e=100 --synchronous
> - Original Message -
> From: Patrick Hunt
> To: DevZooKeeper , maoling199210...@sina.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2
> Date: 2019-04-08 12:24
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:47 PM Justin Ling Ma
them? What
about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both.
Regards,
Patrick -[2]: zkCli test passed.(base operation:create,set,get,delete ...etc)
+1.
- Original Message -
From: Enrico Olivelli
To: DevZooKeeper
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2
u rebuild them?
What about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both.
Regards,
Patrick
> -[2]: zkCli test passed.(base operation:create,set,get,delete ...etc)
> +1.
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: Enrico Olivelli
> To: DevZooKeeper
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:37 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> -1 (non binding)
>
> Good news:
> I have build the sources with jdk-8 and all tests passed
> checksums and signatures are ok
> I run a few smoke tests running on JDK11, all is ok
>
> Bad news:
> I see the following problems in the "binary
Tamas,
Il sab 6 apr 2019, 10:47 Tamas Penzes ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Just my 2cents.
>
> Having the sources jars in the binary package can be useful if you want to
> debug without downloading the source tarball or checking out the whole
> project from github. In the same time it is not
-1 (non binding)
Good news:
I have build the sources with jdk-8 and all tests passed
checksums and signatures are ok
I run a few smoke tests running on JDK11, all is ok
Bad news:
I see the following problems in the "binary package", not all blockers:
- we have a lib/cobertura directory, not
