Il giorno ven 16 ott 2020 alle ore 16:07 Christopher
ha scritto:
> Since rat runs fairly quickly, and because it enforces license header
> requirements that are mandated by ASF policy I find it very useful.
>
> However, I just ran into
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3974, so ra
Since rat runs fairly quickly, and because it enforces license header
requirements that are mandated by ASF policy I find it very useful.
However, I just ran into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3974, so rat check
only works on a clean checkout... and only before the generate-sourc
Spotbugs is too heavy so I prefer to have it disabled by default.
Rat is not very useful so it is a no for me
Enrico
Il Ven 16 Ott 2020, 15:35 Christopher ha scritto:
> What about apache-rat and spotbugs? Should those execute by default also?
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 9:29 AM Enrico Olivelli
What about apache-rat and spotbugs? Should those execute by default also?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 9:29 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Christopher,
> I think it is only a leftover of the adoption of checkstyle.
>
> Feel free to send a patch and activate it by default
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Ven 16 Ott
Christopher,
I think it is only a leftover of the adoption of checkstyle.
Feel free to send a patch and activate it by default
Enrico
Il Ven 16 Ott 2020, 15:25 Christopher ha scritto:
> Hi ZK Devs,
>
> I am working on ZOOKEEPER-3973 and I noticed the existing Travis CI
> job executes `checkst
Hi ZK Devs,
I am working on ZOOKEEPER-3973 and I noticed the existing Travis CI
job executes `checkstyle:check` on the command line. I checked the
pom.xml files and there is an execution defined in the
`` section of the main pom.xml and another one in
the zookeeper-contrib/pom.xml. However, neithe
