[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michi Mutsuzaki updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.0)
3.6.0
> GSoC 2010: Fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13788770#comment-13788770
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Best way to address big patches i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13788229#comment-13788229
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
The good news in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13788207#comment-13788207
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
I know, it is a shame tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13788204#comment-13788204
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Is there any news of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mahadev konar updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.4.0)
3.5.0
I think we should move this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053348#comment-13053348
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Your plan sounds reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053326#comment-13053326
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
camille/flavio,
I am also a li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053266#comment-13053266
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Well, I finally got th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053170#comment-13053170
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Should we keep this i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041364#comment-13041364
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on ZOOKEEPER
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040646#comment-13040646
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Looking at this in my own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039918#comment-13039918
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
+1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
Trying again.
> GSoC 2010: Failure Detector Mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039759#comment-13039759
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
Hi Camille,
This patch is updated to trunk.
Do you know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038324#comment-13038324
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Hi Abmar,
Sorry for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027992#comment-13027992
]
Abmar Barros commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Hi Camille
Jira issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027117#comment-13027117
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
What changes will need t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13025134#comment-13025134
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
This patch addresses the last suggestions given by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13016746#comment-13016746
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
* Addressed Camille's suggestions on the review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004295#comment-13004295
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Created ReviewBoard for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002750#comment-13002750
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000717#comment-13000717
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
* Fixes findbug warning
> GSoC 2010: Failure Detec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999251#comment-12999251
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
* Updated patch with trunk
* Added the stddev as a metric
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999148#comment-12999148
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996733#comment-12996733
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12989012#comment-12989012
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abmar Barros updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-702.patch
Updated patch with trunk.
Gustavo, I am currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982890#action_12982890
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the results of tes
Hi Abmar,
> My implementation for the Phi-Accrual is based on the Cassandra's
> failure detector, which in turn is based on the ED FD, that is an
> extension of the original Phi-Accrual paper. The ED FD states that
> an exponential distribution
In the comments you said that it'd be possible to se
Hi Gustavo,
My implementation for the Phi-Accrual is based on the Cassandra's failure
detector, which in turn is based on the ED FD, that is an extension of the
original Phi-Accrual paper. The ED FD states that an exponential
distribution fits the ping inter-arrival sampling window better than a
n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935310#action_12935310
]
Gustavo Niemeyer commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
This is very interesting
True, the jira refers to Cassandra. I think Abmar has just experimented with it, but it is certainly best if he clarifies it.On the C client, that's a very good point. In one of my reviews I pointed it out, but I couldn't find another comment talking about it. I'm not aware of anyone working on it.
> Hi Gustavo, I don't know if Abmar was using Cassandra as reference
> (it doesn't sound like from the jira comments), but I followed the paper.
> Feel free to double-check it if you have a chance.
The description references Cassandra explicitly, which is why I
wondered. But then, his comments do
the use of phi accrual.-FlavioOn Nov 24, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:Hi Flavio,Hi, ZOOKEEPER-702 changes the way we do failure detection in ZooKeeper, andit is an important change. I'd like to see it committed soon (it has beensitting there for a while), but at the same time I
> As a minor comment, even though Cassandra claims to implement the Phi
> accrual failure detector, last time I looked they didn't really
> implement the algorithm which is in the paper. If someone is going to
> implement something similar, I suggest looking at the paper rather
> than Cassandra's
Hi Flavio,
> Hi, ZOOKEEPER-702 changes the way we do failure detection in ZooKeeper, and
> it is an important change. I'd like to see it committed soon (it has been
> sitting there for a while), but at the same time I'd like to make sure that
> no one has an issue with it.
Hi, ZOOKEEPER-702 changes the way we do failure detection in
ZooKeeper, and it is an important change. I'd like to see it committed
soon (it has been sitting there for a while), but at the same time I'd
like to make sure that no one has an issue with it. If this is
interesting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935084#action_12935084
]
Abmar Barros commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
Hi Flavio, thanks for the feedbac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flavio Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-702:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
It sounds like there is still one findbugs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12934994#action_12934994
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-702:
-
-1 overall. Here are the results of tes
46 matches
Mail list logo