+1, ran various tests with zk-shell.
-rgs
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:15 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1, I have checked the following:
>
> - Signature and checksums
> - Builds locally, unit tests pass
> - NOTICE file has been updated to reflect the present year
> - Smoke tests with a local ense
+1
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Tamas Penzes wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Andor Molnar wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Let's start the vote on upgrading to Java8.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3002
> >
> > *Shall we upgrade the minimum re
congrats Abe!
-rgs
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Mohammad arshad wrote:
> Congratulations and Welcome Abe!
>
> -Arshad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Han [mailto:h...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 12:09 PM
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re: [
On 20 September 2017 at 12:54, Camille Fournier wrote:
> Ok let's take this back to either public mailing list or jira. I'd write up
> thoughts on jira and ask there+ml to look. I'll try to look tonight
>
Thanks Camille!
Also, I merged this originally so I will work with Jordan on getting this
+1 -- Is am traveling so I need a few more days to test this in one of our
dev clusters.
-rgs
On Apr 7, 2017 2:53 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
> Would it be ok to extend the vote until mid next week?
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 03 Apr 2017, at 18:26, Michael Han wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This
Congrats Michael!
On Jan 3, 2017 11:29 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
> The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Michael and
> he has accepted. Michael has made some great contributions and we are
> looking forward to even more :)
>
> Congratulations and welcome aboard, Michael!
On 18 November 2016 at 12:15, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> As Flavio said originally on this thread this is a big change. Based on the
> current status of the patch and the testing feedback it seems like we've
> done significant work to ensure the quality of the change. Do folks feel
> that there has be
Merged:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git;a=commitdiff;h=881256ea97a19e51b1c6e9a114e6e61ad83bd4ec;hp=440e0923dd9e3be533a196fdd6ada960860ca7f6
Thanks Flavio!
-rgs
On 12 November 2016 at 19:48, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> Looking
>
> On 12 November 2016
Looking
On 12 November 2016 at 11:25, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Second attempt, could any of the committers of this project take a look at
> this, please?
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 11 Nov 2016, at 08:11, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> >
> > I have made some changes to fix a couple issues with the QA for
On 6 November 2016 at 11:54, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> ZOOKEEPER-2624 has been merged, thank Raul, Ben and Michael for reviewing.
>
> The QA for pull requests should be working for pull requests agains
> master, but let's keep an eye and polish any rough edges that might still
> be there.
>
> Wit
On 5 November 2016 at 10:21, Michael Han wrote:
> >> Might as well fix the issues
> +1. Created ZOOKEEPER-2628 for this task.
>
thanks Michael!
-rgs
Thanks for contributing Eyal! The patches have been merged.
-rgs
On 7 October 2016 at 02:57, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hey Eyal,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue and producing a patch. We actually have
> some guidelines for contributing described here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc
On 12 September 2016 at 17:48, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> > On 12 September 2016 at 09:58, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> >
> >> Here it is, please take a look, review, and commit it to master
> >
On 12 September 2016 at 09:58, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Here it is, please take a look, review, and commit it to master
> (remember, needs to be git now :-) )
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2576
Merged:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git;a=commitdiff;h=8c408
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> > On 7 September 2016 at 20:44, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Chris, Raul, it looks like ZOOKEEPER-1927 is in 3.4 and trunk,
> >> however it did not land in 3.5.2 as r
On 7 September 2016 at 20:44, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Chris, Raul, it looks like ZOOKEEPER-1927 is in 3.4 and trunk,
> however it did not land in 3.5.2 as recorded in the jira.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1927
>
> I noticed this when attempting to commit
> https://issues.
+1
-rgs
On Aug 31, 2016 3:29 PM, "Benjamin Reed" wrote:
> flip the switch to git and update the relevant scripts and docs.
>
> i couldn't figure out which timeframe this falls under in the voting
> procedure table, but i think it's safe to go with 3 days, so the vote will
> close on Saturday, S
On 26 August 2016 at 10:35, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> i'm starting to get back into zk development :) i'm a bit distressed that
> we are still using svn and patches managed by jiras. i've gotten extremely
> spoiled by gerritt and phabricator over the years!
>
> as a first step to more efficient work
Thanks & congrats Chris! Great having you onboard :-)
On Aug 7, 2016 11:05 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
> In recognition of all his contributions to the project, the Apache
> ZooKeeper PMC has invited Chris Nauroth to join the PMC and he has
> accepted. I'd like to take the opportunity to thank
gt;>>at
> >>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306)
> >>>>>>at
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64)
> >>>>>>
> >>&
A bit late, but fwiw this was the 2015 flavor of my (personal) validation
process:
http://itevenworks.net/zk-releases
-rgs
On Jul 8, 2016 11:18 AM, "Michael Han" wrote:
> Sure, I will post an early version next week.
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Camille Fournier
> wrote:
>
> > That's g
+1
* ran zk-shell's test suite (all passes:
https://asciinema.org/a/buko9me6x0ct294cba5e9zk49)
* ran an Observer w/ 3.5.2-alpha taking some (light prod traffic) (all
looks good)
Thanks Chris et al!
-rgs
On 4 July 2016 at 05:31, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Tested Apache Book
I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a staging
cluster at work.
Sorry for the lag.
-rgs
On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" wrote:
Hey PMC,
Where are your votes?
-Flavio
On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" wrote:
> I need to leave for vacation now.
Hey Pat,
On 14 June 2016 at 21:18, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Raul, what's the status on this? Seems like trunk was committed but not
> 3.5? We don't want to lose track.
>
Yup - I was waiting on Chris before pushing to 3.5.
@Chris: may I push?
-rgs
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:43 A
On 7 June 2016 at 18:48, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> There is a jira for this already. Someone want to drive this one?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2399
So are we good in the 3.4 branch after:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/f0a49567d545bd6584cb8ece2d491dc6c65174f8
I suspect that anything else would be too much of a hack.
So, back to square one: we are tied with specialized classes for every new
operation. At which point, we could probably introduce Stat2 to get away of
the client-side ephemeralOwner hack. For the server-side, we are probably
out o
Hey Jordan,
On 8 May 2016 at 10:50, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Flavio,
>
> Do you think you can review and merge this change? I think the ZK
> community would really like this feature.
>
I am doing another pass now. While at it, I am thinking of this new request
type that's being introduced:
``
+1. This sounds like a good plan. Thanks Chris!
On Mar 16, 2016 9:36 AM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote:
> We now have multiple binding +1's for a revert. To finalize the plan,
> here is what I propose:
>
> 1. Full revert of ZOOKEEPER-1371, targeted to 3.5.2.
>
> 2. Retarget ZOOKEEPER-1371 to 3.5.3 with
>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira
> wrote:
> >> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat
> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =)
> >>
> >> -Flavio
> >>
> >>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08
On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
>
> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done
the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while,
it works pretty well.
Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in
g
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version
3.4.8.
ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed
applications. It exposes common services - such as naming,
configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a
simple interface so yo
Hi,
Quick reminder that the vote closes up on the 20th, it would be great to
have more votes and feedback this week. Thanks!
-rgs
On 5 February 2016 at 20:00, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.8. It fixes 9 issues, most
> notably a deadloc
This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.8. It fixes 9 issues, most
notably a deadlock when shutting down ZooKeeper.
The full release notes is available at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12326517
*** Please download, test and vote by February
Hi all,
I'll be doing the release management for 3.4.8. Initially, we wanted to
just have the fix for the shutdown synchronization issue that affected
3.4.7. But then a few more - potentially important - issues came up.
To avoid blocking people who were already waiting on the fixes in 3.4.7,
I'll
Hi Jerry,
On 31 January 2016 at 17:59, Jerry He wrote:
> Hi, Chris
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> I will watch for any 3.4.8 announcement!
>
We should have an RC soon, see: https://goo.gl/PC0gle
-rgs
>
> Jerry
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Chris Nauroth
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jerry,
>
h that's reasonable. I actually won't be able to cut an RC until Sunday,
so we have the whole weekend for that patch get more reviews :-) Thanks
Flavio!
-rgs
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 29 Jan 2016, at 10:20, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok - lets p
ts:
> >>
> >> 3.4.7 has been retracted.
> >> It would be nice to get 3.4.8 out the door soon so that zookeeper users
> >>can
> >> pick up bug fixes in between 3.4.6 and 3.4 branch.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez S
Hi,
On 28 January 2016 at 07:07, Talluri, Chandra <
chandra.tall...@fmr.com.invalid> wrote:
> Thanks for the updates.
>
> When can we expect 3.4.8?
>
I think we need to decide if we want to include these patches:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2355
https://issues.apache.org/jir
Thanks for setting this up Flavio! See you all there!
On 20 January 2016 at 08:35, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We are organizing a meetup in the Bay Area next week, and I'd love to see
> everyone who is the area there. Please check the event page and don't
> forget to RSVP:
>
> https://
Hi,
I'd like to prepare an RC for 3.4.8 soonish (hopefully, this week). For
now, this is the only blocker I can see:
ZOOKEEPER-2355: Ephemeral node is never deleted if follower fails while
reading the proposal packet
Given the magnitude of that bug, I think it should go out with this
release.
A
On 5 January 2016 at 01:44, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> With 4 +1 PMC votes(Flavio, Michi, Camille, Ivan) and one +1 committer
> vote (Chris), the vote passes. We'll remove 3.4.7 references from mirrors
> and web site as proposed.
>
> Thank you all for voting.
>
Thanks Flavio - I removed all the r
Hi,
On 18 December 2015 at 01:49, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> The plan is indeed to cut an RC for 3.4.8 early January with this issue
> fixed. Raul volunteered to do it, but because folks will be away during the
> holidays, I'm suggesting we wait until after the holidays to bootstrap the
> process
Hi Tim,
On 8 December 2015 at 18:58, Crowder Tim wrote:
> Tangentially related question...
>
> I have a C++ cli for zookeeper modeled after unix shell.
> It has ls (with lots of options including recursive, long, and ACL
> listing),
> cp, touch, cat, etc. And command/filename completion and hist
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version
3.4.7
ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed
applications. It exposes common services - such as naming,
configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a
simple interface so you
On 20 November 2015 at 15:46, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> On 20 November 2015 at 15:41, Charles Strahan
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to provide the following fix for ZOOKEEPER-1929
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
Hi Charles,
On 20 November 2015 at 15:41, Charles Strahan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to provide the following fix for ZOOKEEPER-1929
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1929):
>
Thanks for the patch! Mind attaching it to the ticket? We require patches
to be in JIRA
before we me
M, Rakesh Radhakrishnan
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> +1(non-binding). I've built and tested with ant jar, ran few zkcli
> >>>> commands, four letter words, tested against Hadoop-2.7.1 small
> cluster env.
> >>>>
> >>>>
This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.7. It fixes 79 issues, including
issues that affect followers after elections, being unable to delete a node
when it has no children, crashes with random input from the network on the
QuorumCnxManager, deadlocks during bad network conditions and others.
T
On 22 October 2015 at 14:31, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> If you have a patch by the end of today for ZK-1029, I'll review it before
> you wake up tomorrow.
>
Flavio fixed this one, so we are good to go!
I will punt everything else to 3.4.8 and cut an RC afterwards :-) Thanks!
-rgs
On 22 October 2015 at 14:07, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Raul,
>
> I'd need some time to dig into ZK-832, but from the description I don't
> think it is a blocker. As I understand this is happening because the server
> lost persistent state, and this is isn't a common scenario in a replicated
> dep
On 5 October 2015 at 11:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 23:15, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23 August 2015 at 14:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 August 2015 at 14:44, Ra
On 8 September 2015 at 23:15, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 August 2015 at 14:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
>
>> On 23 August 2015 at 14:44, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> sorry about
Hi,
On 23 August 2015 at 14:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> On 23 August 2015 at 14:44, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> sorry about dropping the ball here. So going over the unresolved issues,
>> I think these ones would be ni
On 23 August 2015 at 14:44, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry about dropping the ball here. So going over the unresolved issues, I
> think these ones would be nice to tackle before cutting an RC:
>
> * ZOOKEEPER-1833: fix windows build (one sub-task still opened
marked for 3.4.7: http://s.apache.org/95J
>
> We should triage them and decide whether they need to be fixed in
> 3.4.7 or then can be pushed out to 3.4.8.
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> > On Apr 30, 2015 7:51 PM, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés&q
Hi Rakesh,
On 21 August 2015 at 00:07, Rakesh R wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It seems the trunk documentation http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/
> is showing very old pages and last published on 10/08/2014 14:59:37.
> I could see the "Trunk" url link in http://zookeeper.apache.org page is
> pointi
+1
My testing was:
* 3 participants + 2 observers using systemd-nspawn
* triggered elections
* ran some smoke tests with zk-shell along with more elections
All looks good. Thanks Michi!
-rgs
On 9 July 2015 at 15:23, Hongchao Deng wrote:
> +1.Ran unit test and some basic programs. It went pr
Hi,
On 24 June 2015 at 14:58, Crowder Tim wrote:
> Hi All-
>
> Any chance of getting a review for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1525
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33874/
>
> It's been idle for about 6 weeks.
>
I'll take a look - thanks for pinging the list.
-rgs
On 20 June 2015 at 17:07, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
> I updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2210 to
> address feedback from Chris. Could somebody take a look? Thanks!
>
Merged - thanks!
-rgs
On 15 June 2015 at 15:18, Alexander Shraer wrote:
> Should we get a fix for ZOOKEEPER-2212 in this release ?
>
Yeah - it would be nice. Is it ready to go?
-rgs
I can't confirm this since I don't have OS X, but I think the C library is
broken there because of this change:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/41c9fcb3ca09cd3d05e59fe47f08ecf0b85532c8
(got some reports on #zookeeper today, not sure if that's a showstopper for
the RC - probably it is).
On 8 June 2015 at 11:21, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
> On 8 June 2015 at 11:13, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Sounds reasonable. I have reached out personally in the past, but
>> having it be automated would be good. Perhaps you can discuss with the
>> apache infra tea
hread with what's possible.
-rgs
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> > One final note for posterity and people interested in using PRs for the
> > review process
> > at least (which I guess is ok) is that t
/apache/zookeeper/pull/33
I guess it would be nice if the Bot also commented on PRs pointing out
to the `How to Contribute` link or simply saying that you need to create a
JIRA and
then you can reference it from your PR.
-rgs
On 8 June 2015 at 10:09, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
> On 8 J
On 8 June 2015 at 10:07, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Keep in mind that filing the jira, attaching the patch file, etc...
> are all demonstrating intent of the author to contribute the changes
> under the apache license conditions. Jira is part of IP tracking. If
> you file the jira for them we lose tha
>
> >>I personally don't think that having a single record of truth and asking
> >>people to use that record is asking too much. I'm not in favor at all of
> >>removing the requirement for tickets to track work. Perhaps if we were
> >>entirely in git
, so I think
there is value in allowing
pull requests as a submission mechanism (for some cases?), since it'll make
the eventual transition
smoother and with less unknowns.
-rgs
> C
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> r...@itevenworks.net>
>
Heya,
there's an increasing number of pull requests (PRs) coming through github
(great! more contributions!). How do we deal with them? Do we need to file
a corresponding JIRA before we merge them or can we just reference the PR?
I rather not tax the contributors with having to file the JIRA, but
n Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > So in this issue:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2197
> >
> > we ran into a problem with utf-8 chars. How what about we teach javac to
> >
Heya,
So in this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2197
we ran into a problem with utf-8 chars. How what about we teach javac to
treat
all files as utf-8? Would that be a problem for anyone/any platform?
Something like
this in build.xml:
On May 16, 2015 11:59 PM, "Michi Mutsuzaki" wrote:
>
> I was reading an article about hadoop migrating from svn to git, and
> started wondering if we should consider migrating to git. Do you guys
> think it's worth all the hassle (I'm guessing the migration involves a
> fair amount of work) to mig
On Apr 30, 2015 7:51 PM, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés"
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I went over all the tickets and I think we should be able to close them
over the next week:
>
> http://goo.gl/6Jjtj1
>
> After that, I'll cut an RC if that sounds reasonable. T
On 8 May 2015 at 20:29, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 16:57, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> I think it's more a consistency thing than anything.
>>
>
> Hmm, it does lead to some code duplication which makes the
> PrepRequestProcessor considerably
On 8 May 2015 at 16:57, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> I think it's more a consistency thing than anything.
>
Hmm, it does lead to some code duplication which makes the
PrepRequestProcessor considerably longer. I'll propose this patch (written
by Santtu) in a JIRA:
https://gist.github.com/rgs1/1fd74c4d6
On 8 May 2015 at 15:24, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> But that could’ve been done with just the new opcode of
> ZooDefs.OpCode.create2, right? I need to understand if I need a new Request
> class for the container feature or not.
>
Why would you need that for ZOOKEEPER-2163 if you'd just be using a
Hi,
On 8 May 2015 at 15:24, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> But that could’ve been done with just the new opcode of
> ZooDefs.OpCode.create2, right? I need to understand if I need a new Request
> class for the container feature or not.
>
It should work, the structs are the same except for the opcode.
On 8 May 2015 at 09:46, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> There's a great post on Pager Duty today,
>
> http://www.pagerduty.com/blog/the-discovery-of-apache-zookeepers-poison-packet/
> some good comments on hackernews too
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9509698
>
> If I understand correctly bug1 is a
Hi,
On 8 May 2015 at 09:46, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> There's a great post on Pager Duty today,
>
> http://www.pagerduty.com/blog/the-discovery-of-apache-zookeepers-poison-packet/
> some good comments on hackernews too
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9509698
>
> If I understand correctly bug1
On 3 May 2015 at 23:26, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
>
> On 3 May 2015 at 23:07, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
>
>> Thanks Raul, I'll review and commit ZOOKEEPER-2171.
>
>
> Test passed now:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2674/
>
&
On 3 May 2015 at 23:07, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
> Thanks Raul, I'll review and commit ZOOKEEPER-2171.
Test passed now:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2674/
> Please go ahead
> and check in ZOOKEEPER-2124 for 3.5.1.
>
Sure.
-rgs
On 3 May 2015 at 20:53, Patrick Hunt wrote:
(...)
> Trunk tests seem pretty stable - where I do see issues recently it's mostly
> a single test that seems to be intermittently failing:
> ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig
> I see someone opened a jira then closed it,
Hi,
On 3 May 2015 at 12:53, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> ()
> 3. Tests are non-deterministic, such as by hard-coding a sleep time to
> wait for an asynchronous action to complete. The solutions usually
> involve providing hooks into lower-layer logic, such as to receive a
> callback from the asyn
On 2 May 2015 at 15:45, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> I'd say if it's a blocker and it's ready (or close to ready) then wait. Otw
> let's get the release out. It's ok for the alphas to have blockers, we'll
> catch them up in the next release.
>
fwiw, ZOOKEEPER-2171 has a +1 from Rakesh and is ready to b
Hi all,
This has probably come up before but do we have any thoughts on making CI
better? Is the problem jenkins? Is it flaky tests? Bad CI workers? All of
the above?
I see we waste loads of time with trivial (or unrelated to the actual
failures) patches triggering failed builds all the time. I'd
Hi all,
I went over all the tickets and I think we should be able to close them
over the next week:
http://goo.gl/6Jjtj1
After that, I'll cut an RC if that sounds reasonable. Thanks!
-rgs
On 21 April 2015 at 21:22, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> That's always going to be the case. There will be some
t; >>
> >> You might update the notice file to include 2015 at the same time (not a
> >> blocker typically though).
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> r...@itevenworks.net
> >>> w
On 20 April 2015 at 13:03, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> -1, alas.
>
> I think ZOOKEEPER-1506 could be problematic for some setups. After a
> couple of elections with a cluster of 5 participants and one observer, I
> end up with a participant that's unable to find the le
On 20 April 2015 at 13:18, Flavio Junqueira
wrote:
> Please reopen ZK-1506, Raul.
>
Done - I'll post my (hopefully reproducible) setup in a bit. I guess that
patch might be triggering reverse lookups as an (undesired) side effect.
-rgs
-1, alas.
I think ZOOKEEPER-1506 could be problematic for some setups. After a couple
of elections with a cluster of 5 participants and one observer, I end up
with a participant that's unable to find the leader because it does a
reverse lookup (IP -> hostname) and ends up with a bogus hostname tha
On 17 April 2015 at 01:20, Flavio Junqueira
wrote:
> I have volunteered to RM 3.4.7, but I'm more than happy to pass if anyone
> else wants to do a release.
>
I am interested in going through the release process as the RM, that way I
could then volunteer with the 3.5.x releases
as well.
I'll pi
Hi Gil,
On 6 April 2015 at 18:12, ZhaoHui wrote:
> Hi, Master,
> I am recently research zookeeper and its client. When I try to program
> with native C client, I found a bug on Windows (this issue is never shown
> on Linux). I would help fix the issue. Would you please let me know how to
> commi
+1
It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1998
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2051
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2098
thanks Patrick!
-rgs
On 5 February 2015 at 11:22, Michi Mutsuzaki w
Oops, the release link was wrong:
On 24 December 2014 at 16:31, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> Today I've released version 1.0.0:
>
> https://github.com/twitter/zktraffic/releases/tag/0.1.0
>
Meant: https://github.com/rgs1/zk_shell/releases/tag/v1.0.0
-rgs
Hi all,
For some months now I've been using zk-shell, a powerful alternative to
zkCli, to operate & debug ZooKeeper clusters:
https://github.com/rgs1/zk_shell
Today I've released version 1.0.0:
https://github.com/twitter/zktraffic/releases/tag/0.1.0
It's also available via PyPI (i.e.: pip inst
On 30 September 2014 09:31, Hongchao Deng wrote:
> My first thought is to make it *Oct 30 or Nov 4*.
>
> So far I have Jordan, Michi, and Alex volunteer to present. Let me know if
> more people want to. I will work out more details within the company and
> create a meetup event later.
>
Those da
On 30 August 2014 11:37, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> JDK8 update 20 (just out) has a pretty cool new feature that might
> work great for us - string de-duplication at the GC level, check it
> out:
>
> https://twitter.com/phunt/status/505509298990891008
>
Very cool - have you (or someone) tried it with
On 24 July 2014 09:47, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> We've identified the issues with 1987, it would be good if folks could
> take a look.
Great - thanks Patrick. Added some comments to the patch.
> Nothing looks unsolvable, but we should tweak things a
> bit before 3.5.0, esp given the current upgra
On 23 July 2014 14:48, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> FYI: Currently running some tests and I'm about to create the
> branch-3.5 branch.
>
w00t :-)
-rgs
to
> >>> >>> include the c tests stdout redirect. So while it won't go to
> console
> >>> >>> at least we can debug when there is a failure.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Raul has been helping Bill with reviews for the je
On 14 July 2014 19:36, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Update: we're back to 8 blockers on 3.5.0 (not clear to me which
> one(s?) is new?)
>
> Looks like the autoconf issue I reported is hitting the upgraded
> apache jenkins instances as well. I've updated the "archive" list to
> include the c tests stdout
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
