[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065400#comment-13065400
 ] 

Utkarsh Srivastava commented on BOOKKEEPER-33:
----------------------------------------------

Seems like adding the offset and length is a good enhancement in itself.

There is another unrelated enhancement which is to take ByteBuffer directly in 
case of NIO clients that read it from somewhere and want to log it to 
Bookkeeper without copying. Agreed that a second enhancement is probably a 
separate JIRA.

> Add length and offset parameter to addEntry
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-33
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-33
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>
> <from email to dev list>
> I'm having an issue with the LedgerHandle#addEntry api.
> [1] best illustrates it. I'm buffering namenode transactions in the stream 
> and only transmitting when either flush is called or I have enough data to 
> pass my threshold. This means I have a byte buffer in my class which I fill 
> up as new transactions come in. When I transmit, I set this buffer as an 
> entry to bookkeeper. I.e. N whole namenode transactions will be contained in 
> 1 single bk entry. 
> The problem is this byte buffer (DataOutputBuffer in this case). I reuse the 
> same buffer over and over. But this buffer has a fixed size. If I transmit 
> before it is full, the whole buffer size will be transmitted anyhow. If the 
> buffer is being reused, this will retransmit old transactions out of order. 
> For example, in the first use, the buffer fills with, [a,b,c,d,e] and adds 
> this as an entry and resets the byte buffer. Then transaction f is  added and 
> flushed, in this case [f,b,c,d,e] is not transmitted. 
> What I need is the ability to set offset and length in the byte[] passed to 
> addEntry. Is there a reason this wasn't added in the initial implementation? 
> If not, and if you agree this is a valid usecase, ill open a JIRA and add 
> this functionality. Im getting around this now by doing an extra Array.copyOf 
> which is less than ideal.
> </from email>

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to