On 30 July 2015 at 16:52, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
FYI, we discussed cross-origin service workers last week at the
face-to-face meeting:
https://blog.wanderview.com/blog/2015/07/28/service-worker-meeting-highlights/#foreign-fetch
From the post:
The idea is to permit a service
FYI, we discussed cross-origin service workers last week at the
face-to-face meeting:
https://blog.wanderview.com/blog/2015/07/28/service-worker-meeting-highlights/#foreign-fetch
It seems we're all in agreement that we should provide something here. We
just need to de-conflict our two proposed
Hi Dave
This might not related to the original subject
but just provide some comments on your previous post.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Dave Huseby dhus...@mozilla.com wrote:
Some of the prototype use cases we've thought of are:
1. Storing an encryption key on the Secure Element and
On 07/03/2015 10:26, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Unless we can think on some way to make my mother understands what she
would be granting access to, then no :P.
This is tangentially offtopic to this thread, but I would appreciate if
everybody please avoided using mothers as examples of
Soledad makes a good point. And besides, do you really want to insult your
mother to the public? :)
[ light hearted joke ]
Regards,
Naoki
On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:32 AM, Soledad Penadés spena...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 10:26, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Unless we can think
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 1:14:26 AM UTC+1, Dave Huseby wrote:
Paul and I were discussing this in the context of the proposed
crypto-ish hardware framework. I'm replying here to get some more
eyes on what we discussed.
Using apps to provide services via IAC of some form is a good
See also
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.gaia/0CkXpQ25Wdc
I think we're trying to solve similar problems in a slightly different way.
It's possible navigator.connect with cross-origin onfetch events for
Service Workers could achieve some of this, and already has another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/07/2015 01:20 AM, Paul Theriault wrote:
In general I think the next step here is to flesh out what some of
these services might do? I'm struggling to think of actual
services that would support gaia use cases in a safe way but its
On 07 Mar 2015, at 23:31, Paul Theriault
ptheria...@mozilla.commailto:ptheria...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.commailto:antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com
wrote:
On 07/03/2015 10:20, Paul Theriault
On 07/03/2015 10:20, Paul Theriault wrote:
I can't comment on webby-ness, but I do have thoughts about security here.
(OK, just one comment: this sounds like a variation on the existing inter app
communications service - its there practically any differences, other than a
forward declaration
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
On 07/03/2015 10:20, Paul Theriault wrote:
I can't comment on webby-ness, but I do have thoughts about security
here.
(OK, just one comment: this sounds like a variation on the
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:50 PM, ANTONIO MANUEL AMAYA CALVO
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
On 26 Feb 2015, at 14:31, Vivien Nicolas vnico...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
On 27 Feb 2015, at 16:22, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
Well, we only need to add a magic explained (I did explain it after all, I
think :P) iframe variant to the web
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
Well, we only need to add a magic explained (I did explain it after all, I
think :P) iframe variant to the web because FirefoxOS already has some
other magic more or less explained
On 02/26/2015 05:02 AM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Hi there.
In the frame of the recent arguments about the permission model and
making the apps more webby and as a result more easily updatable (or the
other way around), we've been playing with the idea (and trying to
prototype) of
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
BTW, exposing new APIs is not hard... agreeing to make them available to
everyone on the web is a lng process though ;). This way we don't
really add anything new to the web, we just
On 27/02/2015 9:14, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.commailto:antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com
wrote:
BTW, exposing new APIs is not hard... agreeing to make them available to
everyone on the web is
The iframe approach is quite semantic and it makes explicit the dependency
between your app and the service. Moreover, the URL is actually the name for anything
in the WWW, I think it's better than a simple name (more verbose, that's right), and
as Antonio already stated .postMessage() is the
Hi all
On 26/02/15 12:02, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo wrote:
Hi there.
In the frame of the recent arguments about the permission model and making the
apps more webby and as a result more easily updatable (or the other way
around), we've been playing with the idea (and trying to prototype) of
Thanks for starting this thread Antonio.
On the scenario that you propose, at least for the use case that you
provided (settings), it seems that we are moving the permission check from
Gecko to Gaia. On Gecko we currently have signed apps and a list of
permissions associated to them. On the
On 26/02/2015 16:11, Fernando Jiménez Moreno wrote:
Thanks for starting this thread Antonio.
On the scenario that you propose, at least for the use case that you provided
(settings), it seems that we are moving the permission check from Gecko to Gaia.
Yes and not. I'm not proposing to move the
On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Vivien Nicolas vnico...@mozilla.com wrote:
One way to implement the services would be (and that's what we're actually
toying with) to use IAC or Datastores to communicate with them). But as we
were reminded recently, there's little to no chance of those APIs
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com wrote:
Hi there.
In the frame of the recent arguments about the permission model and making
the apps more webby and as a result more easily updatable (or the other way
around), we've been
On 26 Feb 2015, at 14:31, Vivien Nicolas
vnico...@mozilla.commailto:vnico...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Antonio Manuel Amaya Calvo
antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.commailto:antoniomanuel.amayaca...@telefonica.com
wrote:
Hi there.
In the frame of the recent
On 26/02/2015 16:23, Fabrice Desré wrote:
On 02/26/2015 07:11 AM, Fernando Jiménez Moreno wrote:
Thanks for starting this thread Antonio.
On the scenario that you propose, at least for the use case that you
provided (settings), it seems that we are moving the permission check
from Gecko to
Hi there.
In the frame of the recent arguments about the permission model and making the
apps more webby and as a result more easily updatable (or the other way
around), we've been playing with the idea (and trying to prototype) of having
certified service-like apps that would encapsulate
26 matches
Mail list logo
