Re: Re: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-16 Thread Justin Ling Mao
; Is it right? - Original Message - From: Enrico Olivelli To: DevZooKeeper , maoling199210...@sina.com Subject: Re: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release? Date: 2019-07-15 21:55 Justin, I think that current master has already plenty of new features and it is worth to start thinking to a rele

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-16 Thread Andor Molnar
ture. Look at an example of redis - the tracing >> feature(PR-994). if having another time, integrating with opentracing >> sounds a very good idea. - replace jute with thrift or PB may be put >> into the 4.0.0 when wanting to break the backward compatibility? And at the >> 4.0.0,

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-16 Thread Norbert Kalmar
ure. Look at an example of redis > > - the tracing feature(PR-994). if having another time, integrating with > opentracing sounds a very good idea. > > - replace jute with thrift or PB may be put into the 4.0.0 when wanting > to break the backward compatibility? And at the 4.0.0, implemen

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-15 Thread Andor Molnar
ea. > Thanks, Andor > > > - Original Message - > From: Fangmin Lv > To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > Subject: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release? > Date: 2019-06-26 07:33 > > It's great to have a 3.6.0 release, currently all the FB contributed > featu

Re: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
good idea. > > > > - Original Message - > From: Fangmin Lv > To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > Subject: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release? > Date: 2019-06-26 07:33 > > It's great to have a 3.6.0 release, currently all the FB contributed > features has been

Re: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-07-15 Thread Justin Ling Mao
. - Original Message - From: Fangmin Lv To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release? Date: 2019-06-26 07:33 It's great to have a 3.6.0 release, currently all the FB contributed features has been running inside FB for more than a month, so it should be stable enough

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-26 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il mer 26 giu 2019, 11:20 Norbert Kalmar ha scritto: > Sorry, correction, I just followed up on ZOOKEEPER-2136, patch is not > ready, and maybe not even a blocker for 3.6.0? > I would drop 3.6.0 label from ZOOKEEPER-2136, I have already commented (with Patrick) on that issue about setting

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-26 Thread Norbert Kalmar
Sorry, correction, I just followed up on ZOOKEEPER-2136, patch is not ready, and maybe not even a blocker for 3.6.0? On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Hi Fangmin, > > I checked all 3 PRs, looks like they pretty much reviewed, some minor > questions remain. > But we have

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-26 Thread Norbert Kalmar
Hi Fangmin, I checked all 3 PRs, looks like they pretty much reviewed, some minor questions remain. But we have 302 tickets open where fixVersion is 3.6.0, good news is only 1 blocker (ZOOKEEPER-2136), which already has a patch. I'll see that this blocker gets committed. There is also 9 critical

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-26 Thread Andor Molnar
Thanks Fangmin for pointing out these issues. I’ll take a look at them once I have some free cycles - currently on holiday. :) We should consider compiling a list of 3.6 blockers in Jira similar what we had for 3.5. Andor > On 2019. Jun 26., at 1:26, Fangmin Lv wrote: > > It's great to

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-25 Thread Fangmin Lv
It's great to have a 3.6.0 release, currently all the FB contributed features has been running inside FB for more than a month, so it should be stable enough for community to use. Also I agreed with Patrick's point to review all flags and consider to turn on by default. For the pending PRs, the

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-15 Thread Patrick Hunt
Good idea. Agree on including anything we've postponed to a new cycle - the patch from mapr is an obvious one to consider. We should also look at things we've disabled by default and consider whether we can turn them on by default. If not why not, and what can we do to fix this in a subsequent

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-15 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
On Persistent/Recursive watches: I’m willing to rebase, etc if there’s confidence it will be merged. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jun 15, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi Enrico! > > Very good point, I entirely support the idea. > > Question to Friends@Facebook

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-15 Thread Andor Molnar
Hi Enrico! Very good point, I entirely support the idea. Question to Friends@Facebook and Twitter contributors: how many outstanding Jiras/PRs do you have which you would like to see in 3.6? I'd also like to highlight the long outstanding PR from Mapr:

Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

2019-06-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi Zookeepers ! I checked on JIRA and it seems that master in good shape, no real blockers that mine the stability of the code. We have plenty of cool pull requests almost ready to be merged (mostly from Facebook friends and Twitter fork) Current master branch is full of great features in