1! Thanks so much for getting things resolved so
> quickly!
>
> - Hongchao Deng
>
>> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:21:02 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>> From: mi...@cs.stanford.edu
>> To: rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com
>> CC: dev@zookeeper.ap
Nice work for releasing 3.5.1! Thanks so much for getting things resolved so
quickly!
- Hongchao Deng
> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:21:02 -0700
> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> From: mi...@cs.stanford.edu
> To: rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com
> CC: dev@zookeeper.apache.
gt;> Rakesh
>> >>>>> ____
>> >>>>> 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁
>> >>>>> 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中
>> >>>>> 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
>&g
> >>> Rakesh
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: mutsuz...@gmail.com [mailto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Michi Mutsuzaki
> >>> Sent: 15 March 2015 13:57
> >>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> >>> Subject:
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rakesh
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: mutsuz...@gmail.com [mailto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Michi
>>> Mutsuzaki
>>> Sent: 15 March 2015 13:57
>>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
>>&g
gt; >>
> >> FYI: We have done ZOOKEEPER-2107 and ZOOKEEPER-2125. ZOOKEEPER-1506 is
> pending.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rakesh
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: mutsuz...@gmail.com [mailto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Michi
lto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Michi
>> Mutsuzaki
>> Sent: 15 March 2015 13:57
>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>>
>> I think we are good to go once we get in these 3 patch-availables:
>>
>> http
essage-
> From: mutsuz...@gmail.com [mailto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Michi
> Mutsuzaki
> Sent: 15 March 2015 13:57
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>
> I think we are good to go once we get in these 3 patch-availables:
>
>
lete it!
>> From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09
>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org; mi...@cs.stanford.edu; Rakesh R
>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>>
>> We should be able to have it in before the end of t
email immediately and delete it!
>> From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09
>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org; mi...@cs.stanford.edu; Rakesh R
>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>>
>> We should be able to have i
d only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> >>> above. Any use of the
> >>> >> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited
> >>> to, total or partial
> >>> >> disclosure, reproduction, or disseminat
se address is listed
>>> above. Any use of the
>>> >> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited
>>> to, total or partial
>>> >> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
>>> intended
>>
gt; information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited
>> to, total or partial
>> >> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
>> intended
>> >> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error,
&
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
> intended
> >> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender by
> >> phone or email immediately and delete it!
> >> From: Flavio Junqueira [mail
ecipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
>> notify the sender by
>> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>> From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09
>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org;
15 02:09
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org; mi...@cs.stanford.edu; Rakesh R
> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>
> We should be able to have it in before the end of this week. I'm currently
> reviewing it.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:03 PM
bject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
It would be great if somebody can review ZOOKEEPER-1506.
Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to 3.5.1?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks, just checking in. Any reason we shouldn't do a releas
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!
From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09
To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org; mi...@cs.stanford.edu; Rakesh R
Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release
push ZOOKEEPER-2125 and move this forward :)
- Hongchao Deng
> From: rake...@huawei.com
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org; mi...@cs.stanford.edu
> Subject: RE: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:54:01 +
>
> >>>>> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you thi
om [mailto:mutsuz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Michi
> Mutsuzaki
> Sent: 10 March 2015 12:10
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
>
> It would be great if somebody can review ZOOKEEPER-1506.
> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch sho
Awesome. Thanks Michi!
On Tue, 3/10/15, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
To: "Crowder Tim"
Cc: "dev@zookeeper.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2015, 12:03 AM
I'll review
ZO
--
> On Mon, 3/9/15, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> To: "dev@zookeeper.apache.org"
> Date: Monday, March 9, 2015, 11:39 PM
>
> It would be great if somebody can
> review ZOOKEEPER-1506.
&g
Hi All-
Any chance of ZOOKEEPER-1525 making it in?
(It was incorrectly listed as included in the changelog for 3.5.0).
Thanks!
.timrc
On Mon, 3/9/15, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
To: &quo
It would be great if somebody can review ZOOKEEPER-1506.
Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to 3.5.1?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks, just checking in. Any reason we shouldn't do a release in
> the near future? Anything pending that absolutely
Hi folks, just checking in. Any reason we shouldn't do a release in
the near future? Anything pending that absolutely needs to get in?
Patrick
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. Let's try to get these in, but depending on how
> much progress we make we might
Sounds reasonable. Let's try to get these in, but depending on how
much progress we make we might need to cut off at some point an push a
release. They can always catch the next train.
I'll try to update the jira list over the weekend, clean them up and
see where we are.
Patrick
On Thu, Feb 5, 2
I'd like to get ZOOKEEPER-1506 in.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> I'd like to see the SSL work in for the next release.
>
> -Flavio
>
>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 19:34, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these
I'd like to see the SSL work in for the next release.
-Flavio
> On 05 Feb 2015, at 19:34, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
>
> +1
>
> It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these in:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1998
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOO
+1
It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1998
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2051
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2098
thanks Patrick!
-rgs
On 5 February 2015 at 11:22, Michi Mutsuzaki w
+1 I can check in ZOOKEEPER-1366 tonight.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> +1 for 3.5.1-alpha release
>
> I think its good to include the following jira issues:
>
> ZOOKEEPER-1366 (so far we got two +1)
> ZOOKEEPER-1907 (its not blocking, good to have imprv)
+1 for 3.5.1-alpha release
I think its good to include the following jira issues:
ZOOKEEPER-1366 (so far we got two +1)
ZOOKEEPER-1907 (its not blocking, good to have imprv)
Best Regards,
Rakesh
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks. 3.5.0-alpha has been out
Hi folks. 3.5.0-alpha has been out for a bit now, we've gotten some
good feedback and a number of jira issues have been resolved. What do
you think about putting out an updated 3.5.1-alpha release with the
latest changes? Anything blocking us or that you feel important to
include?
Regards,
Patric
32 matches
Mail list logo
