Il giorno mar 12 feb 2019 alle ore 10:56 Norbert Kalmar
ha scritto:
>
> There was some discussion about checkstyle a while back, but I can't find
> it. Maybe it was on a PR.
> We concluded that we have so many violations it doesn't make sense to
> activate. But as you suggested, I think the same w
There was some discussion about checkstyle a while back, but I can't find
it. Maybe it was on a PR.
We concluded that we have so many violations it doesn't make sense to
activate. But as you suggested, I think the same was concluded, that it
should be activated on master sooner or later, should onl
Hi,
I did not notice that we already have checkstyle configuration in the ANT build.
This is the command
ant checkstyle
Unfortunately we have hundreds of violations
I think it will be a great step to re-enable checkstyle on master
after we get a "stable" release of the 3.5 branch.
I expect
