ing we shouldn't do this (not a -1 from my side), I just
> > have
> > > >> my concerns mentioned above.
> > > >>
> > > >> Is there any Apache project doing this? Just out of curiosity.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > &g
;m not saying we shouldn't do this (not a -1 from my side), I just
> have
> > >> my concerns mentioned above.
> > >>
> > >> Is there any Apache project doing this? Just out of curiosity.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Norb
e any Apache project doing this? Just out of curiosity.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Norbert
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:34 PM Justin Ling Mao <
> maoling199210...@sina.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1,A ver
viewers' name.For the incentive, if someone participate
>> in the review of PR, no matter whether he/she is a committer, we all need
>> include his/her name?
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Norbert Kalmar
>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
&
suggest about the
>>> sign-off of the Reviewers' name.For the incentive, if someone participate
>>> in the review of PR, no matter whether he/she is a committer, we all need
>>> include his/her name?
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> F
r the incentive, if someone participate in the
> review of PR, no matter whether he/she is a committer, we all need include
> his/her name?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Norbert Kalmar
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: [Suggestion] Use Co-authored-by in commit
: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject: [Suggestion] Use Co-authored-by in commit messages
Date: 2019-05-08 17:36
Hi Devs,
I've got this idea from HBase.
So: when there is a patch that is abandoned by its original author for any
reason, and it can no longer be merged, someone comes by, and asks t
Hi Devs,
I've got this idea from HBase.
So: when there is a patch that is abandoned by its original author for any
reason, and it can no longer be merged, someone comes by, and asks to
continue to work on it. Usually the reply is to use the change freely or no
reply at all. Either way, what people
