Michael,
I wouldn't characterize the current proposal as broken so much as it talks
about connection balancing rather than server balancing. Other than that, I
think I agree with what you are saying.
So we have two folks with a feeling that server balancing from the client
side is significantly
>> Will there be a code effect?
There will be - the current rebalancing algorithm will be broken if no code
is done to StaticHostProvider.updateServerList to teach it aware of
multiple server addresses belong to the same server. For example, currently
if we add a new server through reconfig, the
There have been several comments on the document. I will be porting discussions
from the document back to the mailing list each day.
Alex Shraer makes a good point that with the design as stated, there is no
provision for dealing with the rebalancing of client connections during dynamic
I am starting work on a project to improve the tolerance of Zookeeper to
network failures and would like feedback on the idea.
The problem is that with environments where link bonding is forbidden (they
exist, trust me), Zookeeper is sensitive to the loss of a single switch or
a few network
