+1, ran various tests with zk-shell.
-rgs
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:15 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1, I have checked the following:
>
> - Signature and checksums
> - Builds locally, unit tests pass
> - NOTICE file has been updated to reflect the present year
> - Smoke tests with a local ense
+1, I have checked the following:
- Signature and checksums
- Builds locally, unit tests pass
- NOTICE file has been updated to reflect the present year
- Smoke tests with a local ensemble
- Maven project is able to resolve zookeeper dependency using the staging
repository
- Release notes
-Flavi
Thanks Pat!
ZooKeeper PMCs,
Please vote on the release.
Thanks,
Andor
> On 2019. Mar 13., at 11:07, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> +1 - sig/xsum verified, rat ran clean, was able to run various ensemble
> sizes successfully.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:56 AM Andor Molnar wrote:
>
+1 - sig/xsum verified, rat ran clean, was able to run various ensemble
sizes successfully.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:56 AM Andor Molnar wrote:
> This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.14. It fixes 8 issues, mostly
> build / unit tests issues,
> dependency updates flagged by OWASP,
+1 (non binding)
checked signatures/checksums
run Java tests with ANT on java 11 (adoptopenjdk 11.0.2)
run smoke tests (3 nodes cluster/zkCli.sh, with java 8/11
Enrico
Il giorno mar 12 mar 2019 alle ore 10:48 Norbert Kalmar
ha scritto:
>
> I'm fine with this RC, this jar was shipped in prior r
I'm fine with this RC, this jar was shipped in prior releases as well.
(Might I even say someone may be using this jar from the tarball? :) I
know, hardly the case...)
Anyway, we can remove the jar, and it will be removed from tarball with the
next release if we want. Or wait for a new RC if others
Hi Enrico,
Thanks for pointing that out.
I talked to Norbert and Patrick about that and mentioned we were shipping
that jar in previous releases too, so it should be fine in licensing wise.
I'm happy to create another RC if other people think we should take that
one out too, but it seems to me we
Before sending my vote I found a audience-annotations-0.5.0.jar
Is it needed at runtime?
I did not yet have time to check
Enrico
Il gio 7 mar 2019, 15:23 Norbert Kalmar ha
scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> checked signatures and checksums
> built from source (oracle jdk8 and openjdk 11.0.2)
> ru
+1 (non-binding)
checked signatures and checksums
built from source (oracle jdk8 and openjdk 11.0.2)
run java tests (openjdk 11.0.2)
run native tests
checked jar files and license files compared to 3.4.13 (didn't see any
extra jars this time)
run zk in a 3-node ensemble (openjdk 11.0.2)
run cli an
This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.14. It fixes 8 issues, mostly build
/ unit tests issues,
dependency updates flagged by OWASP, NPE and a name resolution problem. Among
these it also supports
experimental Maven build and Markdown based documentation generation.
The full release notes is
10 matches
Mail list logo
