> For BOOKKEEPER-90, I still need to decide what to do about ByteString if we
> do anything at all. Having ByteString in the API tries us to google
> protobufs. Im not sure this is a huge issue, but it means that this API will
> never be able to move away from it.
Another open issue is that Hed
Yes, I agree on the 4.0 release thing. It will make it clear that there's been
a big change.
I've created two JIRAs for the changes, BOOKKEEPER-89 for bookkeeper,
BOOKKEEPER-90 for hedwig. Please have a look [1][2].
BOOKKEEPER-89 is complete.
For BOOKKEEPER-90, I still need to decide what to d
I think it makes sense to delay the release if required for this
cleanup. Such cleanup will get only harder after the release.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hi Ivan, Thanks for putting this list together. I don't have a good sense of
> how many changes the modificatio
Hi Ivan, Thanks for putting this list together. I don't have a good
sense of how many changes the modifications you're proposing would
induce. My concern is delaying the release further, even though I
agree that cleaning up the interfaces is important.
Also, I was thinking that some public
