[GitHub] zookeeper issue #165: ZOOKEEPER-2665 Port QA github pull request build to br...

2017-03-14 Thread hanm
Github user hanm commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/165 @eolivelli - can you please also closing this pull request? On a side note, this patch works, I see my PR to branch 3.5 is now kicking build bots. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #165: ZOOKEEPER-2665 Port QA github pull request build to br...

2017-03-07 Thread hanm
Github user hanm commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/165 Thanks @eolivelli, this is merged in 3.4. and 3.5. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #165: ZOOKEEPER-2665 Port QA github pull request build to br...

2017-03-06 Thread eolivelli
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/165 @hanm the patch is almost the same as for trunk, just a work of "copy and paste" Eventually you can compare the diff with #97 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #165: ZOOKEEPER-2665 Port QA github pull request build to br...

2017-03-06 Thread hanm
Github user hanm commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/165 I think it is fine to leave the names as they are for now and later update scripts for all branches all together. @eolivelli - are there any specific changes you made on top of

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #165: ZOOKEEPER-2665 Port QA github pull request build to br...

2017-02-14 Thread eolivelli
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/165 @eribeiro that you for reviewing this. IMHO it it just a variable name. The script is basically the same as in the trunk version. I think it would be better to leave all versions as much