hang when xid is overflowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1693: Description: The xid will be confused with AUTHXID(-4) when it is overflowed. If the process

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1693) process may core or hang when xid is overflowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1693: Description: The xid will be confused with AUTHXID(-4) when it is overflowed. If the process

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1690) Race condition when close session may cause a NPE in sendBuffer

Jacky007 created ZOOKEEPER-1690: --- Summary: Race condition when close session may cause a NPE in sendBuffer Key: ZOOKEEPER-1690 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1690 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1687) Number of past transactions retains in ZKDatabase.committedLog should be configurable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13631671#comment-13631671 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1687: - Duplicated to ZOOKEEPER-1473.

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1690) Race condition when close sock may cause a NPE in sendBuffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1690: Summary: Race condition when close sock may cause a NPE in sendBuffer (was: Race condition

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1552) Enable sync request processor in Observer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13628877#comment-13628877 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1552: - HI [~thawan], we commit proposal to

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1675) Make sync a quorum operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13618739#comment-13618739 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1675: - Sorry, it has nothing to do with

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1675) Make sync a quorum operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13618591#comment-13618591 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1675: - sync is an asynchronous operation, we

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1675) Make sync a quorum operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13616138#comment-13616138 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1675: - what is different between the quorum sync

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614812#comment-13614812 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1667: - I think it is. Do we need a patch for

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1669) Operations to server will be timed-out while thousands of sessions expired same time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13608802#comment-13608802 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1669: - I think it is. In one of our environment,

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1674) There is no need to clear load the database across leader election

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13609823#comment-13609823 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1674: - [~fpj] I have noticed the discussions in

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1669) Operations to server will be timed-out while thousands of sessions expired same time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13603262#comment-13603262 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1669: - We have paid for this. But the fix is

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event is handled incorrect when a client reestablish to a server

Jacky007 created ZOOKEEPER-1667: --- Summary: Watch event is handled incorrect when a client reestablish to a server Key: ZOOKEEPER-1667 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event is handled incorrect when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Description: When a client reestablish to a server, it will send the watches which have not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event is handled incorrect when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1667.patch Watch event is handled incorrect when a client

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Summary: Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server (was:

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event is handled incorrectly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Summary: Watch event is handled incorrectly when a client reestablish to a server (was: Watch

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Description: When a client reestablish to a server, it will send the watches which have not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Description: When a client reestablish to a server, it will send the watches which have not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1667) Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client reestablish to a server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1667: Description: When a client reestablish to a server, it will send the watches which have not

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571162#comment-13571162 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - [~thawan] It looks great. A question not

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1608) Add support for key-value store as optional storage engine

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13561585#comment-13561585 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1608: - @Thawan Kooburat It's a great idea. In one

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1147) Add support for local sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539402#comment-13539402 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1147: - Did I misunderstanding your description,

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1561) Zookeeper client may hang on a server restart

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539176#comment-13539176 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1561: - It was fixed in ZOOKEEPER-1560.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1147) Add support for local sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13536939#comment-13536939 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1147: - [quote] 1. zoo_init will take a flag

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537706#comment-13537706 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - The problem is when follower receives a

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537708#comment-13537708 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - {quote} Data

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537709#comment-13537709 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - I think Flavio says is the same to Thawan

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1147) Add support for local sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537719#comment-13537719 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1147: - Yeah, this is the best way to implement

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1147) Add support for local sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13534673#comment-13534673 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1147: - This is great, create session is costly in

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1493) C Client: zookeeper_process doesn't invoke completion callback if zookeeper_close has been called

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13501829#comment-13501829 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1493: - a memory leak for missing free_buffer(bptr)

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1493) C Client: zookeeper_process doesn't invoke completion callback if zookeeper_close has been called

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13501128#comment-13501128 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1493: - this patch also solve a potential hang int

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1493) C Client: zookeeper_process doesn't invoke completion callback if zookeeper_close has been called

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13501129#comment-13501129 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1493: - this patch also solve a potential hang int

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1560) Zookeeper client hangs on creation of large nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474981#comment-13474981 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1560: - I think this would work for both 1560 and

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473912#comment-13473912 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - {quote} Then, we just need to truncate the

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1561) Zookeeper client may hang on a server restart

Jacky007 created ZOOKEEPER-1561: --- Summary: Zookeeper client may hang on a server restart Key: ZOOKEEPER-1561 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1561 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-107) Allow dynamic changes to server cluster membership

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473924#comment-13473924 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-107: {quote} Do the reconfiguration tests pass for

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-107) Allow dynamic changes to server cluster membership

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473926#comment-13473926 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-107: opened an new jira ZOOKEEPER-1561 for it.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474737#comment-13474737 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - A B C D E, A propose v, B C accept it, then

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-107) Allow dynamic changes to server cluster membership

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13473117#comment-13473117 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-107: Hi Alexander Shraer, it is a bug of the java

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13471397#comment-13471397 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - Hi Flavio Junqueira, I'm sorry, I had a

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13466111#comment-13466111 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - Sorry, the code is from 3.3.x branch. Could

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13464555#comment-13464555 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - Proposal which have quorum support will be

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13463720#comment-13463720 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - Flavio Junqueira, any suggestion to this?

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13454682#comment-13454682 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - Thanks for Falvio to comment. I agree with

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Attachment: case.patch a testcase Data inconsistency when follower is

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Attachment: (was: case.patch) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Attachment: case.patch Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13453882#comment-13453882 ] Jacky007 commented on ZOOKEEPER-1549: - I've written a test case to reproduce it. I

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: ZOOKEEPER-1154 Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: the trunc code (from ZOOKEEPER-1154?) cannot work correct if the snapshot is not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: the trunc code (from ZOOKEEPER-1154?) cannot work correct if the snapshot is not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Priority: Critical (was: Major) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Affects Version/s: (was: 3.3.6) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: the trunc code (from ZOOKEEPER-1154?) cannot work correct if the snapshot is not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: the trunc code (from ZOOKEEPER-1154?) cannot work correct if the snapshot is not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1549) Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF with a dirty snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacky007 updated ZOOKEEPER-1549: Description: the trunc code (from ZOOKEEPER-1154?) cannot work correct if the snapshot is not